This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TN0615
Case T-615/17: Action brought on 8 September 2017 — Ardigo and UO v Commission
Case T-615/17: Action brought on 8 September 2017 — Ardigo and UO v Commission
Case T-615/17: Action brought on 8 September 2017 — Ardigo and UO v Commission
OJ C 382, 13.11.2017, pp. 50–50
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
13.11.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 382/50 |
Action brought on 8 September 2017 — Ardigo and UO v Commission
(Case T-615/17)
(2017/C 382/62)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: Nicola Ardigo (Lissone, Italy) and UO (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
— |
Declare and rule that
|
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on tow pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging infringement by the Appointing Authority of Article 7(1) of the General Implementing Provisions (GIPs) of 3 March 2011 in the calculation by that Authority of the deduction of the amount representing the increase in value of that capital between the date of the application for transfer and that of the actual transfer. |
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging infringement of essential procedural measures, namely breaches by the Appointing Authority of its obligations to state reasons and to establish, through the GIPs, the mathematical formula by which it calculated the coefficients necessary for the conversion of the capital transferred into years of pensionable service. |