Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62013TN0645

Case T-645/13: Action brought on 29 November 2013 — Eycharis Nezi v OHIM — Etam (E)

IO C 61, 1.3.2014, pp. 9–10 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

1.3.2014   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/9

Action brought on 29 November 2013 — Eycharis Nezi v OHIM — Etam (E)

(Case T-645/13)

2014/C 61/15

Language in which the application was lodged: Greek

Parties

Applicant): Eycharis Nezi (Mykonos, Greece) (represented by: A Salkitzoglou, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Etam SAS (Clichy, France)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 October 2013 in Case R 329/2013-4;

—

vary the above decision so that the applicant’s mark is registered for all the goods and service which were applied for and,

—

order the opponent to pay all the applicant’s legal costs, including all costs of any interveners.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant.

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘Ε’, for goods and services in Classes 14, 16, 18, 25, 26, 35 and 40 — Community trade mark application No 8701138.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The opponent before the Board of Appeal.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The Community figurative mark ‘Ε’, for goods in Classes 3, 18 and 25.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partial annulment of the decision of the Opposition Division.

Pleas in law:

—

Infringement of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

—

Infringement of Article 4 of Regulation No 207/2009;

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation No 207/2009;

—

Infringement of Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009, and

—

Infringement of Articles 15 and 42 of Regulation No 207/2009.
Top