This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TB0298
Case T-298/13: Order of the General Court of 11 November 2014 — LemonAid Beverages v OHIM — Pret a Manger (Europe) (LemonAid) (Community trade mark — Application for a declaration of invalidity — Withdrawal of the application — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-298/13: Order of the General Court of 11 November 2014 — LemonAid Beverages v OHIM — Pret a Manger (Europe) (LemonAid) (Community trade mark — Application for a declaration of invalidity — Withdrawal of the application — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-298/13: Order of the General Court of 11 November 2014 — LemonAid Beverages v OHIM — Pret a Manger (Europe) (LemonAid) (Community trade mark — Application for a declaration of invalidity — Withdrawal of the application — No need to adjudicate)
OJ C 26, 26.1.2015, pp. 32–32
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
26.1.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 26/32 |
Order of the General Court of 11 November 2014 — LemonAid Beverages v OHIM — Pret a Manger (Europe) (LemonAid)
(Case T-298/13) (1)
((Community trade mark - Application for a declaration of invalidity - Withdrawal of the application - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 026/40)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: LemonAid Beverages GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: U. Lüken and J. Natzel, lawyers, and P. Brownlow, Solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Pret a Manger (Europe) Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Tsoutsanis, lawyer, and S. Croxon, Solicitor)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 March 2013 (Case R 276/2012-2), relating to invalidity proceedings between Pret à Manger (Europe) Ltd and LemonAid Beverages GmbH.
Operative part of the order
1. |
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
2. |
The applicant and the intervener shall each bear their own costs and each shall pay one half of the costs incurred by the defendant. |