This document has not been cited yet.

References contributed by 1257797_38591790125480

1. Bacha, Sami, Azouzi, Mohamed Ali, 2019. How gender and emotions bias the credit decision-making in banking firms. J. Behav. Exp. Financ. 22, 183–191.

2. Ballard, Charles, Johnson, Marianne, 2005. Gender, expectations, and grades in introductory microeconomics at a US university. Fem. Econ. 11, 95–122.

3. Bao, Te, Hommes, Cars, Pei, Jiaoying, 2021. Expectation formation in finance and macroeconomics: a review of new experimental evidence. J. Behav. Exp. Financ. 32, 100591.

4. Bao, Wei, Wang, Yunhong, Yu, Tingting, Zhou, Jiarong, Luo, Junlong, 2022. Women rely on gut feeling? The neural pattern of gender difference in non-mathematic intuition. Personal. Individ. Differ. 196, 111720.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
5. Baron, J., Scott, S., Fincher, K., Metz, S.E., 2015. Why does the Cognitive Reflection Test (sometimes) predict utilitarian moral judgment (and other things)? J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 4 (3), 265–284.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
6. Belliveau, Jacob, Yakovenko, Igor, 2022. Evaluating and improving the quality of survey data from panel and crowd-sourced samples: A practical guide for psychological research. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 30, 400–408.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
7. Bernard, Michael E., Gregory, J.Boyle, Beverley, F.Jackling, 1990. Sex-role identity and mental ability. Personal. Individ. Differ. 11, 213–217.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Białek, Michał., Muda, Rafał., Stewart, Kaiden, Niszczota, Paweł., Pienkosz, ´ Damian, 2020. Thinking in a Foreign language distorts allocation of cognitive effort: evidence from reasoning. Cognition 205, 104420.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Blacksmith, Nikki, Yongwei Yang, Gregory Ruark, and Tara Behrend. 2018. "A Validity Analysis of the Cognitive Reflection Test Using an Item-Response-Tree Model." In Academy of Management Proceedings, 1: 18090. Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management, 2018.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
10. Boissin, Esther, Caparos, Serge, Raoelison, Matthieu, De Neys, Wim, 2021. From bias to sound intuiting: boosting correct intuitive reasoning. Cognition 211, 104645.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

11. Bottasso, Anna, Duchˆene, S´ebastien, Guerci, Eric, Hanaki, Nobuyuki, Noussair, Charles N., 2022. Higher order risk attitudes of financial experts. J. Behav. Exp. Financ. 34, 100658.

12. Branas-Garza, ˜ Pablo, Kujal, Praveen, Lenkei, Balint, 2019. Cognitive reflection test: whom, how, when. J. Behav. Exp. Econ. 82, 101455.

13. Breaban, Adriana, Noussair, Charles N., 2015. Trader characteristics and fundamental value trajectories in an asset market experiment. J. Behav. Exp. Financ. 8, 1–17.

14. Byrd, Nick, Conway, Paul, 2019. Not all who ponder count costs: arithmetic reflection predicts utilitarian tendencies, but logical reflection predicts both deontological and utilitarian tendencies. Cognition 192, 103995.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

15. Campara, Jessica, Da Costa Jr, Newton, Matsushita, Raul, Da Silva, Sergio, 2021. Two selves and two minds in a longitudinal survey of risk attitudes. J. Behav. Exp. Financ. 29, 100444.

16. Campitelli, Guillermo, Gerrans, Paul, 2014. Does the cognitive reflection test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modeling approach. Mem. Cogn. 42, 434–447.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. Cardoso, Ricardo Lopes, de Oliveira Leite, Rodrigo, Carlos Busanelli de Aquino, Andr´e, 2018. The effect of cognitive reflection on the efficacy of impression management: an experimental analysis with financial analysts. Account. Audit. Account. J. 31, 1668–1690.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

18. Cokely, Edward T., Kelley, Colleen M., 2009. Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: a protocol analysis and process model evaluation. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 4, 20–33.

19. Costa, Albert, Foucart, Alice, Arnon, Inbal, Aparici, Melina, Apesteguia, Jose, 2014. Piensa twice: on the foreign language effect in decision making. Cognition 130, 236–254.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
20. Craighead, Christopher W., Ketchen, David J., Dunn, Kaitlin S., Tomas, G., Hult, M., 2011. Addressing common method variance: guidelines for survey research on information technology, operations, and supply chain management. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 58, 578–588.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

21. Cribari-Neto, Francisco, Zarkos, Spyros G., 1999. Bootstrap methods for heteroskedastic regression models: evidence on estimation and testing. Econom. Rev. 18, 211–228.

22. Cueva, Carlos, Iturbe-Ormaetxe, Inigo, Mata-P´erez, Esther, Ponti, Giovanni, Sartarelli, Marcello, Yu, Haihan, Zhukova, Vita, 2016. Cognitive (ir) reflection: new experimental evidence. J. Behav. Exp. Econ. 64, 81–93.

23. de La Bruslerie, Hubert, 2015. Decreasing term structure of psychological discount rates: Experimental estimation and determinants. J. Behav. Exp. Financ. 6, 13–26.

24. Dennin, Allyson, Furman, Kayla, Pretz, Jean E., Roy, Michael M., 2022. The relationship of types of intuition to thinking styles, beliefs, and cognitions. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 35, e2283.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
25. Douglas, Benjamin D., Ewell, Patrick J., Brauer, Markus, 2023. Data quality in online human-subjects research: Comparisons between MTurk, Prolific, CloudResearch, Qualtrics, and SONA. PLoS ONE 18 (3), e0279720.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
26. Epstein, Seymour, Pacini, Rosemary, Denes-Raj, Veronika, Heier, Harriet, 1996. Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 71, 390–405.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
27. Francis, Leslie J., James, D.J., 1996. The relationship between rosenberg’s construct of self-esteem and eysenck’s two-dimensional model of personality. Personal. Individ. Differ. 21, 483–488.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

28. Frederick, Shane, 2005. Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econ. Perspect. 19, 25–42.

29. Grieve, Rachel, March, Evita, Van Doorn, George, 2019. Masculinity might be more toxic than we think: the influence of gender roles on trait emotional manipulation. Personal. Individ. Differ. 138, 157–162.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

30. Hermansson, Cecilia, Jonsson, Sara, 2021. The impact of financial literacy and financial interest on risk tolerance. J. Behav. Exp. Financ. 29, 100450.

31. Hofstede Insights. 2022. ’Country Comparison Tool’. 〈https://www.hofstede-insights. com/country-comparison/belgium,the-usa/〉.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
32. Howard, Matt C., Fox, Faith R., 2020. Does gender have a significant relationship with social courage? Test of dual sequentially mediated pathways. Personal. Individ. Differ. 159, 109904.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

33. Isler, Ozan, Rojas, Andres, Dulleck, Uwe, 2022. Easy to shove, difficult to show: Effect of educative and default nudges on financial self-management. J. Behav. Exp. Financ. 34, 100639.

34. Kienzler, Mario, Daniel V¨ astfjall, ¨ Gustav Tinghog, ¨ 2022. Individual differences in susceptibility to financial bullshit. J. Behav. Exp. Financ. 34, 100655.

35. Kiss, Hubert J., Rodriguez-Lara, Ismael, Rosa-Garcia, Alfonso, 2022. Preventing (panic) bank runs. J. Behav. Exp. Financ. 35, 100697.

36. Kiss, Hubert Janos, Ismael Rodriguez-Lara, Alfonso Rosa-García, 2016. Think twice before running! Bank runs and cognitive abilities. J. Behav. Exp. Econ. 64, 12–19.

37. Levy, Neil., 2023. What does the CRT measure? Poor performance may arise from rational processes. Philos. Psychol. 36 (1), 58–84.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

38. Lusardi, A., Mitchell, O.S., 2007. Baby boomer retirement security: the roles of planning, financial literacy, and housing wealth. J. Monet. Econ. 54, 205–224.

39. Meub, Lukas, Proeger, Till, 2016. Can anchoring explain biased forecasts? experimental evidence. J. Behav. Exp. Financ. 12, 1–13.

40. Nelson, Julie A., 2016. Not-so-strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Fem. Econ. 22, 114–142.

41. Oechssler, J.org, ¨ Andreas Roider, Schmitz, Patrick W., 2009. Cognitive abilities and behavioral biases. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 72, 147–152.

42. Otero, Inmaculada, Salgado, Jesús F., Moscoso, Silvia, 2022. Cognitive reflection, cognitive intelligence, and cognitive abilities: A meta-analysis. Intelligence 90, 101614.

43. Patton, John R., 2003. Intuition in decisions. Manag. Decis. 41, 989–996.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
44. Pennycook, Gordon, Allan Cheyne, James, Koehler, Derek J., Fugelsang, Jonathan A., 2016. Is the Cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition? Behav. Res. Methods 48, 341–348.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
45. Podsakoff, Philip M., MacKenzie, Scott B., Lee, Jeong-Yeon, Podsakoff, Nathan P., 2003. Common method bias in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88, 879–903.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
46. Potrich, Grigion, Ani Caroline, Vieira, Kelmara Mendes, Coronel, Daniel Arruda, Filho, Reisoli Bender, 2015. Financial literacy in Southern Brazil: modeling and invariance between genders. J. Behav. Exp. Financ. 6, 1–12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

47. Potrich, Grigion, Ani Caroline, Vieira, Kelmara Mendes, Kirch, Guilherme, 2018. How well do women do when it comes to financial literacy? Proposition of an indicator and analysis of gender differences. J. Behav. Exp. Financ. 17, 28–41.

48. Powell, Owen, Shestakova, Natalia, 2016. Experimental asset markets: a survey of recent developments. J. Behav. Exp. Financ. 12, 14–22.

49. Primi, Caterina, Donati, Maria Anna, Chiesi, Francesca, Morsanyi, Kinga, 2018. Are there gender differences in cognitive reflection? invariance and differences related to mathematics. Think. Reason. 24, 258–279.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
50. Primi, Caterina, Morsanyi, Kinga, Chiesi, Francesca, Anna Donati, Maria, Jayne, Hamilton, 2016. The development and testing of a new version of the cognitive reflection test applying item response theory (IRT). J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 29 (5), 453–469.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

51. Rankin, Katherine N., 2002. Social capital, microfinance, and the politics of development. Fem. Econ. 8, 1–24.

52. Raoelison, Matthieu, Thompson, Valerie A., De Neys, Wim, 2020. The smart intuitor: cognitive capacity predicts intuitive rather than deliberate thinking. Cognition 204, 104381.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

53. Rassenti, S., 2021. Differences in cognitive reflection mediate gender differences in social preferences. ESI Work. Pap. 21–22. https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/esi_ working_papers/359/.

54. Razen, Michael, Kirchler, Michael, Weitzel, Utz, 2020. Domain-specific risk-taking among finance professionals. J. Behav. Exp. Financ. 27, 100331.

55. Rosenberg, Morris, 1965. Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

56. Scott M., Smith, Roster, Catherine A., Golden, Linda L., Albaum, Gerald S., 2016. A multigroup analysis of online survey respondent data quality: Comparing a regular USA consumer panel to MTurk samples. J. Bus. Res. 69 (8), 3139–3148.

57. Sent, Esther-Mirjam, Staveren, Irene van, 2019. A feminist review of behavioral economic research on gender differences. Fem. Econ. 25, 1–35.

58. Simmering, Marcia, J., Fuller, Christie M., Richardson, Hettie A., Yasemin Ocal, Atinc, Guclu M., 2015. Marker variable choice, reporting, and interpretation in the detection of common method variance: a review and demonstration. Organ. Res. Methods 18, 473–511.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
59. Spiller, Stephen A., Fitzsimons, Gavan J., Lynch Jr, John G., McClelland, Gary H., 2013. Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: Simple effects tests in moderated regression. J. Mark. Res. 50 (2), 277–288.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
60. Stankov, Lazar, Roberts, Richard D., 1997. Mental speed is not the ‘basic’ process of intelligence. Personal. Individ. Differ. 22, 69–84.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
61. Stupple, Edward J.N., Pitchford, Melanie, Ball, Linden J., Hunt, Thomas E., Steel, Richard, 2017. Slower is not always better: Response-time evidence clarifies the limited role of miserly information processing in the Cognitive Reflection Test. PloS one 12 (11), e0186404.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
62. Svedholm-Hakkinen, ¨ Annika M., Sini, J.Ojala, Lindeman, Marjaana, 2018. Male brain type women and female brain type men: gender atypical cognitive profiles and their correlates. Personal. Individ. Differ. 122, 7–12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
63. Thompson, Valerie A., Markovits, Henry, 2021. Reasoning strategy vs cognitive capacity as predictors of individual differences in reasoning performance. Cognition 217, 104866.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

64. Thomson, Keela S., Oppenheimer, Daniel M., 2016. Investigating an Alternate Form of the Cognitive Reflection Test. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 11 (1), 99–113.

65. Toplak, Maggie, E., West, Richard F., Stanovich, Keith E., 2014. Assessing Miserly Information Processing: An Expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test. Think. Reason. 20, 147–168.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
66. Travers, Eoin, Rolison, Jonathan J., Feeney, Aidan, 2016. The time course of conflict on the cognitive reflection test. Cognition 150, 109–118.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
67. Weiss, Alexa, Dorrough, Angela R., Schmitz, Luisa, 2021. Analytic atheism in a lowreligiosity culture: examining the relationship between analytic thinking and religious belief in Germany. Personal. Individ. Differ. 178, 110854.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
68. Zhang, Don C., Highhouse, Scott, Rada, Thaddeus B., 2016. Explaining sex differences on the cognitive reflection test. Personal. Individ. Differ. 101, 425–427
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. The Relationship Between CEO Characteristics and Banks’ Risk-Taking: Review and Research Directions. (2025). Hertrampf, Patrick ; Brunner-Kirchmair, Thomas M ; Wiedemann, Arnd.
   In: Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research.
   RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:77:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s41471-024-00199-x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Gender vs. personality: The role of masculinity in explaining cognitive style. (2024). Dhondt, Catherine ; Roger, Patrick ; Plotkina, Daria.
   In: Post-Print.
   RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04758211.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Gender vs. personality: The role of masculinity in explaining cognitive style. (2024). , Arvid ; Plotkina, Daria ; Dhondt, Catherine ; Roger, Patrick.
   In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance.
   RePEc:eee:beexfi:v:44:y:2024:i:c:s2214635024001102.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Gender vs. personality: The role of masculinity in explaining cognitive style. (2024). Dhondt, Catherine ; Roger, Patrick ; Plotkina, Daria.
   In: LIDAM Reprints LFIN.
   RePEc:ajf:louvlr:2024010.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Prospect theory and bank credit risk decision-making behaviour: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. (2023). Mafimisebi, Oluwasoye P ; Ogunmokun, Olapeju Comfort ; Obembe, Demola.
   In: SN Business & Economics.
   RePEc:spr:snbeco:v:3:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s43546-023-00464-x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. (Loan) price and (loan officer) prejudice. (2023). Burietz, Aurore ; Bertrand, Jeremie.
   In: Post-Print.
   RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04130884.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. How Gender and Primary Language Influence the Acquisition of Economic Knowledge of Secondary School Students in the United States and Germany. (2023). Walstad, William ; Schmidt, Susanne ; Happ, Roland ; Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga.
   In: JRFM.
   RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:160-:d:1084658.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Modelling credit and investment decisions based on AI algorithmic behavioral pathways. (2023). Hudson, Robert ; Rodgers, Waymond ; Economou, Fotini.
   In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
   RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:191:y:2023:i:c:s0040162523001567.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. (Loan) price and (loan officer) prejudice. (2023). Burietz, Aurore ; Bertrand, Jeremie.
   In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
   RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:210:y:2023:i:c:p:26-42.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Gender diversity and financial flexibility: Evidence from China. (2023). Xia, Yifei ; Li, Kailun ; Zhang, Jianing ; Hu, Jiamin.
    In: International Review of Financial Analysis.
    RePEc:eee:finana:v:90:y:2023:i:c:s1057521923004507.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Familiarity bias and economic decisions: Evidence from a survey experiment. (2023). Qi, Zhenyan ; Zhu, Zhaobo ; Jin, YI.
    In: Economics Letters.
    RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:229:y:2023:i:c:s0165176523002227.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Gender Diversity Effect on Tax Avoidance and Firm Risk. (2022). Mulyani, Susi Dwi ; Murwaningsari, Etty ; Sofianty, Diamonalisa.
    In: Technium Social Sciences Journal.
    RePEc:tec:journl:v:27:y:2022:i:1:p:463-480.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Breaking “Bad”: Negativity’s benefit for entrepreneurial funding. (2022). Uparna, Jayaram ; Bingham, Chris.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:139:y:2022:i:c:p:1353-1365.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Learning in the time of Covid-19: Some preliminary findings. (2021). Meder, Martin E ; Johnson, Marianne ; Engelhardt, Bryan.
    In: International Review of Economics Education.
    RePEc:eee:ireced:v:37:y:2021:i:c:s1477388021000074.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Not for want of trying: Effort and Success of women in principles of microeconomics. (2020). Hadsell, Lester.
    In: International Review of Economics Education.
    RePEc:eee:ireced:v:35:y:2020:i:c:s1477388020300165.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Board influence on a firm’s long-term success: Australian evidence. (2020). He, Rong ; Evans, Elaine.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance.
    RePEc:eee:beexfi:v:27:y:2020:i:c:s2214635019302928.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Grade Expectations: Rationality and Overconfidence. (2017). Peresetsky, Anatoly ; Magnus, Jan.
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20170054.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Financial Self-Efficacy on Women Entrepreneurs Success. (2017). Asandimitra, Nadia ; Kautsar, Achmad.
    In: International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences.
    RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:7:y:2017:i:11:p:293-300.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Learning styles and performance in principles of economics: does the gender gap exist?. (2017). Terrazzano, Gianfranco ; Sabiston, David ; Leung, Ambrose.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-17-00163.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. IS GENDER BIAS A COST OF FAILURE ISSUE?. (2014). Rosa-García, Alfonso ; MARTiNEZ, Carmen MARiN .
    In: Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies.
    RePEc:eaa:eerese:v:14:y2014:i:3_2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Gamblers fallacy in the classroom?. (2013). Kiss, Hubert Janos ; Selei, Adrienn.
    In: CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS.
    RePEc:has:discpr:1342.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Methods for evaluating educational programs: Does Writing Center Participation affect student achievement?. (2013). Otten, Sebastian ; Crede, Carsten ; Bredtmann, Julia.
    In: Evaluation and Program Planning.
    RePEc:eee:epplan:v:36:y:2013:i:1:p:115-123.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Gender bias in risk aversion: evidence from multiple choice exams. (2011). Rosa-García, Alfonso ; Marin, Carmen ; Rosa-Garcia, Alfonso.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:39987.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Student Characteristics, Behavior, and Performance in Economics Classes. (2011). Owen, Ann L..
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:13836_32.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. ISEG Undergraduate Students: Determinants of Academic Performance. (2008). Lopes, Margarida ; Fernandes, Graa Leo.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:22082.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Grades, gender, and encouragement: A regression discontinuity analysis. (2008). Owen, Ann.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:11586.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-23 13:09:08 || Missing content? Let us know