Margin based cost allocation: Unlocking Financial Efficiency: Margin based Cost Allocation for Marketing Campaigns

1. What is margin-based cost allocation and why is it important for marketing campaigns?

One of the most challenging aspects of marketing is to measure and optimize the return on investment (ROI) of different campaigns. Traditionally, marketers have used various methods of cost allocation, such as first-touch, last-touch, or multi-touch attribution, to assign credit to the channels and activities that influenced a customer's purchase decision. However, these methods have some limitations, such as:

- They do not account for the marginal contribution of each channel or activity, i.e., how much additional revenue or profit was generated by spending an extra dollar on a specific campaign.

- They do not consider the interactions and synergies between different channels or activities, i.e., how the performance of one campaign affects the performance of another.

- They do not reflect the opportunity cost of allocating resources to one campaign over another, i.e., what is the best way to allocate a fixed budget across multiple campaigns to maximize roi.

To overcome these limitations, a more sophisticated and effective method of cost allocation is margin-based cost allocation. This method is based on the following principles:

- The objective of marketing is to maximize the total margin, i.e., the difference between the total revenue and the total cost of all campaigns.

- The cost of each campaign is allocated proportionally to its marginal contribution to the total margin, i.e., the change in the total margin that results from a change in the spending on that campaign.

- The marginal contribution of each campaign is calculated using a mathematical model that captures the relationships and interactions between different campaigns, as well as the effects of external factors such as seasonality, competition, and customer behavior.

By using margin-based cost allocation, marketers can achieve several benefits, such as:

- They can optimize the ROI of each campaign by finding the optimal level of spending that maximizes its marginal contribution to the total margin.

- They can compare the performance of different campaigns based on a common metric, i.e., the margin per dollar spent, and allocate resources accordingly.

- They can identify and eliminate inefficient or ineffective campaigns that have a negative or low marginal contribution to the total margin.

- They can simulate and forecast the impact of changes in the marketing mix, such as adding, removing, or modifying campaigns, on the total margin and ROI.

To illustrate the concept of margin-based cost allocation, let us consider a simple example. Suppose a company has two marketing campaigns, A and B, that generate the following revenues and costs:

| Campaign | Revenue | Cost |

| A | $100,000 | $50,000 |

| B | $200,000 | $100,000 |

| Total | $300,000 | $150,000 |

Using a traditional method of cost allocation, such as revenue-based allocation, the cost of each campaign would be allocated proportionally to its revenue, as follows:

| Campaign | Revenue | Cost | Revenue-based allocation |

| A | $100,000 | $50,000 | $50,000 / $300,000 * $150,000 = $25,000 |

| B | $200,000 | $100,000 | $200,000 / $300,000 * $150,000 = $100,000 |

| Total | $300,000 | $150,000 | $150,000 |

However, this method does not reflect the marginal contribution of each campaign to the total margin. To calculate the marginal contribution, we need to use a mathematical model that estimates the revenue and cost functions of each campaign, as well as the cross-effects between them. For simplicity, let us assume that the model is given by the following equations:

- Revenue of campaign A: $R_A = 100,000 - 0.5 S_A + 0.2 S_B$

- Revenue of campaign B: $R_B = 200,000 - 0.4 S_B + 0.1 S_A$

- Cost of campaign A: $C_A = 50,000 + 0.2 * S_A$

- Cost of campaign B: $C_B = 100,000 + 0.3 * S_B$

Where $S_A$ and $S_B$ are the spending levels on campaigns A and B, respectively. Using these equations, we can calculate the marginal contribution of each campaign to the total margin, i.e., the change in the total margin that results from a change in the spending on that campaign, as follows:

- Marginal contribution of campaign A: $MC_A = \frac{\partial (R_A - C_A + R_B - C_B)}{\partial S_A} = -0.5 + 0.2 - 0.2 + 0.1 = -0.4$

- Marginal contribution of campaign B: $MC_B = \frac{\partial (R_A - C_A + R_B - C_B)}{\partial S_B} = 0.2 + 0.1 - 0.3 - 0.4 = -0.4$

Using these values, we can allocate the cost of each campaign proportionally to its marginal contribution, as follows:

| Campaign | Revenue | Cost | Margin-based allocation |

| A | $100,000 | $50,000 | $-0.4 / (-0.4 + -0.4) * $150,000 = $75,000 |

| B | $200,000 | $100,000 | $-0.4 / (-0.4 + -0.4) * $150,000 = $75,000 |

| Total | $300,000 | $150,000 | $150,000 |

As we can see, the margin-based allocation is different from the revenue-based allocation, and it reflects the fact that both campaigns have the same marginal contribution to the total margin. This means that increasing or decreasing the spending on either campaign by one dollar would have the same effect on the total margin, which is a decrease of 0.4 dollars. Therefore, the optimal level of spending on each campaign is the current level, and any deviation from it would reduce the total margin and ROI.

This example shows how margin-based cost allocation can help marketers measure and optimize the performance of different campaigns, and how it differs from traditional methods of cost allocation. However, it is important to note that this method requires a reliable and accurate mathematical model that captures the complex and dynamic relationships between different campaigns and external factors. Therefore, marketers need to use advanced tools and techniques, such as machine learning, data analytics, and experimentation, to build and validate such models, and to update them regularly to reflect the changing market conditions and customer behavior. By doing so, they can unlock the full potential of margin-based cost allocation and achieve higher levels of financial efficiency and effectiveness in their marketing activities.

2. How they can lead to inaccurate and inefficient decisions?

One of the most important aspects of financial management is cost allocation, which is the process of assigning costs to different activities, products, or services based on their consumption of resources. Cost allocation helps managers to measure the profitability and efficiency of their operations, as well as to make informed decisions about resource allocation, pricing, and budgeting. However, not all cost allocation methods are equally effective, and some of them can lead to serious problems and pitfalls. In this section, we will discuss some of the main challenges and limitations of traditional cost allocation methods, such as:

- Arbitrary and subjective criteria: Traditional cost allocation methods often rely on arbitrary and subjective criteria to assign costs to different activities or products. For example, some methods use the volume of output, the number of units, or the direct labor hours as the basis for allocating overhead costs, which are the indirect costs that cannot be easily traced to a specific activity or product. However, these criteria may not reflect the actual consumption of resources or the complexity of the processes involved. As a result, some activities or products may be overcosted or undercosted, leading to distorted profitability and performance measures. For instance, a high-volume product that requires less resources and less complex processes may be allocated more overhead costs than a low-volume product that requires more resources and more complex processes, creating a false impression that the former is less profitable and the latter is more profitable.

- Lack of flexibility and adaptability: Traditional cost allocation methods are often rigid and static, meaning that they do not change or adjust to the changing business environment and customer needs. For example, some methods use predetermined rates or percentages to allocate costs, which are based on historical data or estimates that may not be accurate or relevant in the current or future periods. Moreover, some methods use a single or a few cost drivers to allocate costs, which may not capture the diversity and variability of the activities or products. As a result, some costs may be overallocated or underallocated, leading to inaccurate and outdated information and analysis. For instance, a predetermined rate that is based on the average cost per unit may not reflect the actual cost per unit in the current period, due to changes in the input prices, the production volume, the product mix, or the customer demand. Similarly, a single cost driver that is based on the number of units may not reflect the actual consumption of resources by different products, due to differences in the size, quality, features, or customization of the products.

- Lack of transparency and accountability: Traditional cost allocation methods often lack transparency and accountability, meaning that they do not provide clear and detailed information about the sources and destinations of the costs, and they do not hold the managers and employees responsible for the costs they incur or the benefits they generate. For example, some methods use a single or a few cost pools to aggregate and allocate costs, which may hide or obscure the specific activities or processes that consume the resources or the specific products or services that benefit from the resources. Moreover, some methods use a top-down or a bottom-up approach to allocate costs, which may create a disconnect or a conflict between the different levels of the organization or the different functions of the business. As a result, some costs may be ignored or overlooked, leading to inefficiency and waste. For instance, a single cost pool that includes all the overhead costs may not reveal the individual activities or processes that cause the costs to increase or decrease, or the individual products or services that require more or less resources. Similarly, a top-down approach that allocates costs from the corporate level to the divisional level may not align with the goals and incentives of the divisional managers and employees, or a bottom-up approach that allocates costs from the activity level to the product level may not reflect the strategic priorities and customer preferences of the business.

3. How it can improve the profitability and performance of your marketing campaigns?

One of the main challenges of marketing campaigns is to allocate costs efficiently and effectively. Traditional methods of cost allocation, such as activity-based costing or direct costing, may not capture the true impact of marketing activities on the bottom line. These methods often ignore the margin contribution of each campaign, which is the difference between the revenue generated and the variable costs incurred by the campaign. Margin-based cost allocation is a novel approach that assigns costs to marketing campaigns based on their margin contribution. This way, the campaigns that generate more profit for the business receive more resources, while the campaigns that are less profitable or even loss-making are scaled down or eliminated. By using margin-based cost allocation, marketers can improve the profitability and performance of their marketing campaigns in several ways:

- It aligns the marketing objectives with the business goals. Margin-based cost allocation ensures that the marketing campaigns are focused on maximizing the profit margin, which is the ultimate goal of any business. This helps to avoid wasting resources on campaigns that may generate high revenue but low margin, or vice versa. It also helps to prioritize the campaigns that target the most profitable segments, products, or channels.

- It provides a clear and consistent measure of marketing effectiveness. Margin-based cost allocation allows marketers to evaluate the performance of their campaigns based on a single and objective metric: the margin contribution. This metric reflects the true value of each campaign to the business, and it can be easily compared across different campaigns, time periods, or scenarios. It also eliminates the need for arbitrary or subjective adjustments, such as allocating fixed costs or overheads to marketing campaigns.

- It enables better decision making and optimization. Margin-based cost allocation gives marketers the information and the incentive to optimize their marketing mix and budget allocation. By knowing the margin contribution of each campaign, marketers can identify the best opportunities to increase their return on investment (ROI) and reduce their cost per acquisition (CPA). They can also test and experiment with different marketing strategies and tactics, and measure their impact on the margin contribution.

- It fosters a culture of accountability and transparency. Margin-based cost allocation creates a clear link between the marketing actions and the financial outcomes. This helps to establish a culture of accountability and transparency within the marketing team and across the organization. It also facilitates the communication and collaboration between the marketing department and other functions, such as finance, sales, or operations, as they share a common language and a common goal.

To illustrate how margin-based cost allocation can improve the profitability and performance of marketing campaigns, let us consider an example of a hypothetical online retailer that sells three types of products: A, B, and C. The retailer runs three marketing campaigns: X, Y, and Z, each targeting a different segment of customers. The table below shows the revenue, variable costs, and margin contribution of each product and campaign, as well as the total marketing costs and the marketing cost allocation based on the traditional direct costing method and the margin-based cost allocation method.

| Product | Revenue | Variable cost | Margin Contribution | Campaign | Revenue | Variable Cost | Margin Contribution | Total Marketing Cost | Marketing Cost allocation (Direct Costing) | marketing Cost allocation (Margin-Based Costing) |

| A | $100 | $40 | $60 | X | $300 | $120 | $180 | $150 | $50 | $75 |

| B | $80 | $50 | $30 | Y | $240 | $150 | $90 | $150 | $50 | $45 |

| C | $60 | $30 | $30 | Z | $180 | $90 | $90 | $150 | $50 | $45 |

As we can see from the table, the margin-based cost allocation method assigns more marketing costs to the campaign X, which has the highest margin contribution, and less marketing costs to the campaigns Y and Z, which have lower margin contributions. This results in a more accurate and fair reflection of the profitability of each campaign, as shown in the table below.

| Campaign | Revenue | Variable Cost | Margin Contribution | Marketing Cost (Direct Costing) | Marketing Cost (Margin-Based Costing) | Profit (Direct Costing) | Profit (Margin-Based Costing) | ROI (Direct Costing) | ROI (Margin-Based Costing) |

| X | $300 | $120 | $180 | $50 | $75 | $130 | $105 | 260% | 140% |

| Y | $240 | $150 | $90 | $50 | $45 | $40 | $45 | 80% | 100% |

| Z | $180 | $90 | $90 | $50 | $45 | $40 | $45 | 80% | 100% |

By using the margin-based cost allocation method, the retailer can see that the campaign X is still the most profitable, but not as much as it seemed under the direct costing method. The campaigns Y and Z are equally profitable, but they have a lower ROI than the campaign X. Based on this information, the retailer can decide to allocate more marketing budget to the campaign X, or to optimize the campaigns Y and Z to increase their margin contribution. Alternatively, the retailer can explore other marketing options that may offer a higher margin contribution and ROI than the current campaigns.

4. How to get started with margin-based cost allocation and what to expect from it?

We have seen how margin-based cost allocation can help marketers optimize their campaigns and achieve higher financial efficiency. But how can you implement this method in your own organization and what are the benefits and challenges of doing so? Here are some points to consider:

- 1. Define your margin goals and metrics. Before you can allocate costs based on margins, you need to have a clear idea of what margins you are aiming for and how you will measure them. For example, you might want to use gross margin, net margin, contribution margin, or return on ad spend (ROAS) as your key performance indicators (KPIs). You also need to decide how you will calculate these metrics for each campaign, product, or customer segment. For instance, you might use historical data, market research, or customer lifetime value (CLTV) models to estimate the revenue and costs associated with each marketing activity.

- 2. choose a cost allocation method. There are different ways to allocate costs based on margins, depending on the level of granularity and accuracy you want to achieve. For example, you might use a simple percentage-based method, where you assign a fixed proportion of the total costs to each campaign based on its expected margin. Alternatively, you might use a more sophisticated optimization model, where you use mathematical formulas or algorithms to find the optimal cost allocation that maximizes your margin goals. You can also use a hybrid approach, where you combine both methods to balance simplicity and precision.

- 3. collect and analyze data. To implement margin-based cost allocation, you need to have reliable and consistent data on your marketing activities, revenues, and costs. You also need to have a system or tool that can process and integrate this data and apply your chosen cost allocation method. You might use a spreadsheet, a dashboard, a software, or a custom solution to do this. You should also monitor and evaluate the results of your cost allocation and adjust it as needed based on your performance and feedback.

- 4. Communicate and collaborate. Margin-based cost allocation is not only a technical process, but also a strategic and cultural one. You need to communicate and align your margin goals and metrics with your stakeholders, such as your management, your finance team, your sales team, and your customers. You also need to collaborate and coordinate with your marketing team and other departments to ensure that your cost allocation is consistent and fair across the organization. You should also share and celebrate your successes and learn from your failures.

By following these steps, you can start using margin-based cost allocation to improve your marketing efficiency and profitability. However, you should also be aware of the potential pitfalls and limitations of this method, such as:

- It can be complex and time-consuming. Margin-based cost allocation requires a lot of data, calculations, and assumptions, which can be challenging and costly to obtain and maintain. It also requires a lot of testing and experimentation, which can take time and resources away from other marketing activities.

- It can be inaccurate and uncertain. Margin-based cost allocation relies on estimates and projections, which can be affected by various factors, such as market conditions, customer behavior, and competitive actions. It also involves trade-offs and compromises, such as sacrificing short-term results for long-term gains, or favoring certain campaigns or products over others. These decisions can have unintended consequences and risks for your marketing performance and reputation.

- It can be controversial and contentious. Margin-based cost allocation can create conflicts and tensions within and across teams, as different stakeholders might have different opinions and interests regarding the margin goals, metrics, and methods. It can also create ethical and legal issues, such as privacy, transparency, and fairness, especially when dealing with sensitive or personal data.

Therefore, you should use margin-based cost allocation with caution and care, and always consider the context and objectives of your marketing strategy. You should also keep in mind that margin-based cost allocation is not a silver bullet, but a tool that can help you make better and smarter marketing decisions.

Read Other Blogs