This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document L:2016:312:FULL
Official Journal of the European Union, L 312, 18 November 2016
Official Journal of the European Union, L 312, 18 November 2016
Official Journal of the European Union, L 312, 18 November 2016
ISSN 1977-0677 |
||
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 312 |
|
![]() |
||
English edition |
Legislation |
Volume 59 |
|
|
|
(1) Text with EEA relevance |
EN |
Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period. The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
II Non-legislative acts
REGULATIONS
18.11.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 312/1 |
COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2016/2015
of 17 November 2016
implementing Regulation (EC) No 808/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning Community statistics on the information society
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 808/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 concerning Community statistics on the information society (1), and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Regulation (EC) No 808/2004 establishes a common framework for the systematic production of European statistics on the information society. |
(2) |
Implementing measures are needed to determine the data to be supplied in order to prepare the statistics in Module 1: ‘Enterprises and the information society’ and Module 2: ‘Individuals, households and the information society’, and to set the deadlines for their transmission. |
(3) |
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the European Statistical System Committee, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
The data to be transmitted in order to produce European statistics on the information society, as referred to in Articles 3(2) and 4 of Regulation (EC) No 808/2004, shall be as specified in Module 1, ‘Enterprises and the information society’, of Annex I and Module 2, ‘Individuals, households and the information society’, of Annex II to this Regulation.
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 17 November 2016.
For the Commission
The President
Jean-Claude JUNCKER
ANNEX I
MODULE 1: Enterprises and the information society
A. SUBJECTS AND THEIR CHARACTERISTICS
(1) |
The subjects to be covered for the reference year 2017, drawn from the list in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 808/2004, shall be as follows:
|
(2) |
The following enterprise characteristics shall be collected:
|
(3) |
The following background information shall be collected from all enterprises, or obtained from alternative sources:
|
B. COVERAGE
The characteristics specified in headings A(2) and (3) shall be collected for the following categories of enterprises:
(1) |
Economic activity: enterprises classified by the following NACE Rev. 2 categories:
|
(2) |
Enterprise size: enterprises with 10 or more persons employed. Enterprises with less than 10 persons employed may be covered optionally; |
(3) |
Geographical scope: enterprises located in any part of the territory of the Member State. |
C. REFERENCE PERIODS
The reference period is 2016 for the characteristics referring to the previous calendar year. The reference period is 2017 for the other characteristics.
D. BREAKDOWN OF DATA
The following background characteristics shall be provided in respect of the subjects and their characteristics listed in heading (2) of Part A:
(1) |
Economic activity breakdown: according to the following NACE Rev. 2 aggregates: NACE Rev. 2 aggregation for possible calculation of national aggregates 10 + 11 + 12 + 13 + 14 + 15 + 16 + 17 + 18 19 + 20 + 21 + 22 + 23 24 + 25 26 + 27 + 28 + 29 + 30 + 31 + 32 + 33 35 + 36 + 37 + 38 + 39 41 + 42 + 43 45 + 46 + 47 47 49 + 50 + 51 + 52 + 53 55 58 + 59 + 60 + 61 + 62 + 63 68 69 + 70 + 71 + 72 + 73 + 74 77 + 78 + 79 + 80 + 81 + 82 26.1 + 26.2 + 26.3 + 26.4 + 26.8 + 46.5 + 58.2 + 61 + 62 + 63.1 + 95.1 NACE Rev. 2 aggregation for possible calculation of European aggregates 10 + 11 + 12 13 + 14 + 15 16 + 17 + 18 26 27 + 28 29 + 30 31 + 32 + 33 45 46 55 + 56 58 + 59 + 60 61 62 + 63 77 + 78 + 80 + 81 + 82 79 95.1 |
(2) |
size class breakdown: data shall be broken down according to the following size classes by number of persons employed: Size class 10 or more persons employed 10 to 49 persons employed 50 to 249 persons employed 250 or more persons employed Where covered, a breakdown of the data shall be provided in accordance with the following table: Size class 0 to 9 persons employed (optional) 2 to 9 persons employed (optional) 0 to 1 persons employed (optional) |
E. PERIODICITY
The data stipulated in this Annex shall be provided once for 2017.
F. DEADLINES FOR TRANSMISSION OF RESULTS
(1) |
The aggregate data referred to in Article 6 and Annex I (6) of Regulation (EC) No 808/2004, where necessary flagged for confidentiality or unreliability, shall be transmitted to Eurostat by 5 October 2017. By that date, the dataset shall be finalised, validated and accepted. |
(2) |
The metadata referred to in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 808/2004 shall be sent to Eurostat by 31 May 2017. |
(3) |
The quality report referred to in Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 808/2004 shall be sent to Eurostat by 5 November 2017. |
(4) |
The data and metadata shall be supplied to Eurostat, using the Single Entry Point services, in accordance with the exchange standard specified by Eurostat. The metadata and the quality report shall be provided in the standard metadata structure defined by Eurostat. |
ANNEX II
MODULE 2: Individuals, households and the information society
A. SUBJECTS AND THEIR CHARACTERISTICS
(1) |
The subjects to be covered for the reference year 2017, drawn from the list in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 808/2004, shall be as follows:
|
(2) |
The following characteristics shall be collected:
|
B. COVERAGE
(1) |
The statistical units for the characteristics listed in heading A(2) of this Annex that concern households are households with at least one member in the 16 to 74 age group. |
(2) |
The statistical units for the characteristics listed in heading A(2) of this Annex that concern individuals are individuals aged 16 to 74. |
(3) |
The geographical scope comprises households or individuals, or both, living in any part of the territory of the Member State concerned. |
C. REFERENCE PERIOD
The main reference period for collecting statistics is the first quarter of 2017.
D. SOCIOECONOMIC BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICS
(1) |
For the subjects and their characteristics, listed in heading A(2) of this Annex, which concern households, the following background characteristics are to be collected:
|
(2) |
For the subjects and their characteristics, listed in heading A(2) of this Annex, which relate to individuals, the following background characteristics are to be collected:
|
E. PERIODICITY
The data stipulated in this Annex shall be provided once for 2017.
F. DEADLINES FOR TRANSMISSION OF RESULTS
(1) |
The individual data records, not allowing direct identification of statistical units concerned referred to in Article 6 and Annex II (6) of Regulation (EC) No 808/2004 shall be transmitted to Eurostat by 5 October 2017. By that date, the dataset shall be finalised, validated and accepted. |
(2) |
The metadata referred to in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 808/2004 shall be sent to Eurostat by 31 May 2017. |
(3) |
The quality report referred to in Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 808/2004 shall be sent to Eurostat by 5 November 2017. |
(4) |
The data and metadata shall be supplied to Eurostat, using the Single Entry Point services, in accordance with the exchange standard specified by Eurostat. The metadata and the quality report shall be provided in the standard metadata structure defined by Eurostat. |
18.11.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 312/21 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/2016
of 17 November 2016
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the extension of the approval periods of the active substances acetamiprid, benzoic acid, flazasulfuron, mecoprop-P, mepanipyrim, mesosulfuron, propineb, propoxycarbazon, propyzamide, propiconazole, Pseudomonas chlororaphis Strain: MA 342, pyraclostrobin, quinoxyfen, thiacloprid, thiram, ziram, zoxamide
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC (1), and in particular the first paragraph of Article 17 thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Part A of the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (2) sets out the active substances deemed to have been approved under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009. |
(2) |
The approval periods of the active substances benzoic acid, flazasulfuron, mecoprop-P, mesosulfuron, propineb, propoxycarbazon, propyzamide, propiconazole, pyraclostrobin, and zoxamide were derogated from by Commission Regulation (EU) No 823/2012 (3). The approval of those substances will expire on 31 January 2017. |
(3) |
The approval periods of the active substances acetamiprid, mepanipyrim, Pseudomonas chlororaphis Strain: MA 342, quinoxyfen, thiacloprid, thiram and ziram were extended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1197/2012 (4). The approval of those substances will expire on 30 April 2017. |
(4) |
Applications for the renewal of the approval of those substances were submitted in accordance with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 (5). |
(5) |
Due to the fact that the assessment of the substances has been delayed for reasons beyond the control of the applicants, the approvals of those active substances are likely to expire before a decision has been taken on their renewal. It is therefore necessary to extend their approval periods. |
(6) |
In view of the aim of the first paragraph of Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, as regards cases where the Commission will adopt a Regulation providing that the approval of an active substance referred to in the Annex to this Regulation is not renewed because the approval criteria are not satisfied, the Commission will set the expiry date at the same date as before this Regulation or at the date of the entry into force of the Regulation providing that the approval of the active substance is not renewed, whichever date is later. As regards cases where the Commission will adopt a Regulation providing for the renewal of an active substance referred to in the Annex to this Regulation, the Commission will endeavour to set, as appropriate under the circumstances, the earliest possible application date. |
(7) |
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
(8) |
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Part A of the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 17 November 2016.
For the Commission
The President
Jean-Claude JUNCKER
(1) OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p. 1.
(2) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 of 25 May 2011 Implementing Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of approved active substances (OJ L 153, 11.6.2011, p. 1).
(3) Commission Regulation (EU) No 823/2012 of 14 September 2012 derogating from Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the expiry dates of the approval of the active substances 2,4-DB, benzoic acid, beta-cyfluthrin, carfentrazone ethyl, Coniothyrium minitans Strain CON/M/91-08 (DSM 9660), cyazofamid, cyfluthrin, deltamethrin, dimethenamid-P, ethofumesate, ethoxysulfuron, fenamidone, flazasulfuron, flufenacet, flurtamone, foramsulfuron, fosthiazate, imazamox, iodosulfuron, iprodione, isoxaflutole, linuron, maleic hydrazide, mecoprop, mecoprop-P, mesosulfuron, mesotrione, oxadiargyl, oxasulfuron, pendimethalin, picoxystrobin, propiconazole, propineb, propoxycarbazone, propyzamide, pyraclostrobin, silthiofam, trifloxystrobin, warfarin and zoxamide (OJ L 250, 15.9.2012, p. 13).
(4) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1197/2012 of 13 December 2012 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the extension of the approval periods of the active substances acetamiprid, alpha-cypermethrin, Ampelomyces quisqualis Strain: AQ 10, benalaxyl, bifenazate, bromoxynil, chlorpropham, desmedipham, etoxazole, Gliocladium catenulatum Strain: J1446, imazosulfuron, laminarin, mepanipyrim, methoxyfenozide, milbemectin, phenmedipham, Pseudomonas chlororaphis Strain: MA 342, quinoxyfen, S-metolachlor, tepraloxydim, thiacloprid, thiram and ziram (OJ L 342, 14.12.2012, p. 27).
(5) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 of 18 September 2012 setting out the provisions necessary for the implementation of the renewal procedure for active substances, as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (OJ L 252, 19.9.2012, p. 26).
ANNEX
Part A of the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 is amended as follows:
(1) |
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 54, Propineb, the date is replaced by ‘31 January 2018’; |
(2) |
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 55, Propyzamide, the date is replaced by ‘31 January 2018’; |
(3) |
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 57, Mecoprop-P, the date is replaced by ‘31 January 2018’; |
(4) |
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 58, Propiconazole, the date is replaced by ‘31 January 2018’; |
(5) |
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 73, Thiram, the date is replaced by ‘30 April 2018’; |
(6) |
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 74, Ziram, the date is replaced by ‘30 April 2018’; |
(7) |
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 75, Mesosulfuron, the date is replaced by ‘31 January 2018’; |
(8) |
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 76, Propoxycarbazone, the date is replaced by ‘31 January 2018’; |
(9) |
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 77, Zoxamide, the date is replaced by ‘31 January 2018’; |
(10) |
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 79, Benzoic acid, the date is replaced by ‘31 January 2018’; |
(11) |
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 80, Flazasulfuron, the date is replaced by ‘31 January 2018’; |
(12) |
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 81, Pyraclostrobin, the date is replaced by ‘31 January 2018’; |
(13) |
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 82, Quinoxyfen, the date is replaced by ‘30 April 2018’; |
(14) |
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 89, Pseudomonas chlororaphis Strain: MA 342, the date is replaced by ‘30 April 2018’; |
(15) |
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 90, Mepanipyrim, the date is replaced by ‘30 April 2018’; |
(16) |
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 91, Acetamiprid, the date is replaced by ‘30 April 2018’; |
(17) |
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 92, Thiacloprid, the date is replaced by ‘30 April 2018’. |
18.11.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 312/24 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/2017
of 17 November 2016
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1),
Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors (2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto. |
(2) |
The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to this Regulation.
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 17 November 2016.
For the Commission,
On behalf of the President,
Jerzy PLEWA
Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development
ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
(EUR/100 kg) |
||
CN code |
Third country code (1) |
Standard import value |
0702 00 00 |
MA |
78,2 |
TR |
76,6 |
|
ZZ |
77,4 |
|
0707 00 05 |
TR |
142,8 |
ZZ |
142,8 |
|
0709 93 10 |
MA |
97,3 |
TR |
138,0 |
|
ZZ |
117,7 |
|
0805 20 10 |
MA |
74,6 |
ZZ |
74,6 |
|
0805 20 30 , 0805 20 50 , 0805 20 70 , 0805 20 90 |
JM |
98,8 |
PE |
116,9 |
|
TR |
67,6 |
|
ZZ |
94,4 |
|
0805 50 10 |
TR |
90,4 |
ZZ |
90,4 |
|
0806 10 10 |
BR |
283,0 |
IN |
166,9 |
|
LB |
214,0 |
|
PE |
270,2 |
|
TR |
147,4 |
|
US |
365,4 |
|
ZZ |
241,2 |
|
0808 10 80 |
CL |
162,6 |
NZ |
153,2 |
|
ZA |
127,6 |
|
ZZ |
147,8 |
|
0808 30 90 |
CN |
92,4 |
TR |
168,6 |
|
ZZ |
130,5 |
(1) Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1106/2012 of 27 November 2012 implementing Regulation (EC) No 471/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community statistics relating to external trade with non-member countries, as regards the update of the nomenclature of countries and territories (OJ L 328, 28.11.2012, p. 7). Code ‘ZZ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
DECISIONS
18.11.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 312/26 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2016/2018
of 15 November 2016
excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
(notified under document C(2016) 7232)
(Only the Bulgarian, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Maltese, Latvian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish, Swedish texts are authentic)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008 (1), and in particular Article 52 thereof,
After consulting the Committee on the Agricultural Funds,
Whereas:
(1) |
In accordance with Article 31 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 (2) and as from 1 January 2015 in accordance with Article 52 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 the Commission is to carry out the necessary verifications, communicate to the Member States the results of those verifications, take note of the comments of the Member States, initiate a bilateral discussion so that an agreement may be reached with the Member States in question, and formally communicate its conclusions to them. |
(2) |
The Member States have had an opportunity to request the launch of a conciliation procedure. That opportunity has been used in some cases and the reports issued on the outcome have been examined by the Commission. |
(3) |
In accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013, only agricultural expenditure which has been incurred in a way that has not infringed Union law may be financed. |
(4) |
In the light of the verifications carried out, the outcome of the bilateral discussions and the conciliation procedures, part of the expenditure declared by the Member States does not fulfil this requirement and cannot, therefore, be financed under the EAGF and the EAFRD. |
(5) |
The amounts that are not recognised as being chargeable to the EAGF and the EAFRD should be indicated. Those amounts do not relate to expenditure incurred more than 24 months before the Commission's written notification of the results of the verifications to the Member States. |
(6) |
As regards the cases covered by this decision, the assessment of the amounts to be excluded on grounds of non-compliance with Union law was notified by the Commission to the Member States in a summary report on the subject (3). |
(7) |
This Decision is without prejudice to any financial conclusions that the Commission may draw from the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union in cases pending on 1 September 2016, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
The amounts set out in the Annex and related to expenditure incurred by the Member States' accredited paying agencies and declared under the EAGF or the EAFRD shall be excluded from Union financing.
Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Latvia, Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, Romania, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Done at Brussels, 15 November 2016.
For the Commission
Phil HOGAN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 549.
(2) Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (OJ L 209, 11.8.2005, p. 1).
(3) Ares(2016)6109155, 25.10.2016.
ANNEX
Decision: 52
Budget Item:
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
LV |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
Reimbursement following judgment in case T-661/14 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
212 566,45 |
0,00 |
212 566,45 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
Reimbursement following judgment in case T-661/14 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
92 731,87 |
0,00 |
92 731,87 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
Reimbursement following judgment in case T-661/14 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 1 146,35 |
0,00 |
– 1 146,35 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2011 |
Reimbursement following judgment in case T-661/14 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 249,48 |
0,00 |
– 249,48 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2011 |
Reimbursement following judgment in case T-661/14 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 425,78 |
0,00 |
– 425,78 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2012 |
Reimbursement following judgment in case T-661/14 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 106,22 |
0,00 |
– 106,22 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2012 |
Reimbursement following judgment in case T-661/14 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 183,03 |
0,00 |
– 183,03 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total LV: |
EUR |
303 187,46 |
0,00 |
303 187,46 |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
EUR |
303 187,46 |
0,00 |
303 187,46 |
Budget Item:
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
GR |
Entitlements |
2008 |
Reimbursement following judgment in case T-107/14 |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
9 935 755,68 |
4 967 877,84 |
4 967 877,84 |
|
Entitlements |
2009 |
Reimbursement following judgment in case T-107/14 |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
9 739 243,02 |
0,00 |
9 739 243,02 |
|
Entitlements |
2010 |
Reimbursement following judgment in case T-107/14 |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
9 691 976,36 |
0,00 |
9 691 976,36 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total GR: |
EUR |
29 366 975,06 |
4 967 877,84 |
24 399 097,22 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
LV |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
Reimbursement following judgment in case T-661/14 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
254 163,51 |
0,00 |
254 163,51 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
Reimbursement following judgment in case T-661/14 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
181 777,79 |
0,00 |
181 777,79 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
Reimbursement following judgment in case T-661/14 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
179,81 |
0,00 |
179,81 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2011 |
Reimbursement following judgment in case T-661/14 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
100,05 |
0,00 |
100,05 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2011 |
Reimbursement following judgment in case T-661/14 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 14,86 |
0,00 |
– 14,86 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2012 |
Reimbursement following judgment in case T-661/14 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
0,19 |
0,00 |
0,19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total LV: |
EUR |
436 206,49 |
0,00 |
436 206,49 |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
EUR |
29 803 181,55 |
4 967 877,84 |
24 835 303,71 |
Budget Item:
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
AT |
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes |
2012 |
Assets located outside the POs premises or holdings |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 1 909 582,50 |
0,00 |
– 1 909 582,50 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes |
2013 |
Assets located outside the POs premises or holdings |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 1 864 938,19 |
0,00 |
– 1 864 938,19 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes |
2012 |
Ineligible staff costs |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 39 738,41 |
0,00 |
– 39 738,41 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes |
2013 |
Ineligible staff costs |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 41 174,87 |
0,00 |
– 41 174,87 |
|
Irregularities |
2012 |
Non-accrued/reported interest and delays in the recovery procedure |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 24 231,03 |
0,00 |
– 24 231,03 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes |
2012 |
Unduly recognised POs |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 498 721,65 |
0,00 |
– 498 721,65 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes |
2013 |
Unduly recognised POs |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 899 392,44 |
0,00 |
– 899 392,44 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals |
2014 |
Unduly recognised POs |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 915 136,70 |
0,00 |
– 915 136,70 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes |
2012 |
Weaknesses in key control FY2012-3 |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 559 871,49 |
– 244 804,26 |
– 315 067,23 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes |
2013 |
Weaknesses in key control FY2012-3 |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 776 598,77 |
– 280 550,55 |
– 496 048,22 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals |
2014 |
Weakness in key controls FY 2014 only |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 882 206,97 |
0,00 |
– 882 206,97 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total AT: |
EUR |
– 8 411 593,02 |
– 525 354,81 |
– 7 886 238,21 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
BE |
Cross Compliance |
2013 |
Application of tolerances and leniency of the sanctioning system — CY 2012 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 43 418,70 |
– 86,84 |
– 43 331,86 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2014 |
Application of tolerances and leniency of the sanctioning system — CY 2013 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 87 826,17 |
– 175,65 |
– 87 650,52 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2015 |
Application of tolerances and leniency of the sanctioning system — CY 2014 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 37 343,34 |
– 74,68 |
– 37 268,66 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2013 |
Limited scope of checks of SMRs 1, 2, 4 and 5 — No follow-up of minor non-compliances — Deficient risk analysis for checks by veterinary services — CY 2012 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 598 444,65 |
– 256,81 |
– 598 187,84 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2014 |
Limited scope of checks of SMRs 1, 2, 4 and 5 — No follow-up of minor non-compliances — Deficient risk analysis for checks by veterinary services — CY 2012 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 193,80 |
0,00 |
– 193,80 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2014 |
Limited scope of checks of SMRs 1, 2, 4 and 5 — No follow-up of minor non-compliances — Deficient risk analysis for checks by veterinary services — CY 2013 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 582 487,99 |
0,00 |
– 582 487,99 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2015 |
Limited scope of checks of SMRs 1, 2, 4 and 5 — No follow-up of minor non-compliances — Deficient risk analysis for checks by veterinary services — CY 2014 |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 569 653,02 |
0,00 |
– 569 653,02 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total BE: |
EUR |
– 1 919 367,67 |
– 593,98 |
– 1 918 773,69 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
DE |
Certification |
2014 |
Financial errors identified by the Certification Body |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 6 121,69 |
0,00 |
– 6 121,69 |
|
Certification |
2014 |
Financial errors identified by the Certification Body |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 2 397,36 |
0,00 |
– 2 397,36 |
|
Decoupled Direct Aids |
2015 |
Weakness in the LPIS-GIS — Performance of crosschecks to establish eligibility of the parcel declared (key control) |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 65 880,00 |
0,00 |
– 65 880,00 |
|
Decoupled Direct Aids |
2016 |
Weakness in the LPIS-GIS — Performance of crosschecks to establish eligibility of the parcel declared (key control) |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 72 630,00 |
0,00 |
– 72 630,00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total DE: |
EUR |
– 147 029,05 |
0,00 |
– 147 029,05 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
DK |
Certification |
2015 |
Errors detected in the re-performance of OTSC in the EAGF IACS population |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 3 163,98 |
0,00 |
– 3 163,98 |
|
Certification |
2012 |
Lack of appropriate reaction by DAFA in relation to the company evading the controls |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 182 151,60 |
0,00 |
– 182 151,60 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total DK: |
EUR |
– 185 315,58 |
0,00 |
– 185 315,58 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
ES |
Recoveries |
2008 |
Amounts not traced back in the authorities' declaration of payments |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 57 499,79 |
0,00 |
– 57 499,79 |
|
Recoveries |
2009 |
Amounts not traced back in the authorities' declaration of payments |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 57 499,79 |
0,00 |
– 57 499,79 |
|
Recoveries |
2010 |
Amounts not traced back in the authorities' declaration of payments |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 452 132,84 |
0,00 |
– 452 132,84 |
|
Recoveries |
2011 |
Amounts not traced back in the authorities' declaration of payments |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
8 118,38 |
0,00 |
8 118,38 |
|
Recoveries |
2012 |
Amounts not traced back in the authorities' declaration of payments |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
0,01 |
0,00 |
0,01 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2012 |
Deficiencies in the effectiveness of OTSC, partial coverage of 7 SMRs, incorrect treatment of late notification and of missing ear tags (SMR7 and 8), CY 2011 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 4 552 942,45 |
– 821,75 |
– 4 552 120,70 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2013 |
Deficiencies in the effectiveness of OTSC, partial coverage of 7 SMRs, incorrect treatment of late notification and of missing ear tags (SMR7 and 8), CY 2011 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 1 537,30 |
0,00 |
– 1 537,30 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2011 |
Deficiencies in the effectiveness of OTSC, partial coverage of 7 SMRs, incorrect treatment of late notification and of missing ear tags (SMR7 and 8), CY 2012 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 3 172,88 |
– 0,06 |
– 3 172,82 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2013 |
Deficiencies in the effectiveness of OTSC, partial coverage of 7 SMRs, incorrect treatment of late notification and of missing ear tags (SMR7 and 8), CY 2012 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 4 507 539,72 |
– 84 158,35 |
– 4 423 381,37 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes |
2008 |
Environmental Management of Packaging (EMP) |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 10 582,61 |
– 10 396,61 |
– 186,00 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes |
2009 |
Environmental Management of Packaging (EMP) |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 850 590,17 |
– 813 343,56 |
– 37 246,61 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes |
2010 |
Environmental Management of Packaging (EMP) |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 9 872,42 |
– 8 618,07 |
– 1 254,35 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes |
2011 |
Environmental Management of Packaging (EMP) |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 2 382,39 |
– 2 266,08 |
– 116,31 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes |
2012 |
Environmental Management of Packaging (EMP) |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 343,30 |
0,00 |
– 343,30 |
|
Certification |
2014 |
Extrapolated error for EAGF non-IACS population |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 830,81 |
0,00 |
– 830,81 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2014 |
Incorrect treatment of late notification and of missing ear tags (SMR7 and 8), CY 2013 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 688 407,59 |
– 30 146,05 |
– 658 261,54 |
|
Certification |
2014 |
Known error identified in the EAGF IACS population. SPS |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 353 214,35 |
– 1 807,35 |
– 351 407,00 |
|
Certification |
2012 |
Non-eligible sugar restructuring aid |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 1 361 413,12 |
– 5 268,22 |
– 1 356 144,90 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals |
2009 |
Undue aid payments for leasing arrangements |
ONE OFF |
0,00 % |
EUR |
– 13 336,00 |
– 3 289,74 |
– 10 046,26 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes |
2009 |
Weaknesses in eligibility of expenditure |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 29 641,68 |
– 1 870,43 |
– 27 771,25 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes |
2011 |
Weaknesses in eligibility of expenditure |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 92 471,27 |
– 558,53 |
– 91 912,74 |
|
_Recoveries |
2008 |
Weaknesses in managing irregularities |
ONE OFF |
0,00 % |
EUR |
– 90 579,48 |
0,00 |
– 90 579,48 |
|
_Recoveries |
2009 |
Weaknesses in managing irregularities |
ONE OFF |
0,00 % |
EUR |
– 91 063,44 |
0,00 |
– 91 063,44 |
|
_Recoveries |
2010 |
Weaknesses in managing irregularities |
ONE OFF |
0,00 % |
EUR |
– 412 867,62 |
0,00 |
– 412 867,62 |
|
_Recoveries |
2011 |
Weaknesses in managing irregularities |
ONE OFF |
0,00 % |
EUR |
– 59 631,00 |
0,00 |
– 59 631,00 |
|
_Recoveries |
2012 |
Weaknesses in managing irregularities |
ONE OFF |
0,00 % |
EUR |
– 16 835,39 |
0,00 |
– 16 835,39 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals |
2009 |
Weaknesses in the control system for the recognition of producer organisations |
ONE OFF |
0,00 % |
EUR |
– 280 031,76 |
– 1 691,39 |
– 278 340,37 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals |
2009 |
Weaknesses in programme approval/authorisation of expenditure and Weaknesses in establishing standard flat rates for environmental actions. OP 2008 & 2009 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 57 063,20 |
– 29 708,57 |
– 27 354,63 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals |
2010 |
Weaknesses in programme approval/authorisation of expenditure and Weaknesses in establishing standard flat rates for environmental actions. OP 2008 & 2009 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 300 020,04 |
– 273 601,71 |
– 26 418,33 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes |
2011 |
Weaknesses in programme approval/authorisation of expenditure and Weaknesses in establishing standard flat rates for environmental actions. OP 2010, 2011 & 2012 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 205 226,38 |
– 205 226,38 |
0,00 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes |
2012 |
Weaknesses in programme approval/authorisation of expenditure and Weaknesses in establishing standard flat rates for environmental actions. OP 2010, 2011 & 2012 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 193 521,83 |
0,00 |
– 193 521,83 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes |
2013 |
Weaknesses in programme approval/authorisation of expenditure and Weaknesses in establishing standard flat rates for environmental actions. OP 2010, 2011 & 2012 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 245 200,53 |
0,00 |
– 245 200,53 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals |
2014 |
Weaknesses in programme approval/authorisation of expenditure and Weaknesses in establishing standard flat rates for environmental actions. OP 2013 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 323 602,75 |
0,00 |
– 323 602,75 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals |
2009 |
Weaknesses in programme approval/authorisation of expenditure and weaknesses in establishing standard flat rates for environmental actions |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 652 299,20 |
– 180 687,65 |
– 471 611,55 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals |
2010 |
Weaknesses in programme approval/authorisation of expenditure and weaknesses in establishing standard flat rates for environmental actions |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 718 821,45 |
– 88 990,15 |
– 629 831,30 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals |
2011 |
Weaknesses in programme approval/authorisation of expenditure and weaknesses in establishing standard flat rates for environmental actions |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 771 482,90 |
– 93 881,68 |
– 677 601,22 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals |
2012 |
Weaknesses in programme approval/authorisation of expenditure and weaknesses in establishing standard flat rates for environmental actions |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 14 516,85 |
0,00 |
– 14 516,85 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals |
2008 |
Weaknesses in the management of the risk of double funding |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 668 667,53 |
– 588 156,44 |
– 80 511,09 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals |
2009 |
Weaknesses in the management of the risk of double funding |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 680 158,12 |
– 237 238,19 |
– 442 919,93 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals |
2010 |
Weaknesses in the management of the risk of double funding |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 736 610,85 |
– 91 366,47 |
– 645 244,38 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals |
2011 |
Weaknesses in the management of the risk of double funding |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 718 697,92 |
– 127 039,32 |
– 591 658,60 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals |
2012 |
Weaknesses in the management of the risk of double funding |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 706 338,24 |
– 26 251,74 |
– 680 086,50 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals |
2013 |
Weaknesses in the management of the risk of double funding |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 599 782,11 |
– 23 254,76 |
– 576 527,35 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total ES: |
EUR |
– 21 580 310,68 |
– 2 929 639,25 |
– 18 650 671,43 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
FR |
Irregularities |
2010 |
Case n°DAJ2/DPO8492 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 26 750 942,00 |
0,00 |
– 26 750 942,00 |
|
Irregularities |
2010 |
Case n°GXHP200700062 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 2 920,03 |
0,00 |
– 2 920,03 |
|
Irregularities |
2010 |
Case n° LAIT 02836/TR410759 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 144 027,14 |
0,00 |
– 144 027,14 |
|
Irregularities |
2010 |
Case n°OINP201180010 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 38 302,46 |
0,00 |
– 38 302,46 |
|
Irregularities |
2010 |
Case n°TR2001008 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 50 253,13 |
0,00 |
– 50 253,13 |
|
Irregularities |
2010 |
Case n°TR451024 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 2 960 918,36 |
0,00 |
– 2 960 918,36 |
|
Irregularities |
2010 |
Cases escaping the application of the 50/50 rule due to their late evaluation |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 9 569,59 |
0,00 |
– 9 569,59 |
|
Irregularities |
2010 |
Cases not reported in the Annex III table or reported with an improper PACA escaping the application of the 50/50 rule |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 7 884,99 |
0,00 |
– 7 884,99 |
|
Irregularities |
2010 |
interests not reported in the Annex III table, escaping the application of the 50/50 rule |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 4 171 977,50 |
0,00 |
– 4 171 977,50 |
|
Irregularities |
2015 |
Non respect of diligence pursuing to article 32(5) R. 1290/2005 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 1 402 884,37 |
0,00 |
– 1 402 884,37 |
|
Irregularities |
2010 |
pre-debts not converted into debts within 1 year after the PACA |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 10 853 421,42 |
0,00 |
– 10 853 421,42 |
|
Irregularities |
2010 |
Unvalued debts, escaping the application of the 50/50 rule |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 6 653,47 |
0,00 |
– 6 653,47 |
|
Promotion Measures |
2010 |
weakness in the control of the selection of the implementing body (competitive procedure not adequate) |
FLAT RATE |
25,00 % |
EUR |
– 205 820,79 |
0,00 |
– 205 820,79 |
|
Promotion Measures |
2011 |
weakness in the control of the selection of the implementing body (competitive procedure not adequate) |
FLAT RATE |
25,00 % |
EUR |
– 239 784,46 |
0,00 |
– 239 784,46 |
|
Promotion Measures |
2012 |
weakness in the control of the selection of the implementing body (competitive procedure not adequate) |
FLAT RATE |
25,00 % |
EUR |
– 219 122,42 |
0,00 |
– 219 122,42 |
|
Promotion Measures |
2013 |
weakness in the control of the selection of the implementing body (competitive procedure not adequate) |
FLAT RATE |
25,00 % |
EUR |
– 40 407,41 |
0,00 |
– 40 407,41 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total FR: |
EUR |
– 47 104 889,54 |
0,00 |
– 47 104 889,54 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
GB |
Certification |
2012 |
Adjustments regarding the reimbursements to the Paying Agency |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 10 766,00 |
– 236,42 |
– 10 529,58 |
|
Decoupled Direct Aids |
2014 |
Lack of retroactive recoveries claim years 2013 and 2014, Art.80 of R.1122/2009 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 819 832,00 |
0,00 |
– 819 832,00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total GB: |
EUR |
– 830 598,00 |
– 236,42 |
– 830 361,58 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
HU |
Cross Compliance |
2013 |
Application of tolerance for animal identification, no evaluation of minor non-compliances, leniency in the sanctioning system, grace period for replacing ear tags, CY2012 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 345 104,16 |
0,00 |
– 345 104,16 |
|
Wine — Investment |
2013 |
Deficiency of control on the eligibility criteria of the investment |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 141 511,53 |
0,00 |
– 141 511,53 |
|
Wine — Investment |
2014 |
Deficiency of control on the eligibility criteria of the investment |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 132 732,62 |
0,00 |
– 132 732,62 |
|
Wine — Investment |
2015 |
Deficiency of control on the eligibility criteria of the investment |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 65 771,82 |
0,00 |
– 65 771,82 |
|
Decoupled Direct Aids |
2012 |
lack of retroactive procedure 2008 — 2013 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 27 454 967,41 |
0,00 |
– 27 454 967,41 |
|
Decoupled Direct Aids |
2013 |
lack of retroactive procedure 2008 — 2013 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 1 205 419,21 |
0,00 |
– 1 205 419,21 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2014 |
No evaluation of minor non-compliances, leniency in the sanctioning system, grace period for replacing ear tags, CY2013 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 85 272,17 |
0,00 |
– 85 272,17 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2015 |
No evaluation of minor non-compliances, leniency in the sanctioning system, grace period for replacing ear tags, CY2014 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 47 840,41 |
0,00 |
– 47 840,41 |
|
Decoupled Direct Aids |
2012 |
Parcel identification for claim years 2011 and 2012 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 7 473,33 |
0,00 |
– 7 473,33 |
|
Decoupled Direct Aids |
2013 |
Parcel identification for claim years 2011 and 2012 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 7 473,32 |
0,00 |
– 7 473,32 |
|
Decoupled Direct Aids |
2012 |
Deficiencies in risk analysis, claim years 2011, 2012 and 2013 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 7 038 944,95 |
0,00 |
– 7 038 944,95 |
|
Decoupled Direct Aids |
2013 |
Deficiencies in risk analysis, claim years 2011, 2012 and 2013 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 3 371 318,84 |
0,00 |
– 3 371 318,84 |
|
Decoupled Direct Aids |
2014 |
Deficiencies in risk analysis, claim years 2011, 2012 and 2013 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 1 348 980,52 |
0,00 |
– 1 348 980,52 |
|
Decoupled Direct Aids |
2013 |
Deficiencies in risk analysis, claim years 2012 and 2013 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 7 038 944,95 |
0,00 |
– 7 038 944,95 |
|
Decoupled Direct Aids |
2014 |
Deficiencies in risk analysis, claim years 2012 and 2013 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 10 410 263,79 |
0,00 |
– 10 410 263,79 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total HU: |
EUR |
– 58 702 019,03 |
0,00 |
– 58 702 019,03 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
IT |
Certification |
2013 |
20 % recovery costs discounted too late |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 65 518,44 |
0,00 |
– 65 518,44 |
|
School Fruit Scheme |
2012 |
Absence of checks in communication costs |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 54 596,43 |
0,00 |
– 54 596,43 |
|
School Fruit Scheme |
2013 |
Absence of checks in communication costs |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 43 039,98 |
0,00 |
– 43 039,98 |
|
School Fruit Scheme |
2014 |
Absence of checks in communication costs |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 56 718,12 |
0,00 |
– 56 718,12 |
|
Wine — Restructuring |
2012 |
Failure to apply properly the control established by Article 79 of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 851,44 |
0,00 |
– 851,44 |
|
Wine — Restructuring |
2013 |
Failure to apply properly the control established by Article 79 of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 354 700,47 |
0,00 |
– 354 700,47 |
|
Wine — Restructuring |
2014 |
Failure to apply properly the control established by Article 79 of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 360 360,05 |
0,00 |
– 360 360,05 |
|
Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 |
2012 |
Incorrect application of reductions |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 6 558,38 |
0,00 |
– 6 558,38 |
|
Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 |
2013 |
Incorrect calculation of reductions |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 334,77 |
0,00 |
– 334,77 |
|
School Fruit Scheme |
2012 |
Non compliance with public procurement provisions |
FLAT RATE |
25,00 % |
EUR |
– 4 170 834,38 |
0,00 |
– 4 170 834,38 |
|
School Fruit Scheme |
2013 |
Non compliance with public procurement provisions |
FLAT RATE |
25,00 % |
EUR |
– 4 779 213,02 |
0,00 |
– 4 779 213,02 |
|
Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 |
2012 |
Payment of ineligible animals |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 935,59 |
0,00 |
– 935,59 |
|
Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 |
2013 |
Payment of ineligible animals |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 1 139,51 |
0,00 |
– 1 139,51 |
|
Certification |
2013 |
problem to respect aids payment within five working days |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 37 986,20 |
0,00 |
– 37 986,20 |
|
Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 |
2012 |
Rate of on-the-spot checks and size of the sample for on-the-spot checks not respected |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 2 035 878,67 |
– 6 474,85 |
– 2 029 403,82 |
|
Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 |
2013 |
Rate of on-the-spot checks and size of the sample for on-the-spot checks not respected |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 366 823,40 |
– 29,48 |
– 366 793,92 |
|
Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 |
2014 |
Rate of on-the-spot checks and size of the sample for on-the-spot checks not respected |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 360 765,32 |
0,00 |
– 360 765,32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total IT: |
EUR |
– 12 696 254,17 |
– 6 504,33 |
– 12 689 749,84 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
NL |
Irregularities |
2010 |
No recovery action taken by Dutch authorities as regarding irregularity detected in an OLAF investigation in 2000. |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 424 837,90 |
0,00 |
– 424 837,90 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total NL: |
EUR |
– 424 837,90 |
0,00 |
– 424 837,90 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
PL |
Certification |
2013 |
Cases for which the PA decided not to pursue a recovery |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 11 155,11 |
0,00 |
– 11 155,11 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Pre-recognised Producer Groups |
2012 |
Weaknesses in key controls, especially as regards checks on recognition plans and on recognition criteria |
FLAT RATE |
25,00 % |
EUR |
– 64 974 750,82 |
– 25 989 900,32 |
– 38 984 850,50 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Pre-recognised Producer Groups |
2013 |
Weaknesses in key controls, especially as regards checks on recognition plans and on recognition criteria |
FLAT RATE |
25,00 % |
EUR |
– 76 816 098,12 |
0,00 |
– 76 816 098,12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total PL: |
EUR |
– 141 802 004,05 |
– 25 989 900,32 |
– 115 812 103,73 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
PT |
Other Direct Aid — POSEI |
2012 |
Normal inspection activity was funded from the technical assistance heading of the POSEI sub-programme for the Azores |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 460 202,73 |
0,00 |
– 460 202,73 |
|
Other Direct Aid — POSEI |
2013 |
Normal inspection activity was funded from the technical assistance heading of the POSEI sub-programme for the Azores |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 200 000,00 |
0,00 |
– 200 000,00 |
|
Food Aid within the Community |
2010 |
weakness of a key control for ‘follow up of controls’ (stock accounting) from 1.9.2010 to the end of ‘most deprived’ programme 2010 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 390 318,22 |
0,00 |
– 390 318,22 |
|
Food Aid within the Community |
2011 |
weakness of a key control for ‘follow up of controls’ (stock accounting) from 1.9.2010 to the end of ‘most deprived’ programme 2010 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 374 320,14 |
0,00 |
– 374 320,14 |
|
Food Aid within the Community |
2012 |
weakness of a key control for ‘follow up of controls’ (stock accounting) from 1.9.2010 to the end of ‘most deprived’ programme 2010 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 381 406,97 |
0,00 |
– 381 406,97 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total PT: |
EUR |
– 1 806 248,06 |
0,00 |
– 1 806 248,06 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
RO |
Cross Compliance |
2011 |
Absence of risk analysis for animal identification SMRs, SMR1 and 5 not checked for all farmers, no specific criteria for the selection of the parcel during OTSC, CY2012 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 21 404,36 |
– 25,22 |
– 21 379,14 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2012 |
Absence of risk analysis for animal identification SMRs, SMR1 and 5 not checked for all farmers, no specific criteria for the selection of the parcel during OTSC, CY2012 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 14 469,30 |
– 19,41 |
– 14 449,89 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2013 |
Absence of risk analysis for animal identification SMRs, SMR1 and 5 not checked for all farmers, no specific criteria for the selection of the parcel during OTSC, CY2012 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 651 591,27 |
– 874,73 |
– 650 716,54 |
|
Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 |
2013 |
Animals not in the herd register |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 1 121,04 |
0,00 |
– 1 121,04 |
|
Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 |
2014 |
Animals not in the herd register |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 285,82 |
0,00 |
– 285,82 |
|
Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 |
2013 |
Deficient on-the-spot checks |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 43 624,29 |
0,00 |
– 43 624,29 |
|
Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 |
2014 |
Deficient on-the-spot checks |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 135 630,95 |
0,00 |
– 135 630,95 |
|
Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 |
2015 |
Deficient on-the-spot checks |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 237 720,00 |
0,00 |
– 237 720,00 |
|
Certification |
2010 |
error in the debt management system FY2010 EAGF |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 2 776,25 |
0,00 |
– 2 776,25 |
|
Certification |
2011 |
error in the debt management system FY2011 EAGF |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 1 261,10 |
0,00 |
– 1 261,10 |
|
Scrutiny of transactions |
2010 |
Weaknesses in administrative framework and insufficient quality of scrutiny FY 2010 |
FLAT RATE |
0,50 % |
EUR |
– 49 843,71 |
0,00 |
– 49 843,71 |
|
Scrutiny of transactions |
2011 |
Weaknesses in administrative framework and insufficient quality of scrutiny FY 2011 |
FLAT RATE |
0,50 % |
EUR |
– 239 834,11 |
0,00 |
– 239 834,11 |
|
Scrutiny of transactions |
2012 |
Weaknesses in administrative framework and insufficient quality of scrutiny FY 2012 |
FLAT RATE |
0,50 % |
EUR |
– 55 896,10 |
0,00 |
– 55 896,10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total RO: |
EUR |
– 1 455 458,30 |
– 919,36 |
– 1 454 538,94 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
SE |
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes |
2010 |
unduly recognition |
ONE OFF |
0,00 % |
EUR |
– 451 853,95 |
0,00 |
– 451 853,95 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes |
2011 |
unduly recognition |
ONE OFF |
0,00 % |
EUR |
– 349 305,95 |
0,00 |
– 349 305,95 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes |
2010 |
weaknesses in key controls |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 27 794,70 |
– 7 638,10 |
– 20 156,60 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes |
2010 |
weaknesses in key controls |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 383 072,07 |
– 29 585,26 |
– 353 486,81 |
|
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes |
2011 |
weaknesses in key controls |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 117 435,73 |
– 17 465,30 |
– 99 970,43 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total SE: |
EUR |
– 1 329 462,40 |
– 54 688,66 |
– 1 274 773,74 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
SI |
Cross Compliance |
2013 |
Weaknesses in the OTSC's of SMR 1, SMR 16, SMR 17, SMR 18 and the evaluation grid. CY 2012 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 1 590,84 |
0,00 |
– 1 590,84 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2014 |
Weaknesses in the OTSC's of SMR 1, SMR 16, SMR 17, SMR 18 and the evaluation grid. CY 2012 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 19,96 |
0,00 |
– 19,96 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2014 |
Weaknesses in the OTSC's of SMR 1, SMR 16, SMR 17, SMR 18 and the evaluation grid. CY 2013 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 280 043,67 |
0,00 |
– 280 043,67 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2013 |
Weaknesses in the OTSC's of SMR 1, SMR 16, SMR 17, SMR 18 and the evaluation grid. CY 2014 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 8 439,51 |
0,00 |
– 8 439,51 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2015 |
Weaknesses in the OTSC's of SMR 1, SMR 16, SMR 17, SMR 18 and the evaluation grid. CY 2014 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 271 939,48 |
– 68,42 |
– 271 871,06 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total SI: |
EUR |
– 562 033,46 |
– 68,42 |
– 561 965,04 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
SK |
Cross Compliance |
2012 |
One GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2011 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 1 591 159,40 |
– 8 695,79 |
– 1 582 463,61 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2013 |
One GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2011 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 2 181,65 |
– 11,91 |
– 2 169,74 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2014 |
One GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2011 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 734,05 |
0,00 |
– 734,05 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2011 |
One GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2012 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 2 995,21 |
0,00 |
– 2 995,21 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2012 |
One GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2012 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 534,75 |
0,00 |
– 534,75 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2013 |
One GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2012 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 1 764 473,62 |
0,00 |
– 1 764 473,62 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2014 |
One GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2012 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 798,08 |
0,00 |
– 798,08 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2012 |
One GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2013 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 965,25 |
0,00 |
– 965,25 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2013 |
One GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2013 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 985,39 |
0,00 |
– 985,39 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2014 |
One GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2013 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 740 795,43 |
0,00 |
– 740 795,43 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total SK: |
EUR |
– 4 105 622,83 |
– 8 707,70 |
– 4 096 915,13 |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
EUR |
– 303 063 043,74 |
– 29 516 613,25 |
– 273 546 430,49 |
Budget Item:
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
BE |
Certification |
2014 |
Known error for EAFRD IACS population |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 24 230,01 |
– 48,86 |
– 24 181,15 |
|
Certification |
2014 |
MLE for the EAFRD non-IACS population |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 123 429,41 |
0,00 |
– 123 429,41 |
|
Certification |
2014 |
MLE for the EAFRD IACS population |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 110 788,10 |
– 223,42 |
– 110 564,68 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2013 |
Limited scope of checks of SMRs 1, 2, 4 and 5 — No follow-up of minor non-compliances — Deficient risk analysis for checks by veterinary services — CY 2012 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 19 570,41 |
0,00 |
– 19 570,41 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2014 |
Limited scope of checks of SMRs 1, 2, 4 and 5 — No follow-up of minor non-compliances — Deficient risk analysis for checks by veterinary services — CY 2012 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
280,00 |
0,00 |
280,00 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2013 |
Limited scope of checks of SMRs 1, 2, 4 and 5 — No follow-up of minor non-compliances — Deficient risk analysis for checks by veterinary services — CY 2013 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
1,07 |
0,00 |
1,07 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2014 |
Limited scope of checks of SMRs 1, 2, 4 and 5 — No follow-up of minor non-compliances — Deficient risk analysis for checks by veterinary services — CY 2013 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 16 006,55 |
0,00 |
– 16 006,55 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total BE: |
EUR |
– 293 743,41 |
– 272,28 |
– 293 471,13 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
BG |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support |
2015 |
Lack of checks on requirement for semi-subsistence holdings to market part of their output |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 187 091,42 |
0,00 |
– 187 091,42 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) |
2013 |
Lack of checks on requirement for semi-subsistence holdings to market part of their output |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 365 906,63 |
0,00 |
– 365 906,63 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support |
2014 |
Lack of checks on requirement for semi-subsistence holdings to market part of their output |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 812 405,82 |
0,00 |
– 812 405,82 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2011 |
Preferential sales price of electricity not included in the check against double financing |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 436 311,22 |
0,00 |
– 436 311,22 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2012 |
Preferential sales price of electricity not included in the check against double financing |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 3 218 840,38 |
0,00 |
– 3 218 840,38 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2013 |
Preferential sales price of electricity not included in the check against double financing |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 1 121 595,00 |
0,00 |
– 1 121 595,00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total BG: |
EUR |
– 6 142 150,47 |
0,00 |
– 6 142 150,47 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
DE |
Certification |
2013 |
Financial errors identified by the Certification Body |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 977,11 |
0,00 |
– 977,11 |
|
Certification |
2014 |
Financial errors identified by the Certification Body |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 708,76 |
0,00 |
– 708,76 |
|
Certification |
2012 |
Financial errors identified by the CB |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 496,49 |
0,00 |
– 496,49 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total DE: |
EUR |
– 2 182,36 |
0,00 |
– 2 182,36 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
DK |
Certification |
2012 |
EAFRD MLE |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 1 001 809,47 |
– 307 761,24 |
– 694 048,23 |
|
Certification |
2014 |
Error detected in the re-performance of OTSC in the EAFRD non-IACS population |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 2,01 |
0,00 |
– 2,01 |
|
Certification |
2014 |
Errors detected in the re-performance of OTSC in the EAFRD IACS population |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 93,35 |
0,00 |
– 93,35 |
|
Certification |
2013 |
Financial errors identified in the compliance testing for the EAFRD non-IACS population |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 126,37 |
– 3,35 |
– 123,02 |
|
Certification |
2013 |
MLE for the EAFRD non-IACS population |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 837 801,30 |
– 15 027,43 |
– 822 773,87 |
|
Certification |
2014 |
MLE in the EAFRD non-IACS population |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 193 310,80 |
– 4 445,75 |
– 188 865,05 |
|
Certification |
2012 |
Not recovered financial errors from FY2012 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 105,59 |
– 0,63 |
– 104,96 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total DK: |
EUR |
– 2 033 248,89 |
– 327 238,40 |
– 1 706 010,49 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
ES |
Cross Compliance |
2012 |
Deficiencies in the effectiveness of OTSC, partial coverage of 7 SMRs, incorrect treatment of late notification and of missing ear tags (SMR7 and 8), CY 2011 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 218 631,80 |
0,00 |
– 218 631,80 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2013 |
Deficiencies in the effectiveness of OTSC, partial coverage of 7 SMRs, incorrect treatment of late notification and of missing ear tags (SMR7 and 8), CY 2011 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 43 203,42 |
0,00 |
– 43 203,42 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2012 |
Deficiencies in the effectiveness of OTSC, partial coverage of 7 SMRs, incorrect treatment of late notification and of missing ear tags (SMR7 and 8), CY 2012 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 5,43 |
0,00 |
– 5,43 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2013 |
Deficiencies in the effectiveness of OTSC, partial coverage of 7 SMRs, incorrect treatment of late notification and of missing ear tags (SMR7 and 8), CY 2012 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 171 297,45 |
0,00 |
– 171 297,45 |
|
Certification |
2013 |
EAFRD non-IACS population outstanding corrections from previous years. |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 13 337,67 |
– 13 324,84 |
– 12,83 |
|
Certification |
2013 |
Errors identified in the substantive testing of EAFRD non-IACS population. MLE. |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 110 102,63 |
– 4 469,05 |
– 105 633,58 |
|
Certification |
2012 |
Extrapolated error for EAFRD non-IACS population |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 2 532 066,96 |
– 494 665,62 |
– 2 037 401,34 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2009 |
M125: the controls on the eligibility of the projects under M125 not satisfactory |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 5 995,99 |
0,00 |
– 5 995,99 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2012 |
M125: the controls on the eligibility of the projects under M125 not satisfactory |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 227 944,41 |
0,00 |
– 227 944,41 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2010 |
Weaknesses in M 123: selection criteria; costs reasonableness assessment; verification of the SME criteria |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 2 758,71 |
– 1 090,07 |
– 1 668,64 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2011 |
Weaknesses in M 123: selection criteria; costs reasonableness assessment; verification of the SME criteria |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 5 565,88 |
0,00 |
– 5 565,88 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2011 |
Weaknesses in M 123: selection criteria; costs reasonableness assessment; verification of the SME criteria |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 397 882,31 |
0,00 |
– 397 882,31 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2012 |
Weaknesses in M 123: selection criteria; costs reasonableness assessment; verification of the SME criteria |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 11 170,64 |
0,00 |
– 11 170,64 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2012 |
Weaknesses in M 123: selection criteria; costs reasonableness assessment; verification of the SME criteria |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 1 528 198,12 |
0,00 |
– 1 528 198,12 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2013 |
Weaknesses in M 123: selection criteria; costs reasonableness assessment; verification of the SME criteria |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 91 853,90 |
0,00 |
– 91 853,90 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2013 |
Weaknesses in M 123: selection criteria; costs reasonableness assessment; verification of the SME criteria |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 1 574 201,32 |
0,00 |
– 1 574 201,32 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries |
2014 |
Weaknesses in M 123: selection criteria; costs reasonableness assessment; verification of the SME criteria |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 51 302,36 |
0,00 |
– 51 302,36 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries |
2014 |
Weaknesses in M 123: selection criteria; costs reasonableness assessment; verification of the SME criteria |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 1 022 883,10 |
0,00 |
– 1 022 883,10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total ES: |
EUR |
– 8 008 402,10 |
– 513 549,58 |
– 7 494 852,52 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
FI |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013) |
2012 |
Weakness in verification of the reasonableness of costs in Measure 413 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 166 858,19 |
0,00 |
– 166 858,19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total FI: |
EUR |
– 166 858,19 |
0,00 |
– 166 858,19 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
GB |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013) |
2013 |
Lack of appropriate checks on double financing (key control) |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 3 008,34 |
0,00 |
– 3 008,34 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013) |
2013 |
Lack of appropriate checks on the eligibility of the costs of the operation (key control) |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 204 505,57 |
0,00 |
– 204 505,57 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total GB: |
EUR |
– 207 513,91 |
0,00 |
– 207 513,91 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
IE |
Certification |
2014 |
Known errors identified in the EAFRD IACS population |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 4 006,11 |
0,00 |
– 4 006,11 |
|
Certification |
2014 |
Known errors identified in the EAFRD Non IACS population |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 7 553,44 |
– 62,31 |
– 7 491,13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total IE: |
EUR |
– 11 559,55 |
– 62,31 |
– 11 497,24 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
IT |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2011 |
Number of errors in the files resulting from a weak control system. |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 322 955,33 |
– 119 880,04 |
– 203 075,29 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — others (2007-2013) |
2012 |
Number of errors in the files resulting from a weak control system. |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 17 259,86 |
0,00 |
– 17 259,86 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2012 |
Number of errors in the files resulting from a weak control system. |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 1 048 678,11 |
– 105 713,76 |
– 942 964,35 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2013 |
Number of errors in the files resulting from a weak control system. |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 1 610 347,46 |
– 8 580,00 |
– 1 601 767,46 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 (2007-2013) |
2007 |
On-the-spot checks risk analysis not properly updated |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 9 065,98 |
– 1 091,16 |
– 7 974,82 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2008 |
On-the-spot checks risk analysis not properly updated |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 407,39 |
0,00 |
– 407,39 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2009 |
On-the-spot checks risk analysis not properly updated |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 4 029,20 |
– 588,01 |
– 3 441,19 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2010 |
On-the-spot checks risk analysis not properly updated |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 45 823,63 |
– 2 648,46 |
– 43 175,17 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2011 |
On-the-spot checks risk analysis not properly updated |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 93 330,46 |
– 3 893,24 |
– 89 437,22 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2012 |
On-the-spot checks risk analysis not properly updated |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 320 482,97 |
– 25 971,96 |
– 294 511,01 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2013 |
On-the-spot checks risk analysis not properly updated |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 424 992,50 |
– 47 702,52 |
– 377 289,98 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries |
2014 |
On-the-spot checks risk analysis not properly updated |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 178 543,97 |
– 21 276,84 |
– 157 267,13 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 (2007-2013) |
2007 |
Reasonableness of the costs not properly assessed |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 2 727,89 |
0,00 |
– 2 727,89 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2009 |
Reasonableness of the costs not properly assessed |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 1 470,04 |
0,00 |
– 1 470,04 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2010 |
Reasonableness of the costs not properly assessed |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 6 621,14 |
0,00 |
– 6 621,14 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2011 |
Reasonableness of the costs not properly assessed |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 9 733,10 |
0,00 |
– 9 733,10 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2012 |
Reasonableness of the costs not properly assessed |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 64 929,91 |
0,00 |
– 64 929,91 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2013 |
Reasonableness of the costs not properly assessed |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 119 256,29 |
0,00 |
– 119 256,29 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries |
2014 |
Reasonableness of the costs not properly assessed |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 53 192,08 |
0,00 |
– 53 192,08 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total IT: |
EUR |
– 4 333 847,31 |
– 337 345,99 |
– 3 996 501,32 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
MT |
Certification |
2014 |
Financial errors detected in the' compliance testing of the EAFRD Non-IACS population and known errors in the Advances & Securities of the EAFRD expenditure. |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 73 406,00 |
0,00 |
– 73 406,00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total MT: |
EUR |
– 73 406,00 |
0,00 |
– 73 406,00 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
NL |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2013 |
Exclude expenditure due to lack of procurement procedure |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 85 000,00 |
0,00 |
– 85 000,00 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Investment — public beneficiaries |
2014 |
Weaknesses in the checks of the procurement correction based on the recalculation of the error rate |
EXTRAPOLATED |
0,81 % |
EUR |
– 105 036,34 |
0,00 |
– 105 036,34 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2013 |
Weaknesses in the checks of the public procurement, based on the recalculation of the error rate |
EXTRAPOLATED |
0,81 % |
EUR |
– 116 704,26 |
– 328,69 |
– 116 375,57 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Investment — public beneficiaries |
2014 |
Weaknesses in the checks of the reasonableness of the cost correction applied on 52,26 % of the expenditure |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 709 760,04 |
0,00 |
– 709 760,04 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2013 |
Weaknesses in the checks of the reasonableness of the costs, correction applied on 52,26 % of the expenditure |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 788 603,51 |
– 2 221,05 |
– 786 382,46 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total NL: |
EUR |
– 1 805 104,15 |
– 2 549,74 |
– 1 802 554,41 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
PT |
Rural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries |
2010 |
Insufficient assessment of the reasonableness of the investment costs |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 278 756,48 |
0,00 |
– 278 756,48 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries |
2011 |
Insufficient assessment of the reasonableness of the investment costs |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 757 851,45 |
– 271 077,60 |
– 486 773,85 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries |
2012 |
Insufficient assessment of the reasonableness of the investment costs |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 419 869,93 |
– 55 060,96 |
– 364 808,97 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries |
2013 |
Insufficient assessment of the reasonableness of the investment costs |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 324 408,44 |
0,00 |
– 324 408,44 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries |
2014 |
Insufficient assessment of the reasonableness of the investment costs |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 209 924,00 |
0,00 |
– 209 924,00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total PT: |
EUR |
– 1 990 810,30 |
– 326 138,56 |
– 1 664 671,74 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
RO |
Cross Compliance |
2013 |
Absence of risk analysis for animal identification SMRs, SMR1 and 5 not checked for all farmers, no specific criteria for the selection of the parcel during OTSC, CY2012 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 97 630,09 |
0,00 |
– 97 630,09 |
|
Certification |
2010 |
MLE EAFRD Non-IACS population FY2010 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 4 653 241,82 |
– 275 778,82 |
– 4 377 463,00 |
|
Certification |
2011 |
MLE EAFRD Non-IACS population FY2011 |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 3 210 679,11 |
– 267 668,25 |
– 2 943 010,86 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2012 |
No control of the minimum requirement for the use of plant protection products and inefficient control of the minimum requirement for the use of fertilisers, CY2011 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 887 541,50 |
0,00 |
– 887 541,50 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2013 |
No control of the minimum requirement for the use of plant protection products and inefficient control of the minimum requirement for the use of fertilisers, CY2011 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 24 239,06 |
0,00 |
– 24 239,06 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2013 |
No control of the minimum requirement for the use of plant protection products and inefficient control of the minimum requirement for the use of fertilisers, CY2012 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 950 060,57 |
0,00 |
– 950 060,57 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2014 |
No control of the minimum requirement for the use of plant protection products and inefficient control of the minimum requirement for the use of fertilisers, CY2013 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 390 637,48 |
0,00 |
– 390 637,48 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2010 |
Non respect of 5 year commitment for AEM |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 975 531,89 |
– 33 285,00 |
– 942 246,89 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2011 |
Non respect of 5 year commitment for AEM |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 1 798 686,77 |
– 89 934,34 |
– 1 708 752,43 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2012 |
Non respect of 5 year commitment for AEM |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 2 866 913,52 |
– 15 400,00 |
– 2 851 513,52 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — others (2007-2013) |
2012 |
Weaknesses in: artificial conditions |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 148 810,96 |
0,00 |
– 148 810,96 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2009 |
Weaknesses in: artificial conditions and reasonableness of costs verification and selection criteria |
FLAT RATE |
25,00 % |
EUR |
– 11 702,85 |
0,00 |
– 11 702,85 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2010 |
Weaknesses in: artificial conditions and reasonableness of costs verification and selection criteria |
FLAT RATE |
25,00 % |
EUR |
– 321 762,57 |
0,00 |
– 321 762,57 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2011 |
Weaknesses in: artificial conditions and reasonableness of costs verification and selection criteria |
FLAT RATE |
25,00 % |
EUR |
– 14 714 299,52 |
0,00 |
– 14 714 299,52 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2012 |
Weaknesses in: artificial conditions and reasonableness of costs verification and selection criteria |
FLAT RATE |
25,00 % |
EUR |
– 7 046 834,54 |
0,00 |
– 7 046 834,54 |
|
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2013 |
Weaknesses in: artificial conditions and reasonableness of costs verification and selection criteria |
FLAT RATE |
25,00 % |
EUR |
– 5 791 393,96 |
0,00 |
– 5 791 393,96 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total RO: |
EUR |
– 43 889 966,21 |
– 682 066,41 |
– 43 207 899,80 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
SI |
Cross Compliance |
2013 |
Weaknesses in the OTSC's of SMR 1, SMR 16, SMR 17, SMR 18 and the evaluation grid. CY 2012 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 63 628,41 |
0,00 |
– 63 628,41 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2014 |
Weaknesses in the OTSC's of SMR 1, SMR 16, SMR 17, SMR 18 and the evaluation grid. CY 2012 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
151,64 |
0,00 |
151,64 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2014 |
Weaknesses in the OTSC's of SMR 1, SMR 16, SMR 17, SMR 18 and the evaluation grid. CY 2013 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 135 503,29 |
0,00 |
– 135 503,29 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2015 |
Weaknesses in the OTSC's of SMR 1, SMR 16, SMR 17, SMR 18 and the evaluation grid. CY 2014 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 72 243,26 |
0,00 |
– 72 243,26 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total SI: |
EUR |
– 271 223,32 |
0,00 |
– 271 223,32 |
Member State |
Measure |
FY |
Reason |
Type |
Correction % |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
SK |
Certification |
2014 |
Financial clearance, EAFRD Non-IACS population Most Likely Error |
ONE OFF |
|
EUR |
– 697 749,56 |
0,00 |
– 697 749,56 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2012 |
One GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2011 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 540 903,88 |
0,00 |
– 540 903,88 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2013 |
One GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2011 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 4 718,01 |
0,00 |
– 4 718,01 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2014 |
One GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2011 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
41,95 |
0,00 |
41,95 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2012 |
One GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2012 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 24,22 |
0,00 |
– 24,22 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2013 |
One GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2012 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 538 813,81 |
0,00 |
– 538 813,81 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2014 |
One GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2012 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 1 195,01 |
0,00 |
– 1 195,01 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2013 |
One GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2013 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 17,66 |
0,00 |
– 17,66 |
|
Cross Compliance |
2014 |
One GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2013 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 179 779,34 |
0,00 |
– 179 779,34 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total SK: |
EUR |
– 1 963 159,54 |
0,00 |
– 1 963 159,54 |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial Impact |
EUR |
– 71 193 175,71 |
– 2 189 223,27 |
– 69 003 952,44 |
18.11.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 312/73 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2016/2019
of 16 November 2016
on the approval pursuant to Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of modified traffic distribution rules for the airports Milan Malpensa, Milan Linate and Orio al Serio (Bergamo)
(notified under document C(2016) 7244)
(Only the Italian text is authentic)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (1), and in particular Article 19(3) thereof,
After consulting the Advisory Committee,
Whereas:
1. PROCEDURE
(1) |
By letter of 13 May 2016, received by the Commission on 20 May 2016, the Italian authorities informed the Commission, pursuant to Article 19(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008, of a new draft Decree on modified traffic distribution rules for the airports Milan Malpensa, Milan Linate and Orio al Serio (Bergamo). |
2. BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURE
2.1. The Bersani and Bersani 2 Decree
(2) |
By Commission Decision of 21 December 2000, the Commission declared compatible with Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 (2), which has since been repealed and replaced by Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008, the traffic distribution rules for the Milan airport system set out in the Decree of the Minister for Infrastructure and Transport of 3 March 2000 (3) (hereinafter the ‘Bersani Decree’). The Commission's decision was subject to these rules being amended as indicated by the Italian authorities in a letter of 4 December 2000. This amendment took place through the Decree of the Minister for Infrastructure and Transport of 5 January 2001 (4) (hereinafter the ‘Bersani 2 Decree’). |
(3) |
The Milan airport system comprised the airports of Malpensa, Linate and Orio al Serio (Bergamo). |
(4) |
The objective of the Bersani Decree and Bersani 2 Decree was to ensure the realisation of the full development potential of Milan Malpensa airport as an international hub, whilst at the same time describing Milan Linate airport as a facility for point to point services. To this end, the Bersani Decree and Bersani 2 Decree contained several provisions; in particular they imposed, at Milan Linate airport, limitations on the number of daily return services to EU airports identified on the basis of passenger traffic volume, as follows:
|
(5) |
From Linate, Community carriers may, with the arrangements set out immediately above, operate a daily return service using two time slots to airport systems or individual airports located in ‘Objective 1’ regions which in the course of the 1999 calendar year registered passenger traffic of fewer than 350 000 units in the Milan airport system. |
(6) |
The Bersani 2 Decree specifies that all European capitals will have at least one return trip connection per day with Linate and that Community airports with annual traffic of more than 40 million passengers in 1999 will be connected to Linate by at least two return trips per day. |
(7) |
The Bersani Decree and Bersani 2 Decree also restricted Milan Linate airport to single aisle aircraft for point-to-point scheduled connections within the EU only. |
2.2. The Lupi Decree and the Commission decision
(8) |
By letter of 21 April 2015, received by the Commission on 21 April 2015, the Italian authorities informed the Commission, pursuant to Article 19(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008, of the Ministerial Decree No 395 of 1 October 2014 amending Decree No 15 of 3 March 2000 on the distribution of air traffic within the Milan airport system, as amended (5) (hereinafter the ‘Lupi Decree’). |
(9) |
On 17 December 2015 the Commission adopted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 a negative decision on Ministerial Decree No 395 of 1 October 2014 (6). The Commission found that, contrary to the provisions of this Regulation, Italy had failed to consult interested parties before modifying the traffic distribution rules. |
2.3. The new draft Decree
(10) |
Italy therefore prepared a new draft Decree and informed the Commission thereof. The draft Decree, when adopted and entered into force, will modify the traffic distribution rules for the airports of Malpensa, Linate and Orio al Serio (Bergamo) in the same way as the Lupi Decree did. It will thus remove the limitations at Linate airport as set out in recitals 4 to 6 above, i.e. based on the number of daily return services to EU airports identified on the basis of passenger traffic volume. The limitation regarding Linate airport to point-to-point scheduled connections within the EU only, operated with narrow-body (single-aisle) aircraft (recital 7 above), will remain in place. |
(11) |
The notified draft Decree will repeal the Lupi Decree. |
(12) |
The Italian authorities summarised the objectives of the new draft Decree as follows:
|
(13) |
Thus, Milan Malpensa will be available for intercontinental and non-EU traffic operated by European and non-European airlines without any restrictions on the type of aircraft or destinations, within the limits of the airport's capacity, while Milan Linate will be available solely for intra-EU traffic operated by European airlines using a specific type of aircraft (narrow-bodied) and on the basis of point-to-point connections. |
(14) |
The Italian authorities argue that, in view of the forecasted growth and congestion of the main EU airports due to the rapid expansion of low-cost carriers and non-EU carriers, it is necessary to adapt the offer of air traffic services and lift restrictions. Further, initially the limitations on Linate were imposed to support Milan Malpensa in its start-up phase. The authorities argue that traffic data shows that this is no longer necessary. |
(15) |
The new draft Decree also allows airlines to determine their own connections with European cities on the basis of their own commercial requirements and meet passenger demands more effectively. This is expected to boost competition and benefit passengers. |
2.4. Consultation conducted by the Italian authorities
(16) |
The Italian authorities conducted a consultation prior to the notification of the intended amendments to the Commission. |
(17) |
Three meetings were organised with interested parties, namely airlines which hold slots at Linate, associations representing the airlines (IBAR and Assaereo) and the airport coordination committee (AOC). These meetings took place on 23 November 2015, 17 December 2015, and 27 January 2016. The Commission has received the minutes of those meetings. |
(18) |
According to the Italian authorities, only a minority of European airlines expressed negative opinions about the measures and no proposals for amendments were made. |
3. CONSULTATION CONDUCTED BY THE COMMISSION
(19) |
The Commission published a summary of the modified traffic distribution rules notified by the Italian authorities in the Official Journal of the European Union (7) and invited interested parties to submit comments. |
(20) |
The Commission received comments from six interested parties, most of which wished to remain anonymous. |
3.1. Comments from interested parties
(21) |
Some interested parties argued that the Italian authorities failed to properly consult with the airline users, as airlines were invited to a number of meetings at very short notice and without agendas published prior to the meeting. In addition, no feedback on the comments of the parties was provided. |
(22) |
Other interested parties expressed their support to the new draft Decree pointing out that the Decree has the effect of rationalising air traffic at Linate, and allows airlines to use their slots at Linate more efficiently. These interested parties further stated that the consultation, which has been carried out by the Italian authorities, has shown that no airline has been negatively affected by the Lupi Decree; on the contrary, subsequently to the adoption of the Linate Decree there has been the opening of new routes to/from Linate on European and national destinations, not allowed under the previous regulation. |
4. THE TERMS OF ARTICLE 19 OF REGULATION (EC) No 1008/2008
(23) |
Article 19(2) of the Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 provides that a Member State, after consultation with interested parties, may regulate, without discrimination among destinations inside the Community and on grounds of nationality or identity of air carriers, the distribution of air traffic between airports satisfying the following conditions:
|
(24) |
Further, the distribution of air traffic between the airports concerned shall respect the principles of proportionality and transparency, and shall be based on objective criteria. |
(25) |
Article 19(3) of the Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 provides that a Member State concerned shall inform the Commission of its intention to regulate the distribution of air traffic or to change an existing traffic distribution rule. It also provides that the Commission shall examine the application of Article 19(2) and, within 6 months of receipt of the information from the Member State, and after having asked the Committee set up in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 for opinion shall decide whether the Member State may apply the measures. It adds that the Commission shall publish its decision in the Official Journal of the European Union and that the measures shall not be applied before the publication of the Commission's approval. |
5. ASSESSMENT
(26) |
At the outset, the Commission observes that the three airports in question, Milan Linate, Milan Malpensa and Orio al Serio (Bergamo), satisfy the requirements set out in the first subparagraph of Article 19(2). The airports serve the conurbation of Milan (point (a) of the provision referred to). The infrastructure and public transport links between the airports and between them and the city of Milan are such as to comply with points (b) and (c) thereof. In addition, the airports provide the necessary services to air carriers in a manner that satisfies the requirements of point (d) thereof. |
(27) |
On the substance, the new draft Decree removes certain limitations imposed on services at Linate airport. This constitutes a change in the measures of the Bersani Decree and Bersani 2 Decree on traffic distribution between the airports serving the city of Milan within the meaning of Article 19(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008. |
(28) |
The measure concerns the removal of existing limitations that were based on passenger traffic volume and, as such, liberalise air traffic, without having restrictive effects in other ways. It should enable air carriers to operate more efficiently, which is in line with the general objective of Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008. |
(29) |
Insofar as the measures constitute the removal of limitations concerning the access to and from Linate, in order to allow airlines greater efficiency and choice in setting their schedules according to passenger demand, the question of proportionality does not arise. |
(30) |
The most recurrent comment put forward by interested parties relates to the consultation carried out by the Italian authorities. |
(31) |
In this respect, it is observed that Article 19(2) does not specify in detail in which way such consultation should take place, but implies that the consultation be meaningful. |
(32) |
As regards the present case, the Commission notes that the Italian authorities organised three meetings at which interested parties had the opportunity to express their views on the measures. While, as stated by some of the interested parties, the first two meetings were arranged at short notice, the third meeting was postponed at the request of the interested parties, so that the appropriate representatives of the respective parties could attend. Further, the Italian authorities provided the minutes of the three meetings to the Commission, which show that the parties did make their positions known to the Italian authorities. |
(33) |
Thus, since the interested parties were notified of the new measures and had the opportunity to meaningfully comment on the measures, the Commission considers that Italy complied with the consultation requirement laid down in Article 19(2). |
6. CONCLUSION
(34) |
In conclusion, the Commission considers that the intended amendment to the traffic distribution rules is compatible with Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008. |
(35) |
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Advisory Committee referred to in Article 25 of the Regulation, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
The measures provided for in the new draft Decree, submitted to the Commission on 13 May 2016, are hereby approved.
Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Italian Republic.
Done at Brussels, 16 November 2016.
For the Commission
Violeta BULC
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 293, 31.10.2008, p. 3.
(2) Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes (OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 8). As regards this repeal, see Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008.
(3) Italian Official Gazette No 60 of 13 March 2000.
(4) Italian Official Gazette No 14 of 18 January 2001.
(5) Italian Official Gazette No 237 of 11 October 2014.