Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014CN0117

Case C-117/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 23 de Madrid (Spain) lodged on 11 March 2014  — Grima Janet Nisttahuz Poclava v José María Ariza Toledano (Taberna del Marqués)

OJ C 151, 19.5.2014, pp. 14–14 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

19.5.2014   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/14


Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 23 de Madrid (Spain) lodged on 11 March 2014 — Grima Janet Nisttahuz Poclava v José María Ariza Toledano (Taberna del Marqués)

(Case C-117/14)

2014/C 151/17

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Social No 23 de Madrid

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Grima Janet Nisttahuz Poclava

Defendant: José María Ariza Toledano (Taberna del Marqués)

Questions referred

1.

Is national legislation under which employment contracts of indefinite duration to support entrepreneurs are made subject to a probationary period of one year, during which the employee may freely be dismissed, contrary to EU law, and is it compatible with the fundamental right guaranteed by Article 30 (1) of the [Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union]?

2.

Is the probationary period of one year to which employment contracts of indefinite duration to support entrepreneurs are made subject prejudicial to the objectives of, and to the rules laid down in, Directive 1999/70/EC (2) concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — clauses 1 and 3?


(1)  OJ 2000, C 364, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 175, p. 43.


Top