Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62015TN0715

Case T-715/15: Action brought on 4 December 2015 — BBY Solutions v OHIM — Worldwide Sales Corporation España (BEST BUY GEEK SQUAD)

OJ C 59, 15.2.2016, pp. 35–36 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

15.2.2016   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 59/35

Action brought on 4 December 2015 — BBY Solutions v OHIM — Worldwide Sales Corporation España (BEST BUY GEEK SQUAD)

(Case T-715/15)

(2016/C 059/40)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: BBY Solutions, Inc. (Minneapolis, United States) (represented by: A. Poulter, Solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Worldwide Sales Corporation España, SL (Sant Vicenç dels Horts, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘BEST BUY GEEK SQUAD’ — Community trade mark application No 6 064 001

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 September 2015 in Joined Cases R 517/2015-2 and R 437/2015-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision to the extent that it upheld the opposition;

—

annul the opposition division’s decision dated 22 December 2014 in Opposition No B 1354630 to the extent that it upheld the opposition;

—

accept CTM Application No 6 064 001 for registration;

—

order OHIM to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.

Plea in law

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Top