This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62023CN0410
Case C-410/23, Pielatak: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 3 July 2023 – I. SA v S.J.
Case C-410/23, Pielatak: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 3 July 2023 – I. SA v S.J.
Case C-410/23, Pielatak: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 3 July 2023 – I. SA v S.J.
OJ C, C/2024/2911, 6.5.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2911/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2911/oj
![]() |
Official Journal |
EN C series |
C/2024/2911 |
6.5.2024 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 3 July 2023 – I. SA v S.J.
(Case C-410/23, Pielatak) (1)
(C/2024/2911)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: I. SA
Defendant: S.J.
Questions referred
1. |
Do Article 2(b) and (c) of Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts and the definition of consumer (2) contained therein, and recital 17 of Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, (3) also cover a farmer who concludes a contract for the purchase of electricity both for an agricultural holding and for private purposes for a household? |
2. |
Must Article 3(5) and (7) of and recital 51 and Annex I(1)(a) and (e) to Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 2003/54/EC, (4) which requires that no charge be levied on consumers in the event of withdrawal from a contract for the provision of electricity services, be interpreted as precluding the possibility of imposing a contractual penalty on an energy consumer customer for the termination of a fixed-term contract for the provision of electricity (Article 4j(3a) of the Polish Law on energy of 10 April 1997)? |
(1) This case has been given a fictitious name which does not correspond to the real name of any of the parties to the proceedings.
(2) OJ. 1993 L 95, p. 29; Polish Special Edition: Chapter 15 Volume 002 P. 288 – 293.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2911/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)