This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016CA0300
Case C-300/16 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 September 2017 — European Commission v Frucona Košice a.s. (Appeal — State aid — Concept of ‘aid’ — Concept of ‘economic advantage’ — Private creditor test — Conditions of applicability — Application — Investigation obligations on the European Commission)
Case C-300/16 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 September 2017 — European Commission v Frucona Košice a.s. (Appeal — State aid — Concept of ‘aid’ — Concept of ‘economic advantage’ — Private creditor test — Conditions of applicability — Application — Investigation obligations on the European Commission)
Case C-300/16 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 September 2017 — European Commission v Frucona Košice a.s. (Appeal — State aid — Concept of ‘aid’ — Concept of ‘economic advantage’ — Private creditor test — Conditions of applicability — Application — Investigation obligations on the European Commission)
OJ C 382, 13.11.2017, pp. 24–24
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
13.11.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 382/24 |
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 September 2017 — European Commission v Frucona Košice a.s.
(Case C-300/16 P) (1)
((Appeal - State aid - Concept of ‘aid’ - Concept of ‘economic advantage’ - Private creditor test - Conditions of applicability - Application - Investigation obligations on the European Commission))
(2017/C 382/27)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: European Commission (represented by: K. Walkerová, L. Armati, T. Maxian Rusche and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings: Frucona Košice a.s. (represented by: K. Lasok QC, B. Hartnett, Barrister, J. Holmes QC, and O. Geiss, Rechtsanwalt)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal; |
|
2. |
Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |