Step 1 of 3. This form allows you to add a new citation to our database.
Our data says that the document:
Michael R, King ; Nikola, Tarashev ; Steven, Ongena ; Michael, King ; Steven, Ongena ; Nikola, Tarashev. (2016) Bank standalone credit ratings.
In: BIS Working Papers. RePEc:bis:biswps:542.
Full description at Econpapers
cites:
Table III: Descriptive Statistics 9-Point Standalone Rating A A/B B B/C C C/D D D/E E Equivalent Numeric Point 19 17 15.5 13.5 11.5 9.5 7 5 1.5 Number of Banks aaa 20 aa+ 19 aa 18 5 1 6 aa- 17 2 21 1 24 a+ 16 7 3 10 a 15 7 18 25 a- 14 3 29 1 33 bbb+ 13 4 18 22 bbb 12 8 23 31 bbb- 11 13 16 29 bb+ 10 7 7 bb 9 10 2 12 bb- 8 2 2 b+ 7 7 1 8 b 6 1 1 b- 5 ccc+ 4 ccc 3 2 2 ccc- 2 cc 1 c 0 Number of Banks 7 39 63 55 33 12 1 2 212 Total Number of Banks Legend The mapping from the 9- to 21-Point Standalone Rating that was communicated by Fitch XY The number of individual banks that transitioned This table shows the 9-Point Standalone Rating ("Individual Rating") on the horizontal axis and and 21-Point Standalone Rating ("Viability Rating") on the vertical axis. The gray boxes show the mapping from the 9- to 21-Point Standalone Rating that was communicated by Fitch prior to the transition, and for each of the 212 individual banks on the announcement on July 20, 2011.
but, as far as we know, such cited document is not available on RePEc.
If you know this information is not correct, you may help us to improve our service giving us the handle of the cited document in the box below. In this way, we could add the citation to CitEc.
Note that if you are the author of a cited document which it is not available on RePEc, you can submit a copy to the Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA). Upload a paper now.