This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TA0353
Cases T-353/14 and T-17/15: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — Italy v Commission (Language regime — Notice of open competition for the recruitment of administrators — Choice of second language from three languages — Regulation No 1 — Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations — Principle of non-discrimination — Proportionality)
Cases T-353/14 and T-17/15: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — Italy v Commission (Language regime — Notice of open competition for the recruitment of administrators — Choice of second language from three languages — Regulation No 1 — Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations — Principle of non-discrimination — Proportionality)
Cases T-353/14 and T-17/15: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — Italy v Commission (Language regime — Notice of open competition for the recruitment of administrators — Choice of second language from three languages — Regulation No 1 — Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations — Principle of non-discrimination — Proportionality)
OJ C 392, 24.10.2016, pp. 26–27
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
24.10.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 392/26 |
Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — Italy v Commission
(Cases T-353/14 and T-17/15) (1)
((Language regime - Notice of open competition for the recruitment of administrators - Choice of second language from three languages - Regulation No 1 - Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations - Principle of non-discrimination - Proportionality))
(2016/C 392/31)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and by P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially J. Currall and G. Gattinara (Cases T-353/14 and T-17/15) and F. Simonetti (Case T-17/15), then G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the applicant: Republic of Lithuania (represented by: D. Kriaučiūnas and V. Čepaitė, acting as Agents)
Re:
In Case T-353/14, application based on Article 263 TFEU and asking for annulment of the notice of open competition EPSO/AD/276/14, to constitute a reserve list for administrators (OJ 2014 C 74 A, p. 4), and, in Case T-17/15, application based on Article 263 TFEU and asking for annulment of the notice of open competition EPSO/AD/294/14 to constitute a reserve list of administrators in the field of data protection for the European Data Protection Supervisor (OJ 2014 C 391 A, p. 1.)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1) |
Joins Cases T-353/14 and T-17/15 for the purposes of the judgment; |
|
2) |
Annuls the notice of open competition EPSO/AD/276/14, to constitute a reserve list for administrators and the notice of open competition EPSO/AD/294/14 to constitute a reserve list of administrators in the field of data protection for the European Data Protection Supervisor; |
|
3) |
Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Italian Republic; |
|
4) |
Orders the Republic of Lithuania to bear its own costs relating to its intervention in Case T-17/15. |