This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TN0645
Case T-645/17: Action brought on 21 September 2017 — Rodonita v Commission and SRB
Case T-645/17: Action brought on 21 September 2017 — Rodonita v Commission and SRB
Case T-645/17: Action brought on 21 September 2017 — Rodonita v Commission and SRB
IO C 392, 20.11.2017, pp. 36–37
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
20.11.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 392/36 |
Action brought on 21 September 2017 — Rodonita v Commission and SRB
(Case T-645/17)
(2017/C 392/45)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Rodonita, SL (Coruña, Spain) (represented by: B. Gutiérrez de la Roza Pérez, P. Rubio Escobar, R. Ruiz de la Torre Esporrín and B. Fernández García, lawyers)
Defendants: European Commission and Single Resolution Board
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the General Court should:
— |
Annul Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board taken at its executive session of 7 June 2017 adopting the resolution scheme regarding the institution Banco Popular Español, S.A.; |
— |
Annul Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 endorsing the resolution scheme for Banco Popular Español, S.A.; |
— |
Additionally, in accordance with Articles 133 and 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, order the defendants and the parties intervening in full or partial support of the form of order sought by them to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.