Yarn vs NPM vs PNPM: Which is Best for Your Project?

Yarn vs NPM vs PNPM: Which is Best for Your Project?

In the fast-moving world of JavaScript development, one of the very first decisions you’ll make when starting a new project is which package manager to use. Three main options dominate the landscape: NPM, Yarn, and PNPM.

All three manage your dependencies, scripts, and project configuration — but each has unique features, philosophies, and trade-offs.

So the question is: Yarn vs NPM vs PNPM — which one should you pick for your next project?

What Is a JavaScript Package Manager?

A package manager is a tool that automates the process of installing, updating, configuring, and removing libraries or tools (called “packages”) in your project.

In JavaScript land, you’ll often be dealing with:

• Thousands of dependencies
• Frequent updates
• Complex version trees
• Cross-platform compatibility issues

A good package manager ensures that your development environment is consistent and that you (and your team) don’t spend hours debugging mismatched versions or broken installs.

The Contenders at a Glance

How They Work: Under the Hood

NPM

NPM is the original package manager for Node.js. It comes installed by default with Node and has evolved significantly over the years.

Pros:

• Universal compatibility.
• Huge ecosystem.
• Familiar to most developers.
• Actively improved (especially from v7+).

Cons:

• Slower installs (pre v7).
• Flat node_modules structure can cause duplication and large disk use.
• Occasional lockfile conflicts on teams.

Yarn

Yarn was built by Meta (then Facebook) to fix the shortcomings of NPM, especially in large-scale monorepos and distributed teams.

Pros:

• Fast installations (thanks to caching and parallel downloads).
• Deterministic installs using yarn.lock.
• Offline mode (caches packages).
• Plug’n’Play (no node_modules needed).

Cons:

• Steeper learning curve.
• Some features (e.g., PnP) can break older tools.
• Yarn v1 vs v2 confusion.

PNPM

PNPM takes a different approach. It uses a content-addressable store and symlinks, which drastically reduces disk usage and installation time.

Pros:

• Insanely fast.
• Minimal disk space due to de-duplication.
• Perfect for monorepos.
• Reliable and modern CLI.

Cons:

• Some niche packages might not work due to symlinks.
• Less widely adopted in enterprise.
• Developers may need some time to adjust.

Performance Benchmarks

Let’s look at real-world performance comparisons (installing 100+ packages):

Note: Results may vary slightly based on machine and network, but PNPM consistently outperforms the rest.

Feature Breakdown

1. Speed & Performance

• NPM improved significantly after v7, but still slower than alternatives.
• Yarn uses parallelism, resulting in faster installs.
• PNPM is fastest due to clever caching and symlinking.

Verdict: PNPM wins.

2. Disk Efficiency

Yarn and NPM install duplicate versions into your node_modules directory. PNPM uses a global content store and symbolic links, dramatically reducing duplication.

Verdict: PNPM wins.

3. Monorepo Support

Managing multiple packages or apps in a single codebase is becoming increasingly popular. Workspaces make this seamless.

• NPM supports it now, but it’s minimal.
• Yarn has great built-in workspace features.
• PNPM not only supports it but has advanced tooling around it.

Verdict: PNPM and Yarn tie. NPM trails.

4. Developer Experience

• NPM is simple and familiar.
• Yarn has cool UX features like interactive upgrades, audit fixes.
• PNPM has a clean CLI with helpful warnings, logs, and a smart config system.

Verdict: Subjective, but PNPM feels more modern and intentional.

5. Compatibility

• NPM is default and universally supported.
• Yarn is widely accepted, but newer v3 features like PnP can break tooling.
• PNPM breaks some old scripts that assume flat node_modules.

Verdict: NPM for legacy, PNPM/Yarn for modern apps.

Migration Paths

Thinking of switching? Here’s how tough (or easy) it is:

• From NPM to Yarn:

npm install --global yarn
yarn install

• From NPM to PNPM:

npm install -g pnpm
pnpm install

• PNPM automatically converts your lockfile and handles things smartly.

Tip: Use .npmrc or .yarnrc.yml to configure behavior globally and avoid surprises.

Real-World Use Cases

Let’s break it down based on common project types.

1. Solo Developer Projects

If you’re working alone on a side project or an MVP:

• Use Yarn or PNPM for faster install times.
• PNPM’s caching will save bandwidth if you’re on the go.

Winner: PNPM

2. Open Source Projects

You want easy contributions, minimal install issues.

• NPM is safe and familiar for all contributors.
• Avoid PnP or symlinks unless well-documented.

Winner: NPM (or Yarn v1)

3. Enterprise/Startup Teams

You care about CI times, reproducibility, and workspace management.

• PNPM is ideal here due to its monorepo support.
• Yarn is also great, especially with berry and PnP if your stack supports it.

Winner: PNPM (or Yarn)

4. Monorepo Architectures

If you’re using tools like TurboRepo, Nx, or Lerna:

• PNPM shines with its pnpm workspaces and pnpm recursive commands.
• Yarn supports it well too.

Winner: PNPM

Common Myths

Myth #1: “PNPM breaks everything”

Only legacy scripts that assume flat node_modules structure may break. Most modern frameworks (Next.js, Vite, etc.) work out of the box.

Myth #2: “Yarn is no longer maintained”

False. Yarn v3 (“Berry”) is actively maintained and includes tons of advanced features.

Myth #3: “NPM is slow and bad”

Since version 7+, NPM has massively improved in performance and stability. It’s a good default choice again.

TL;DR: Quick Summary

• NPM is the safe, familiar default — great for compatibility.
• Yarn offers speed and UX polish — especially in v1.
• PNPM is the most modern, efficient, and fastest — ideal for power users.

My personal take: PNPM is the future of JavaScript package management. It solves problems that used to plague large projects and continues to impress with every update.

Conclusion

Choosing a package manager isn’t just about install speed — it’s about long-term maintainability, developer experience, and project scale.

Each of NPM, Yarn, and PNPM has earned its place in the JavaScript ecosystem. But now that tools are maturing, PNPM is becoming the go-to choice for modern JavaScript apps — especially in monorepos or CI-heavy environments.

Still, if you’re building a simple app, or working in an environment where compatibility matters more than speed — NPM or Yarn is totally fine.

Remember: don’t pick based on hype. Pick based on your needs.

You may also like:

1. Top 10 Large Companies Using Node.js for Backend
2. Why 85% of Developers Use Express.js Wrongly
3. Top 10 Node.js Middleware for Efficient Coding
4. 5 Key Differences: Worker Threads vs Child Processes in Node.js
5. 5 Effective Caching Strategies for Node.js Applications
6. 5 Mongoose Performance Mistakes That Slow Your App
7. Building Your Own Mini Load Balancer in Node.js
8. 7 Tips for Serverless Node.js API Deployment
9. How to Host a Mongoose-Powered App on Fly.io
10. The Real Reason Node.js Is So Fast
11. 10 Must-Know Node.js Patterns for Application Growth
12. How to Deploy a Dockerized Node.js App on Google Cloud Run
13. Can Node.js Handle Millions of Users?
14. How to Deploy a Node.js App on Vercel
15. 6 Common Misconceptions About Node.js Event Loop
16. 7 Common Garbage Collection Issues in Node.js
17. How Do I Fix Performance Bottlenecks in Node.js?
18. What Are the Advantages of Serverless Node.js Solutions?
19. High-Traffic Node.js: Strategies for Success

Read more blogs from Here

Share your experiences in the comments, and let’s discuss how to tackle them!

Follow me on LinkedIn