create a website

Does online fundraising increase charitable giving? A nationwide field experiment on Facebook. (2022). Adena, Maja ; Hager, Anselm.
In: Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change.
RePEc:zbw:wzbeoc:spii2020302r.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 53

References cited by this document

Cocites: 29

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Social media charity campaigns and pro-social behavior. Evidence from the Ice Bucket Challenge. (2023). Scervini, Francesco ; Reggiani, Tommaso ; Fazio, Andrea.
    In: MUNI ECON Working Papers.
    RePEc:mub:wpaper:2022-09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Social media charity campaigns and pro-social behaviour. Evidence from the Ice Bucket Challenge. (2023). Scervini, Francesco ; Reggiani, Tommaso ; Fazio, Andrea ; Corazzini, Luca ; Antinyan, Armenak.
    In: Cardiff Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:cdf:wpaper:2023/6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Adena, M. (2016). Nonprofit organizations, free media and donor’s trust. Journal of Economics, 118(3):239–263.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Adena, M. and Huck, S. (2019a). Giving once, giving twice: A two-period field experiment on intertemporal crowding in charitable giving. Journal of Public Economics, 172:127–134.

  3. Adena, M. and Huck, S. (2019b). Personalized fundraising: A field experiment on threshold matching of donations. WZB Discussion Paper SP II 2019–306r.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Adena, M. and Huck, S. (2020). Online Fundraising, Self-Image, and the Long-Term Impact of Ask Avoidance. Management Science, 66(2):722–743.

  5. Adena, M., Huck, S., and Rasul, I. (2014). Charitable Giving and Nonbinding Contribution-Level Suggestions Evidence from a Field Experiment. Review of Behavioral Economics, 1(3):275–293.

  6. Altmann, S., Falk, A., Heidhues, P., Jayaraman, R., and Teirlinck, M. (2018). Defaults and Donations: Evidence from a Field Experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 101(5):808–826.

  7. Andreoni, J. (1995). Warm-Glow versus Cold-Prickle: The Effects of Positive and Negative Framing on Cooperation in Experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(1):1–21.

  8. Andreoni, J. and Rao, J. M. (2011). The power of asking: How communication affects selfishness, empathy, and altruism. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7-8):513–520.

  9. Banerjee, A., Banerji, R., Berry, J., Duflo, E., Kannan, H., Mukerji, S., Shotland, M., and Walton, M. (2017a). From proof of concept to scalable policies: Challenges and solutions, with an application. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(4):73–102.

  10. Banerjee, A., Chandrasekhar, A. G., Duflo, E., and Jackson, M. O. (2019). Using Gossips to Spread Information: Theory and Evidence from Two Randomized Controlled Trials. Review of Economic Studies, 86(6):2453–2490.

  11. Banerjee, A., Chassang, S., and Snowberg, E. (2017b). Decision Theoretic Approaches to Experiment Design and External Validity. In Banerjee, A. V. and Duflo, E., editors, Handbook of Economic Field Experiments (Vol. 1, pp. 141-174). NorthHolland.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Bertrand, M., Karlan, D., Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E., and Zinman, J. (2010). What’s advertising content worth? Evidence from a consumer credit marketing field experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1):263–306.

  13. Bilodeaua, M. and Slivinski, A. (1997). Rival charities. Journal of Public Economics, 66(3):449–467.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Blake, T., Nosko, C., and Tadelis, S. (2015). Consumer Heterogeneity and Paid Search Effectiveness: A Large-Scale Field Experiment. Econometrica, 83(1):155–174.

  15. Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., and Fowler, J. H. (2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489(7415):295–298.

  16. Bøg, M., Harmgart, H., Huck, S., and Jeffers, A. M. (2012). Fundraising on the internet. Kyklos, 65(1):18–30.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Castillo, M., Petrie, R., and Wardell, C. (2014). Fundraising through online social networks: A field experiment on peer-to-peer solicitation. Journal of Public Economics, 114:29–35.

  18. Chen, Y., Li, X., and MacKie-Mason, J. (2005). Online Fund-raising Mechanisms: A Field Experiment. Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy, 5(2):Article 4.

  19. Cohen, J. and Dupas, P. (2010). Free Distribution or Cost-Sharing? Evidence from a Randomized Malaria Prevention Experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1):1–45.

  20. Deryugina, T. and Marx, B. M. (2021). Is the Supply of Charitable Donations Fixed? Evidence from Tornadoes. American Economic Review: Insights, 3(3):383–98.

  21. Donkers, B., van Diepen, M., and Franses, P. H. (2017). Do charities get more when they ask more often? Evidence from a unique field experiment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 66:58–65.

  22. Drago, F., Mengel, F., and Traxler, C. (2020). Compliance Behavior in Networks: Evidence from a Field Experiment. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 12(2):96–133.

  23. Eckel, C., Grossman, P. J., and Milano, A. (2007). Is more information always better ? An experimental study of charitable giving and Hurricane Katrina. Southern Economic Journal, 74(2):388–411.

  24. Faizullabhoy, I. and Korolova, A. (2018). Facebook’s advertising platform: New attack vectors and the need for interventions.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Filiz-Ozbay, E. and Uler, N. (2019). Demand for giving to multiple charities: An experimental study. Journal of the European Economic Association, 17(3):725–753.

  26. Gallier, C., Goeschl, T., Kesternich, M., Lohse, J., Reif, C., and Römer, D. (2019). Inter-charity competition under spatial differentiation: Sorting, crowding, and spillovers. ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, (19039) :1–34.

  27. Gee, L. K. and Meer, J. (2019). The Altruism Budget: Measuring and Encouraging Charitable Giving. In Powell, W. W. and Bromley, P., editors, The Nonprofit Sector A Research Handbook, Third Edition (pp. 558-565). Stanford University Press.

  28. Gneezy, U., Keenan, E. A., and Gneezy, A. (2014). Avoiding overhead aversion in charity. Science, 346(6209):632–5.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Grieder, M. and Schmitz, J. (2020). Moral licensing or substitution? The impact of multiple opportunities to give on contributions to charity – Evidence from the field and the lab. pages 1–34.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Hager, A. (2018). Do Online Ads Sway Elections? Evidence from a Field Experiment. Mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Hager, A. (2019). Do online ads influence vote choice? Political Communication, 36(3):376–393.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Heß, S. (2017). Randomization inference with Stata: A guide and software. Stata Journal, 17(3):630–651(22).

  33. Jayaraman, R., Kaiser, M., and Teirlinck, M. (2020). Charitable Donations to Natural Disasters: Evidence From an Online Platform.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Johnson, G. A., Lewis, R. A., and Nubbemeyer, E. I. (2017). Ghost Ads: Improving the Economics of Measuring Online Ad Effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(6):867–884.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Kamdar, A., Levitt, S. D., List, J. A., Mullaney, B., and Syverson, C. (2015). Once and Done: Leveraging Behavioral Economics to Increase Charitable Contributions.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Kessler, J. B. and Milkman, K. L. (2018). Identity in Charitable Giving. Management Science, 64(2):845–859.

  37. Krieg, J. and Samek, A. (2017). When charities compete: A laboratory experiment with simultaneous public goods. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 66:40–57.

  38. Lacetera, N., Macis, M., and Slonim, R. (2012). Will there be blood? Incentives and substitution effects in pro-social behavior. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4(1):186–223.

  39. Lambrecht, A. and Tucker, C. (2019). Algorithmic Bias? An Empirical Study of Apparent Gender-Based Discrimination in the Display of STEM Career Ads. Management Science, 65(7):2966–2981.

  40. Landry, C. E., Lange, A., List, J. A., Price, M. K., and Rupp, N. G. (2006). Toward an Understanding of the Economics of Charity: Evidence from a Field Experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2):747–782.

  41. Lange, A. and Stocking, A. (2012). The Complementarities of Competition in Charitable Fundraising. Congressional Budget Office Washington, DC Working Paper, 32.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Lewis, R. A. and Rao, J. M. (2015). The unfavorable economics of measuring the returns to advertising. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(4):1941–1973.

  43. Lewis, R. A. and Reiley, D. H. (2014). Online ads and offline sales: Measuring the effect of retail advertising via a controlled experiment on Yahoo! Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 12(3):235–266.

  44. Lewis, R. A., Rao, J. M., and Reiley, D. H. (2015). Measuring the Effects of Advertising: the digital frontier (pp. 191-218). In Goldfarb, A., Greenstein, S. M., and Tucker, C. E., editors, Economic Analysis of the Digital Economy. University of Chicago Press.

  45. Meer, J. (2014). Effects of the price of charitable giving: Evidence from an online crowdfunding platform. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 103:113– 124.

  46. Meer, J. (2017). Does fundraising create new giving? Journal of Public Economics, 145:82–93.

  47. Meier, S. (2007). Do Subsidies Increase Charitable Giving in the Long Run? Matching Donations in a Field Experiment. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(6):1203–1222.

  48. Müller, S. and Rau, H. A. (2019). Too cold for warm glow? Christmas-season effects in charitable giving. PLoS ONE, 14(5):1–13.

  49. Petrova, M., Perez-Truglia, R., Simonov, A., and Yildirim, P. (2019). Are Political and Charitable Giving Substitutes? Evidence from the United States. SSRN Electronic Journal.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Reinstein, D. (2011). Does One Charitable Contribution Come at the Expense of Another? The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 11(1):Article 40.

  51. Reinstein, D. and Riener, G. (2012). Substitution Among Charitable Contributions. Convergent Lab and Field Evidence.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1982). Charitable Giving and ”Excessive” Fundraising. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97(2):193–212.

  53. Scharf, K., Smith, S., and Ottoni-Wilhelm, M. (2017). Lift and Shift: The Effect of Fundraising Interventions in Charity Space and Time.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Behavioral spillovers. (2025). Bonev, Petyo.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:229:y:2025:i:c:s0167268124004712.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Does online fundraising increase charitable giving? A nationwide field experiment on Facebook. (2024). Adena, Maja ; Hager, Anselm.
    In: Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change.
    RePEc:zbw:wzbeoc:spii2020302r2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Asking to give: coordinated fundraising and giving. (2024). Schmitz, Jan ; Grieder, Manuel ; Schubert, Renate.
    In: VfS Annual Conference 2024 (Berlin): Upcoming Labor Market Challenges.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc24:302438.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. One thing leads to another: Evidence on the scope and persistence of behavioral spillovers. (2024). Mayr, Harald ; Schubert, Renate ; Goetz, Alexander.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:236:y:2024:i:c:s0047272724001026.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Wealth and charitable giving – Evidence from an Ethiopian lottery. (2024). Somville, Vincent ; Kotsadam, Andreas.
    In: Journal of Development Economics.
    RePEc:eee:deveco:v:167:y:2024:i:c:s0304387823002067.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Life is too short to be small: An experiment on mortality salience and prosocial behavior. (2024). Bao, Te ; Li, Xun ; Xia, Congling.
    In: China Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:chieco:v:86:y:2024:i:c:s1043951x24000804.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Get the happiness out–An online experiment on the causal effects of positive emotions on giving. (2023). Schobin, Janosch ; Leon, Anja Kbrich.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0290283.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. A Glimpse into the world of high capacity givers: Experimental evidence from a university capital campaign. (2023). List, John ; Levin, Tova ; Levitt, Steven D.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:212:y:2023:i:c:p:644-658.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Does additional demand for charitable aid increase giving? Evidence from Hurricane Sandy. (2023). Schwirplies, Claudia.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:209:y:2023:i:c:p:53-73.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Quality-Aware Tax Incentives for Charitable Contributions. (2023). Halberstam, Zachary ; Hines, James R.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_10250.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Does online fundraising increase charitable giving? A nationwide field experiment on Facebook. (2022). Adena, Maja ; Hager, Anselm.
    In: Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change.
    RePEc:zbw:wzbeoc:spii2020302r.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Intertemporal Prosocial Choice: The Inconsistency Puzzle. (2022). Islam, Marco.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2022_012.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Giving begets giving: Positive path dependence as moral consistency. (2022). Heger, Stephanie A ; Slonim, Robert.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:204:y:2022:i:c:p:699-718.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Incentives and intertemporal behavioral spillovers: A two-period experiment on charitable giving. (2022). Alt, Marius ; Gallier, Carlo.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:200:y:2022:i:c:p:959-972.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Personalized fundraising: A field experiment on threshold matching of donations. (2022). Huck, Steffen ; Adena, Maja.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:200:y:2022:i:c:p:1-20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Altruism Begets Altruism. (2022). Heger, Stephanie A ; Slonim, Robert.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_9522.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Incentives and intertemporal behavioral spillovers: A two-period experiment on charitable giving. (2021). Alt, Marius ; Gallier, Carlo.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:21010.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. How can we improve tax incentives for charitable giving? Lessons from field experiments in fundraising. (2021). Adena, Maja.
    In: EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters.
    RePEc:zbw:espost:251718.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Altruism born of suffering? The impact of an adverse health shock on pro-social behaviour. (2021). Smith, Sarah ; Petrie, Dennis ; Black, Nicole ; de Gruyter, Elaine.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:191:y:2021:i:c:p:902-915.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Altruism among consumers as donors. (2021). Tymula, Agnieszka ; Heger, Stephanie ; Slonim, Robert ; Tausch, Franziska.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:189:y:2021:i:c:p:611-622.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Water the flowers you want to grow? Evidence on private recognition and donor loyalty. (2021). Dwenger, Nadja ; Bittschi, Benjamin ; Rincke, Johannes.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:131:y:2021:i:c:s0014292120302543.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Does online fundraising increase charitable giving? A nation-wide field experiment on Facebook. (2020). Adena, Maja ; Hager, Anselm.
    In: Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change.
    RePEc:zbw:wzbeoc:spii2020302.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Independent vs. Coordinated Fundraising: Understanding the Role of Information. (2020). Uler, Neslihan ; Eckel, Catherine ; Guney, Begum.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:127:y:2020:i:c:s0014292120301082.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Altruism born of suffering? The impact of an adverse health shock on pro-social behaviour. (2020). Smith, Sarah ; Petrie, Dennis ; Black, Nicole ; de Gruyter, Elaine.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:15535.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Water the Flowers You Want to Grow? Evidence on Private Recognition and Donor Loyalty. (2020). Dwenger, Nadja ; Bittschi, Benjamin ; Rincke, Johannes.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:14996.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Water the Flowers You Want to Grow? Evidence on Private Recognition and Donor Loyalty. (2020). Dwenger, Nadja ; Bittschi, Benjamin ; Rincke, Johannes.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_8424.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Altruism born of suffering? The impact of an adverse health shock on pro-social behaviour. (2020). Smith, Sarah ; Petrie, Dennis ; Black, Nicole ; de Gruyter, Elaine.
    In: Bristol Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:bri:uobdis:20/736.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Inter-charity competition under spatial differentiation: Sorting, crowding, and spillovers. (2019). Lohse, Johannes ; Kesternich, Martin ; Goeschl, Timo ; Reif, Christiane ; Gallier, Carlo ; Romer, Daniel.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:19039.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Inter-charity competition under spatial differentiation: Sorting, crowding, and splillovers. (2019). Lohse, Johannes ; Kesternich, Martin ; Goeschl, Timo ; Roemer, Daniel ; Reif, Christiane ; Gallier, Carlo.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:bir:birmec:19-08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-22 19:46:01 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.