This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TN0567
Case T-567/15: Action brought on 25 September 2015 — Monster Energy v OHIM — Mad Catz Interactive (Representation of a black square with four white stripes)
Case T-567/15: Action brought on 25 September 2015 — Monster Energy v OHIM — Mad Catz Interactive (Representation of a black square with four white stripes)
Case T-567/15: Action brought on 25 September 2015 — Monster Energy v OHIM — Mad Catz Interactive (Representation of a black square with four white stripes)
IO C 381, 16.11.2015, pp. 55–55
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
16.11.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 381/55 |
Action brought on 25 September 2015 — Monster Energy v OHIM — Mad Catz Interactive (Representation of a black square with four white stripes)
(Case T-567/15)
(2015/C 381/65)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Monster Energy Company (Corona, United States) (represented by: P. Brownlow, Solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mad Catz Interactive, Inc. (San Diego, United States)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Figurative mark (representation of a black square with four white stripes) — Application for registration No 11 390 853
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 July 2015 in Case R 2368/2014-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the decision of the Board of Appeal of 4 May 2015 in Case R 2368/2014-5; |
|
— |
annul the decision of the Opposition Division of 1 July 2015 in opposition No B2182320; |
|
— |
reject the opposed mark in respect of class 25; |
|
— |
order OHIM to pay its own costs and those of the opponent. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(5) Regulation No 207/2009. |