Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019CA0274

Case C-274/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 October 2020 — Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission (Appeal — Arbitration clause — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 — Regulation (EC) No 1906/2006 — Actibio grant agreement — Actibio project — Seventh framework programme — Eligible costs — Conflict of interests — Burden of proof — Time sheets — Audit report — Probative value — Principle of proportionality)

OJ C 433, 14.12.2020, pp. 10–10 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

14.12.2020   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/10


Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 October 2020 — Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission

(Case C-274/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Arbitration clause - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 - Regulation (EC) No 1906/2006 - Actibio grant agreement - Actibio project - Seventh framework programme - Eligible costs - Conflict of interests - Burden of proof - Time sheets - Audit report - Probative value - Principle of proportionality)

(2020/C 433/10)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) (represented by: V. Christianos, dikigoros)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: O. Verheecke and A. Katsimerou, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

2.

Orders Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.


Top