This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TN0552
Case T-552/22: Action brought on 7 September 2022 — mataharispaclub v EUIPO — Rouha (SpaClubMatahari)
Case T-552/22: Action brought on 7 September 2022 — mataharispaclub v EUIPO — Rouha (SpaClubMatahari)
Case T-552/22: Action brought on 7 September 2022 — mataharispaclub v EUIPO — Rouha (SpaClubMatahari)
OJ C 408, 24.10.2022, pp. 41–42
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
24.10.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 408/41 |
Action brought on 7 September 2022 — mataharispaclub v EUIPO — Rouha (SpaClubMatahari)
(Case T-552/22)
(2022/C 408/55)
Language in which the application was lodged: Czech
Parties
Applicant: mataharispaclub s.r.o. (Mníšek pod Brdy, Czech Republic) (represented by: M. Diamant, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Alena Rouha (Prague, Czech Republic)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘SpaClubMatahari’ — EU trade mark No 17 642 661
Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 June 2022 in Case R 937/2021-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |