Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019TB0367(01)

Case T-367/19: Order of the General Court of 24 November 2020 — Camerin v Commission (Action for annulment — Civil service — Officials — Deductions from a retirement pension — Enforcement of a decision of a national court — No need to adjudicate — Liability — Inadmissibility)

OJ C 28, 25.1.2021, pp. 49–50 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

25.1.2021   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/49


Order of the General Court of 24 November 2020 — Camerin v Commission

(Case T-367/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Civil service - Officials - Deductions from a retirement pension - Enforcement of a decision of a national court - No need to adjudicate - Liability - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 28/75)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Laure Camerin (Bastia, France) (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment in part of the decision of the Office for Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of the Commission of 17 April 2019 regarding the enforcement of a garnishee order issued by a Belgian court, in so far as the PMO reserves the right to deduct from pension payments that the applicant is yet to receive additional amounts within the limits set by Belgian law and, second, compensation for the non-material damage allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for annulment in part of the decision of the Office for Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of the European Commission of 17 April 2019 regarding the enforcement of a garnishee order.

2.

The claim for damages is dismissed as inadmissible.

3.

Ms Laure Camerin shall pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.


(1)  OJ C 270, 12.8.2019.


Top