This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TA0250
Case T-250/13: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2015 — Naazneen Investments v OHIM — Energy Brands (SMART WATER) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community word mark SMART WATER — Genuine use — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
Case T-250/13: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2015 — Naazneen Investments v OHIM — Energy Brands (SMART WATER) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community word mark SMART WATER — Genuine use — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
Case T-250/13: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2015 — Naazneen Investments v OHIM — Energy Brands (SMART WATER) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community word mark SMART WATER — Genuine use — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
IO C 146, 4.5.2015, pp. 36–37
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
4.5.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 146/36 |
Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2015 — Naazneen Investments v OHIM — Energy Brands (SMART WATER)
(Case T-250/13) (1)
((Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Community word mark SMART WATER - Genuine use - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))
(2015/C 146/49)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Naazneen Investments Ltd (Limassol, Cyprus) (represented by: P. Goldenbaum, I. Rohr and T. Melchert, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Energy Brands, Inc. (New York, United States) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, and D. Stone, Solicitor)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 February 2013 (Case R 1101/2011-2), relating to revocation proceedings between Energy Brands, Inc. and Naazneen Investments Ltd.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Naazneen Investments Ltd to pay the costs. |