Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62016TN0652

Case T-652/16 P: Appeal brought on 16 September 2016 by HD against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 21 July 2016 in Case F-136/15, HD v Parliament

OJ C 419, 14.11.2016, pp. 51–52 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

14.11.2016   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 419/51

Appeal brought on 16 September 2016 by HD against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 21 July 2016 in Case F-136/15, HD v Parliament

(Case T-652/16 P)

(2016/C 419/68)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: HD (Aach, Germany) (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament

Form of order sought by the appellant

The appellant claims that the Court should:

—

declare the present appeal admissible;

—

set aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal of 21 July 2016, HD v Parliament (F-136/15);

—

grant the appellant’s claim for annulment made at first instance;

—

order the Parliament to pay the costs of both instances.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on two grounds.

1.

First ground of appeal, alleging distortion of the facts and evidence, manifest error of assessment and infringement of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ 2001, L 8, p. 1).

2.

Second ground of appeal, alleging a failure to state reasons for the judgment under appeal.
Top