Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62022CN0427

Case C-427/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 28 June 2022 — Criminal proceedings against BG

OJ C 408, 24.10.2022, pp. 27–27 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

24.10.2022   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/27


Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 28 June 2022 — Criminal proceedings against BG

(Case C-427/22)

(2022/C 408/36)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Varhoven kasatsionen sad

Party to the main proceedings

BG

Questions referred

1.

Is the definition of a credit institution in Article 4(1)(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 to be interpreted as meaning that credit is to be granted exclusively from funds received from the public as deposits or other repayable funds, or may a credit institution also grant credit from funds from other sources?

2.

How is the content of the ‘instrument […] in any form […] by which the right to carry out the business is granted’ within the meaning of Article 4(1)(42) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 to be interpreted, and does it include both the authorisation scheme and the registration scheme which grant approval for credit operations?


(1)   OJ 2013 L 176, p. 1.


Top