This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010FB0033
Case F-33/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 22 June 2011 — Lebedef v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Appraisal for the year 2005 — Career development report — General provisions implementing Article 43 of the Staff Regulations — Report drawn up following the judgment in Case F-36/07 — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case F-33/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 22 June 2011 — Lebedef v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Appraisal for the year 2005 — Career development report — General provisions implementing Article 43 of the Staff Regulations — Report drawn up following the judgment in Case F-36/07 — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case F-33/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 22 June 2011 — Lebedef v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Appraisal for the year 2005 — Career development report — General provisions implementing Article 43 of the Staff Regulations — Report drawn up following the judgment in Case F-36/07 — Manifest inadmissibility)
OJ C 232, 6.8.2011, pp. 42–42
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
6.8.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 232/42 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 22 June 2011 — Lebedef v Commission
(Case F-33/10) (1)
(Staff case - Officials - Appraisal for the year 2005 - Career development report - General provisions implementing Article 43 of the Staff Regulations - Report drawn up following the judgment in Case F-36/07 - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2011/C 232/75)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Giorgio Lebedef (Senningerberg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and G. Berscheid, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the applicant’s career development report for the period from 1 January 2005 till 31 December 2005, as drawn up following its annulment by the Civil Service Tribunal in its judgment in Case F-36/07.
Operative part of the order
The Tribunal
|
1. |
Dismisses the action as manifestly inadmissible; |
|
2. |
Orders Mr Lebedef to pay all the costs. |