Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62009FA0007

Case F-7/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 23 February 2010 — Faria v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Staff cases — Officials — Reports — Evaluation report — 2006/2007 evaluation period — Application for annulment of the evaluation report — Manifest error of assessment — Compensation for non-material damage)

IO C 134, 22.5.2010, pp. 51–51 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

22.5.2010   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/51


Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 23 February 2010 — Faria v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case F-7/09) (1)

(Staff cases - Officials - Reports - Evaluation report - 2006/2007 evaluation period - Application for annulment of the evaluation report - Manifest error of assessment - Compensation for non-material damage)

2010/C 134/84

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Marie-Hélène Faria (Muchamiel, Spain) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: I. de Medrano Caballero, Agent, assisted by D. Waelbroeck, lawyer)

Re:

Annulment of the evaluation report in respect of the period from 1 October 2006 to 30 September 2007, and an order that the defendant pay compensation for the loss suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1.

Annuls Ms Faria's evaluation report, drawn up by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) in respect of the period from 1 October 2006 to 30 September 2007;

2.

For the rest, dismisses the action;

3.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay three quarters of Ms Faria's costs;

4.

Orders Ms Faria to bear one quarter of her own costs.


(1)  OJ C 69 of 21.03.2009, p. 55.


Top