create a website

.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 65

References cited by this document

Cocites: 58

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abbas, A. E., I.-H. Hann. 2010. Measuring risk aversion in a nameyour -own-price channel. Decision Anal. 7(1) 123–136.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Armantier, O., N. Treich. 2009a. Star-shaped probability weighting functions and overbidding in first-price auctions. Econom. Lett. 104(2) 83–85.

  3. Armantier, O., N. Treich. 2009b. Subjective probabilities in games: An application to the overbidding puzzle. Internat. Econom.

  4. Bajari, P., A. Hortacsu. 2005. Are structural estimates of auction models reasonable? Evidence from experimental data. J. Political Econom. 113(4) 703–741.

  5. Barrett, G. F., S. G. Donald. 2003. Consistent tests for stochastic dominance. Econometrica 71(1) 71–104.

  6. Berg, J., J. Dickhaut, K. McCabe. 2005. Risk preference instability across institutions: A dilemma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102(11) 4209–4214.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Bradlow, E. T., Y.-H. Park. 2007. Bayesian estimation of bid sequences in Internet auctions using a generalized recordbreaking model. Marketing Sci. 26(2) 218–229.

  8. Brown, J., T. Hossain, J. Morgan. 2010. Shrouded attributes and information suppression: Evidence from the field. Quart. J. Econom. 125(2) 859–876.

  9. Camerer, C. F., T.-H. Ho. 1999. Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica 67(4) 827–874.

  10. Cantillon, E. 2008. The effect of bidders’ asymmetries on expected revenue in auctions. Games Econom. Behav. 61(1) 1–25.

  11. Chafkin, M. 2007. Reverse auctions: A supplier’s survival guide. Inc. (April 25) http://inc.com/inctr/2007/04/reverse -auctions-a-suppliers-survival-guide.html.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Chan, T. Y., V. Kadiyali, Y.-H. Park. 2007. Willingness to pay and competition in online auctions. J. Marketing Res. 44(2) 324–333.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Chen-Ritzo, C.-H., T. P. Harrison, A. M. Kwasnica, D. J. Thomas. 2005. Better, faster, cheaper: An experimental analysis of a multiattribute reverse auction mechanism with restricted information feedback. Management Sci. 51(12) 1753–1762.

  14. Chen, K.-Y., C. R. Plott. 1998. Nonlinear behavior in sealed bid first price auctions. Games Econom. Behav. 25(1) 34–78.

  15. Coppinger, V. M., V. L. Smith, J. A. Titus. 1980. Incentives and behavior in English, Dutch, and sealed-bid auctions. Econom. Inquiry 18(1) 1–22.

  16. Cox, J. C., B. Roberson, V. L. Smith. 1982. Theory and behavior of single object auctions. V. L. Smith, ed. Research in Experimental Economics, Vol. 2. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 537–579.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Cox, J., R. L. Oaxaca. 1996. Is bidding behavior consistent with bidding theory for private value auctions? R. M. Issac, ed. Research in Experimental Economics, Vol. 6. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 131–148.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Crawford, V. P., N. Iriberri. 2007. Level-k auctions: Can a nonequilibrium model of strategic thinking explain the winner’s curse and overbidding in private-value auctions? Econometrica 75(6) 1721–1770.

  19. Dholakia, U. M., I. Simonson. 2005. The effect of explicit reference points on consumer choice and online bidding behavior. Marketing Sci. 24(2) 206–217.

  20. Dittrich, D. A. V., W. Guth, M. Kocher, P. Pezanis-Christou. 2011. Loss aversion and learning to bid. Economica, ePub ahead of print August 18.

  21. Elmaghraby, W. 2007. Auctions within e-sourcing events. Production Oper. Management 16(4) 409–422.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R., E. Katok. 2007. Regret in auctions: Theory and evidence. Econom. Theory 33(1) 81–101.

  23. Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R., E. Katok. 2008. Regret and feedback information in first-price sealed-bid auctions. Management Sci. 54(4) 808–819.

  24. Fay, S. 2004. Partial-repeat-bidding in the name-your-own-price channel. Marketing Sci. 23(3) 407–418.

  25. Filiz-Ozbay, E., E. Y. Ozbay. 2007. Auctions with anticipated regret: Theory and experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(4) 1407–1418.

  26. Goeree, J., C. A. Holt, T. R. Palfrey. 2002. Quantal response equilibrium and overbidding in private-value auctions. J. Econom. Theory 104(1) 247–272.

  27. Guerre, E., I. Perrigne, Q. Vuong. 2009. Nonparametric identification of risk aversion in first-price auctions under exclusion restrictions. Econometrica 77(4) 1193–1227.

  28. Guth, W., R. Ivanova-Stenzel, M. Konigstein, M. Strobel. 2003. Learning to bid—An experimental study of bid function adjustments in auctions and fair division games. Econom. J. 113(487) 477–494.

  29. Haruvy, E., E. Katok. 2008. An experimental investigation of buyer determined procurement auctions. Working paper, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Hendricks, K., R. H. Porter. 1988. An empirical study of an auction with asymmetric information. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(5) 865–883.

  31. Holt, C. A., Jr. 1980. Competitive bidding for contracts under alternative auction procedures. J. Political Econom. 88(3) 433–445.

  32. Hossain, T., J. Morgan. 2006. Plus shipping and handling: Revenue (non) equivalence in field experiments on eBay. B. E. J. Econom. Anal. Policy 6(2). http://works.bepress.com/ john_morgan/1.

  33. Hui, S. K., P. S. Fader, E. T. Bradlow. 2009. Path data in marketing: An integrative framework and prospectus for model building. Marketing Sci. 28(2) 320–335.

  34. James, D., D. Reagle. 2009. Experience weighted attraction in the first price auction and Becker Degroot Marschak. R. S.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Jap, S. D. 2002. Online reverse auctions: Issues, themes, and prospects for the future. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 30(4) 506–525.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Jap, S. D. 2007. The impact of online reverse auction design on buyer-supplier relationships. J. Marketing 71(1) 146–159.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Jap, S. D., E. Haruvy. 2008. Interorganizational relationships and bidding behavior in industrial online reverse auctions. J. Marketing Res. 45(5) 550–561.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Jap, S. D., P. A. Naik. 2008. BidAnalyzer: A method for estimation and selection of dynamic bidding models. Marketing Sci. 27(6) 949–960.

  39. Kagel, J. H, D. Levin. 1993. Independent private value auctions: Bidder behavior in first-, second-, and third-price auctions with varying numbers of bidders. Econom. J. 103(419) 868–879.

  40. Kagel, J. H. 1995. Auctions: A survey of experimental research. J. H. Kagel, A. E. Roth, eds. The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 501–586.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Kagel, J. H., D. Levin. 2008. Auctions: Experiments. S. N. Durlauf, L. E. Blume, eds. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd ed. Palgrave McMillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Kagel, J. H., D. Levin. 2012. Auctions: A survey of experimental research 1995–2008. J. H. Kagel, A. E. Roth, eds. The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Vol. 2. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Forthcoming.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Kirchkamp, O., J. P. Reiss. 2008. Heterogeneous bids in auctions with rational and markdown bidders—Theory and experiment.

  44. Krasnokutskaya, E. 2011. Identification and estimation of auction models with unobserved heterogeneity. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78(1) 293–327. Copyright: INFORMS holds copyright to this Articles in Advance version, which is made available to subscribers. The file may not be posted on any other website, including the author’s site. Please send any questions regarding this policy to permissions@informs.org.

  45. Laffont, J.-J., H. Ossard, Q. Vuong. 1995. Econometrics of first-price auctions. Econometrica 63(4) 953–980.

  46. Levy, H. 1992. Stochastic dominance and expected utility: Survey and analysis. Management Sci. 38(4) 555–593.

  47. Lucking-Reiley, D. 1999. Using field experiments to test equivalence between auction formats: Magic on the Internet. Amer. Econom.

  48. Maskin, E. S., J. G. Riley. 2000. Asymmetric auctions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 67(3) 413–438.

  49. Morgan, J., K. Steiglitz, G. Reis. 2003. The spite motive and equilibrium behavior in auctions. B. E. J. Econom. Anal. Policy 2(1) Article 5.

  50. Myerson, R. B. 1981. Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1) 58–73.

  51. Netzer, O., J. M. Lattin, V. Srinivasan. 2008. A hidden Markov model of customer relationship dynamics. Marketing Sci. 27(2) 185–204.

  52. Neugebauer, T., J. Perote. 2008. Bidding “as if” risk neutral in experimental first price auctions without information feedback. Experiment. Econom. 11(2) 190–202.

  53. Neugebauer, T., R. Selten. 2006. Individual behavior of first-price auctions: The importance of information feedback in computerized experimental markets. Games Econom. Behav. 54(1) 183–204.

  54. Ockenfels, A., R. Selten. 2005. Impulse balance equilibrium and feedback in first price auctions. Games Econom. Behav. 51(1) 155–170.

  55. Park, Y.-H., E. T. Bradlow. 2005. An integrated model for bidding behavior in Internet auctions: Whether, who, when, and how much. J. Marketing Res. 42(4) 470–482.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Parkes, D. C., J. Kalagnanam. 2005. Models for iterative multiattribute procurement auctions. Management Sci. 51(3) 435–451.

  57. Purchasing. 2001. E-auction playbook. (June 21) S1–S3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Rabiner, L. R. 1989. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc. IEEE 77(2) 257–286.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Selten, R., J. Buchta. 1998. Experimental sealed bid first price auctions with directly observed bid functions. D. V. Budescu, I. Erev, R. Zwick, eds. Games and Human Behavior: Essays in Honor of Amon Rapoport. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 79–102.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Seshadri, S., K. Chatterjee, G. L. Lilien. 1991. Multiple source procurement competitions. Marketing Sci. 10(3) 246–263.

  61. Shachat and Wei: Procuring Commodities Marketing Science, Articles in Advance, pp. 1–17, 2012 INFORMS 17 Krishna, V. 2002. Auction Theory. Academic Press, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Shachat, J., J. T. Swarthout. 2010. Procurement auctions for differentiated goods. Decision Anal. 7(1) 6–22.

  63. Vickrey, W. 1961. Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance 16(1) 8–37.

  64. Yao, S., C. F. Mela. 2008. Online auction demand. Marketing Sci. 27(5) 861–885.

  65. Zeithammer, R., C. Adams. 2010. The sealed-bid abstraction in online auctions. Marketing Sci. 29(6) 964–987. Copyright: INFORMS holds copyright to this Articles in Advance version, which is made available to subscribers. The file may not be posted on any other website, including the author’s site. Please send any questions regarding this policy to permissions@informs.org.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The Prospect Theory and First Price Auctions: an Explanation of Overbidding. (2023). Josheski, Dushko ; Apostolov, Mico ; Dushko, Josheski.
    In: Econometrics. Advances in Applied Data Analysis.
    RePEc:vrs:eaiada:v:27:y:2023:i:1:p:33-74:n:3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Target versus budget reverse auctions: an online experiment using the strategy method. (2023). Preget, Raphaele ; Tidball, Mabel ; Coiffard, Adrien.
    In: CEE-M Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpceem:hal-04055743.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Target versus budget reverse auctions: an online experiment using the strategy method. (2023). Preget, Raphaele ; Tidball, Mabel ; Coiffard, Adrien.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04055743.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Motivated beliefs in auctions. (2022). Riehm, Tobias.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:22062.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The Generalized First- and Second-Price Auctions: Overbidding, Underbidding, and Optimal Reserve Price. (2022). Tan, Ziyi ; Liu, Shulin.
    In: Mathematics.
    RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:3:p:403-:d:735941.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Disentangling risk aversion and loss aversion in first-price auctions: An empirical approach. (2022). Ratan, Anmol ; Kim, Dong-Hyuk.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:150:y:2022:i:c:s0014292122001726.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Separating probability weighting and risk aversion in first-price auctions. (2022). Walker, Matthew ; Haruvy, Ernan ; Heinrich, Timo.
    In: Economics Letters.
    RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:221:y:2022:i:c:s0165176522003652.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Spite vs. risk: Explaining overbidding in the second-price all-pay auction. (2021). Mill, Wladislaw ; Kirchkamp, Oliver.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:130:y:2021:i:c:p:616-635.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The beauty of Dutch: Bidding behavior in combinatorial first-price procurement auctions. (2021). Paulsen, Per ; Bichler, Martin ; Kokott, Gian-Marco.
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:291:y:2021:i:2:p:711-721.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Estimating risk preferences integrating insurance choices with subjective beliefs. (2021). Raffaelli, Roberta ; Menapace, Luisa ; Fezzi, Carlo.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:135:y:2021:i:c:s0014292121000702.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Essays in asset pricing and auctions. (2020). Popescu, Andreea Victoria.
    In: Other publications TiSEM.
    RePEc:tiu:tiutis:879f7643-7123-4bc8-a5e7-6770d8c93df3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Contests with money and time: Experimental evidence on overbidding in all-pay auctions. (2020). Noussair, Charles ; Popescu, Andreea Victoria ; Breaban, Adriana.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:171:y:2020:i:c:p:391-405.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Fishing for fools. (2020). Szeidl, Adam ; Malmendier, Ulrike.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:122:y:2020:i:c:p:105-129.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Trust as a decision under ambiguity. (2019). Wakker, Peter ; Turmunkh, Uyanga ; Li, Chen.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:22:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10683-018-9582-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. On (mis-)perception of probabilities in first-price sealed-bid auctions. (2019). Keskin, Kerim ; Kantur, Zeynep.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-18-00340.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Spite vs. risk: explaining overbidding. (2019). Mill, Wladislaw ; Kirchkamp, Oliver.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7631.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. RISK AVERSION AND OVERBIDDING IN FIRST PRICE SEALED BID AUCTIONS: NEW EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE. (2019). Weitzel, Utz ; Füllbrunn, Sascha ; Fullbrunn, Sascha ; Janssen, Dirkjan.
    In: Economic Inquiry.
    RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:57:y:2019:i:1:p:631-647.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Pushing subjects beyond rationality with more alternatives in experimental auctions. (2019). Palma, Marco ; Chavez, Daniel.
    In: Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:agecon:v:50:y:2019:i:2:p:207-217.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Exploration vs exploitation, impulse balance equilibrium, and a specification test for the El Farol bar problem. (2018). Pezanis-Christou, Paul ; Laisney, Francois ; Kirman, Alan.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:18038.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. The Enforcement of Mandatory Disclosure Rules. (2018). González, Paula ; Dahm, Matthias ; Gonzalez, Paula ; Porteiro, Nicolas.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:pab:wpaper:18.09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. The enforcement of mandatory disclosure rules. (2018). González, Paula ; Dahm, Matthias ; Gonzalez, Paula ; Porteiro, Nicolas.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:167:y:2018:i:c:p:21-32.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Cumulative prospect theory preferences in rent-seeking contests. (2018). Keskin, Kerim.
    In: Mathematical Social Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:96:y:2018:i:c:p:85-91.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Your money or your time? Experimental evidence on overbidding in all-pay auctions. (2018). Noussair, Charles ; Popescu, Andreea Victoria ; Breaban, Adriana.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:chu:wpaper:18-20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Factors Influencing Corn Fungicide Treatment Decisions. (2018). Rosburg, Alicia ; Menapace, Luisa.
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:273444.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. A non-game-theoretic approach to bidding in first-price and all-pay auctions. (2018). Wu, Hang ; Pezanis-Christou, Paul.
    In: School of Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:adl:wpaper:2018-12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Preferences and decision support in competitive bidding. (2017). Rasch, Alexander ; Zeppenfeld, Christopher ; Gillen, Philippe ; Fugger, Nicolas.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:17057.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Quality Information and Procurement Auction Outcomes: Evidence from a Payment for Ecosystem Services Laboratory Experiment. (2017). Griffin, Robert M ; Conte, Marc N.
    In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:wly:ajagec:v:99:y:2017:i:3:p:571-591.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. The spite motive in third price auctions. (2017). Mill, Wladislaw.
    In: Economics Letters.
    RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:161:y:2017:i:c:p:71-73.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. A Naïve Approach to Bidding. (2017). Wu, Hang ; Pezanis-Christou, Paul.
    In: School of Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:adl:wpaper:2017-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Preferences and Decision Support in Competitive Bidding. (2016). Rasch, Alexander ; Zeppenfeld, Christopher ; Fugger, Nicolas.
    In: VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc16:145849.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Experimental methods: Pay one or pay all. (2016). gneezy, uri ; Charness, Gary ; Halladay, Brianna.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:131:y:2016:i:pa:p:141-150.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Optimal bidding in auctions from a game theory perspective. (2016). Lorentziadis, Panos L.
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:248:y:2016:i:2:p:347-371.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Eliciting beliefs in continuous-choice games: a double auction experiment. (2015). Neri, Claudia.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:18:y:2015:i:4:p:569-608.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. A penny for your thoughts: a survey of methods for eliciting beliefs. (2015). Tremewan, James ; Schlag, Karl ; Weele, Joel.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:18:y:2015:i:3:p:457-490.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Does displaying probabilities affect bidding in first-price auctions?. (2015). Ratan, Anmol.
    In: Economics Letters.
    RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:126:y:2015:i:c:p:119-121.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. A Penny for your Thoughts: A Survey of Methods of Eliciting Beliefs. (2014). Tremewan, James ; Schlag, Karl ; van der Weele, Joel.
    In: Vienna Economics Papers.
    RePEc:vie:viennp:vie1401.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. A Penny for Your Thoughts:A Survey of Methods for Eliciting Beliefs.. (2014). Schlag, Karl ; van der Weele, Joel ; Tremewan, James.
    In: Vienna Economics Papers.
    RePEc:vie:viennp:1401.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Multi-Object Auctions with Resale: An Experimental Analysis. (2013). Saral, Krista ; Pagnozzi, Marco.
    In: CSEF Working Papers.
    RePEc:sef:csefwp:328.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Multi-Object Auctions with Resale: An Experimental Analysis. (2013). Saral, Krista ; Pagnozzi, Marco.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:43665.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Varying the number of bidders in the first-price sealed-bid auction: experimental evidence for the one-shot game. (2013). Neugebauer, Tibor ; Füllbrunn, Sascha ; Fullbrunn, Sascha.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:75:y:2013:i:3:p:421-447.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Varying the number of bidders in the first-price sealed-bid auction: experimental evidence for the one-shot game. (2013). Neugebauer, Tibor ; Fllbrunn, Sascha.
    In: LSF Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:crf:wpaper:13-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Eliciting Beliefs in Continuous-Choice Games: A Double Auction Experiment. (2012). Neri, Claudia.
    In: Economics Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:usg:econwp:2012:07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Static vs Dynamic Auctions with Ambiguity Averse Bidders. (2012). Carvalho, M.
    In: Other publications TiSEM.
    RePEc:tiu:tiutis:1f078e67-88ec-46e3-ae18-14bb0bbe12c4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Static vs Dynamic Auctions with Ambiguity Averse Bidders. (2012). Carvalho, M..
    In: Discussion Paper.
    RePEc:tiu:tiucen:1f078e67-88ec-46e3-ae18-14bb0bbe12c4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Allotment In First-Price Auctions: An Experimental Investigation.. (2012). Valbonesi, Paola ; Sausgruber, Rupert ; Galavotti, Stefano ; Corazzini, Luca.
    In: Marco Fanno Working Papers.
    RePEc:pad:wpaper:0153.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Belief Elicitation : A Horse Race among Truth Serums. (2011). Trautmann, Stefan ; Kuilen, Gijs ; van De, G.
    In: Other publications TiSEM.
    RePEc:tiu:tiutis:c62319d0-674f-4def-8e9f-d19faff3ca6f.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Essays in behavioral microeconomic theory. (2011). Carvalho, M..
    In: Other publications TiSEM.
    RePEc:tiu:tiutis:97fbb10e-5f12-420b-b8c4-e96a853a900c.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Belief Elicitation : A Horse Race among Truth Serums. (2011). Trautmann, Stefan ; Kuilen, Gijs ; van de Kuilen, G..
    In: Discussion Paper.
    RePEc:tiu:tiucen:c62319d0-674f-4def-8e9f-d19faff3ca6f.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. The strategy versus the direct-response method: a first survey of experimental comparisons. (2011). Charness, Gary ; Brandts, Jordi.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:14:y:2011:i:3:p:375-398.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Framing effects in public goods: Prospect Theory and experimental evidence. (2011). Ponti, Giovanni ; Iturbe-Ormaetxe, Inigo ; Ubeda, Luis ; Tomas, Josefa.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:72:y:2011:i:2:p:439-447.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  51. Eliciting Beliefs: Proper Scoring Rules, Incentives, Stakes and Hedging. (2010). TREICH, Nicolas ; Armantier, Olivier.
    In: TSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:wpaper:23866.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  52. Eliciting Beliefs: Proper Scoring Rules, Incentives, Stakes and Hedging. (2010). TREICH, Nicolas ; Armantier, Olivier.
    In: TSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:wpaper:22664.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  53. Belief elicitation in experiments: is there a hedging problem?. (2010). Normann, Hans-Theo ; Koch, Alexander ; Engelmann, Dirk ; Blanco, Mariana.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:13:y:2010:i:4:p:412-438.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  54. Applying Quadratic Scoring Rule transparently in multiple choice settings: A note. (2010). Sääksvuori, Lauri ; Koppel, Hannes ; Exadaktylos, Filippos ; Artinger, Florian ; Saaksvuori, Lauri.
    In: Jena Economics Research Papers.
    RePEc:jrp:jrpwrp:2010-021.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  55. Eliciting Beliefs: Proper Scoring Rules, Incentives, Stakes and Hedging. (2010). TREICH, Nicolas ; Armantier, Olivier.
    In: IDEI Working Papers.
    RePEc:ide:wpaper:23504.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  56. Anticipated loser regret in third price auctions. (2010). Ozbay, Erkut ; Filiz-Ozbay, Emel.
    In: Economics Letters.
    RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:107:y:2010:i:2:p:217-219.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  57. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  58. Too much cocited documents. This list is not complete

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-27 13:06:42 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.