This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TN0015
Case T-15/16: Action brought on 14 January 2016 — Pandalis v OHIM– LR Health & Beauty Systems (Cystus)
Case T-15/16: Action brought on 14 January 2016 — Pandalis v OHIM– LR Health & Beauty Systems (Cystus)
Case T-15/16: Action brought on 14 January 2016 — Pandalis v OHIM– LR Health & Beauty Systems (Cystus)
OJ C 90, 7.3.2016, pp. 25–25
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
7.3.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 90/25 |
Action brought on 14 January 2016 — Pandalis v OHIM– LR Health & Beauty Systems (Cystus)
(Case T-15/16)
(2016/C 090/33)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Georgios Pandalis (Glandorf, Germany) (represented by: A. Franke, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: LR Health & Beauty Systems GmbH (Ahlen, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Cystus’ — Community mark No 1 273 119
Procedure before OHIM: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 October 2015 in Case R 2839/2014-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision relating to Invalidity proceedings No 8374 C and Community mark No 1 273 119 ‘Cystus’; |
|
— |
order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 64(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 in conjunction with Article 51(1)(a) and (2) thereof; |
|
— |
Misuse of powers; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009. |