This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TB0151
Case T-151/21: Order of the General Court of 25 March 2022 — Saure v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Commission correspondence concerning the quantity and delivery timings of BioNTech SE COVID-19 vaccines — Initial refusal — Act not open to challenge — Application to modify the form of order sought — Assessing the admissibility of an action at the time it was brought — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-151/21: Order of the General Court of 25 March 2022 — Saure v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Commission correspondence concerning the quantity and delivery timings of BioNTech SE COVID-19 vaccines — Initial refusal — Act not open to challenge — Application to modify the form of order sought — Assessing the admissibility of an action at the time it was brought — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-151/21: Order of the General Court of 25 March 2022 — Saure v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Commission correspondence concerning the quantity and delivery timings of BioNTech SE COVID-19 vaccines — Initial refusal — Act not open to challenge — Application to modify the form of order sought — Assessing the admissibility of an action at the time it was brought — Manifest inadmissibility)
OJ C 222, 7.6.2022, pp. 28–28
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 222, 7.6.2022, pp. 26–26
(GA)
|
7.6.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 222/28 |
Order of the General Court of 25 March 2022 — Saure v Commission
(Case T-151/21) (1)
(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Commission correspondence concerning the quantity and delivery timings of BioNTech SE COVID-19 vaccines - Initial refusal - Act not open to challenge - Application to modify the form of order sought - Assessing the admissibility of an action at the time it was brought - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2022/C 222/47)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Hans-Wilhem Saure (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: C. Partsch, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Spina, K. Herrmann and G. Gattinara, agents)
Re:
By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks to have set aside the letter of the European Commission of 27 January 2021 rejecting an initial application for access to certain documents.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible. |
|
2. |
M. Hans-Wilhelm Saure shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and those relating to the requests to modify the application and the European Commission shall bear its own costs related to the application. |