This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021CA0507
Case C-507/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 September 2022 — Puma SE and Others v European Commission (Appeal — Dumping — Imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China and Vietnam — Implementation of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 — Reimposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty — Competence ratione temporis — Principle of non-discrimination)
Case C-507/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 September 2022 — Puma SE and Others v European Commission (Appeal — Dumping — Imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China and Vietnam — Implementation of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 — Reimposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty — Competence ratione temporis — Principle of non-discrimination)
Case C-507/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 September 2022 — Puma SE and Others v European Commission (Appeal — Dumping — Imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China and Vietnam — Implementation of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 — Reimposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty — Competence ratione temporis — Principle of non-discrimination)
OJ C 408, 24.10.2022, pp. 22–23
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
24.10.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 408/22 |
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 September 2022 — Puma SE and Others v European Commission
(Case C-507/21 P) (1)
(Appeal - Dumping - Imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China and Vietnam - Implementation of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 - Reimposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty - Competence ratione temporis - Principle of non-discrimination)
(2022/C 408/26)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellants: Puma SE, Puma United Kingdom Ltd, Puma Nordic AB, Austria Puma Dassler GmbH, Puma Italia Srl, Puma France SAS, Puma Denmark A/S, Puma Iberia SL, Puma Retail AG (represented by: J. Cornelis and E. Vermulst, advocaten)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati, G. Luengo and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal; |
|
2. |
Orders Puma SE, Puma United Kingdom Ltd, Puma Nordic AB, Austria Puma Dassler GmbH, Puma Italia Srl, Puma France SAS, Puma Denmark A/S, Puma Iberia SL and Puma Retail AG to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |