LinkedIn respects your privacy

LinkedIn and 3rd parties use essential and non-essential cookies to provide, secure, analyze and improve our Services, and to show you relevant ads (including professional and job ads) on and off LinkedIn. Learn more in our Cookie Policy.

Select Accept to consent or Reject to decline non-essential cookies for this use. You can update your choices at any time in your settings.

Agree & Join LinkedIn

By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
LinkedIn
  • Top Content
  • People
  • Learning
  • Jobs
  • Games
Join now Sign in
  1. All
  2. Engineering
  3. Computer Science

Your team is struggling with code review frequency. How can you ease their overwhelm?

If your team is overwhelmed by constant code reviews, it's time to streamline the process. Consider these strategies:

- Establish clear guidelines on when and how often code reviews should occur to set expectations.

- Implement automated tools to handle preliminary checks, freeing up time for more complex issues.

- Schedule regular but reasonable intervals for reviews to prevent bottlenecks and reduce pressure.

How have you tackled code review challenges in your team? Curious to hear your strategies.

Computer Science Computer Science

Computer Science

+ Follow
  1. All
  2. Engineering
  3. Computer Science

Your team is struggling with code review frequency. How can you ease their overwhelm?

If your team is overwhelmed by constant code reviews, it's time to streamline the process. Consider these strategies:

- Establish clear guidelines on when and how often code reviews should occur to set expectations.

- Implement automated tools to handle preliminary checks, freeing up time for more complex issues.

- Schedule regular but reasonable intervals for reviews to prevent bottlenecks and reduce pressure.

How have you tackled code review challenges in your team? Curious to hear your strategies.

Add your perspective
Help others by sharing more (125 characters min.)
11 answers
  • Contributor profile photo
    Contributor profile photo
    Jatin Singh kanyal

    SDE@Amazon | MTech CSE IIT Madras

    • Report contribution

    1. Establish clear coding standards for your team. This reduces minor issues during reviews, allowing everyone to focus on more critical aspects. 2. Leverage Standups for Support: If you’re overwhelmed, speak up during standups. Request help from teammates to share the code review workload. 3. Split Code Reviews: Break down large changes into smaller, incremental code reviews. Smaller CRs are easier to review and typically require fewer iterations to finalize. 4. Include at least two reviewers. This ensures diverse perspectives and minimizes the chance of missing important details. 5. Automate Where Possible: Utilize AI-driven review tools or lint checks to address general concerns.

    Like
    11
  • Contributor profile photo
    Contributor profile photo
    SHIVANGI SINGH

    Customer Success Manager | SaaS & FinTech | SMB & Mid-Market | Onboarding & Retention | Cross-Sell/Upsell | Salesforce

    • Report contribution

    Streamline overwhelming code reviews by setting clear guidelines on review frequency and expectations. Use automated tools for preliminary checks, saving time for complex issues. Schedule reviews at regular, reasonable intervals to avoid bottlenecks and ease pressure, ensuring the process is efficient and supportive for the team’s productivity and morale.

    Like
    8
  • Contributor profile photo
    Contributor profile photo
    Gyanapriya Pradhan

    IT Software Developer | Technical @ NIXI GoI 🇮🇳 | EX-R&D 🔎 Intern NIT | Research Author ✍️ | Cited by foreign Universities Across USA, Europe, Asia

    • Report contribution

    Limit the scope of your review: To retain attention and effectiveness, study no more than 400 lines of code at once. Time management: Set aside time for code reviews, ideally no more than 60 minutes per session, to avoid tiredness and ensure quality. Automate trivial checks: Use automated technologies for preliminary checks to address small errors, allowing reviewers to focus on more difficult elements. Foster a good review culture by encouraging constructive criticism and open communication to make the process more collaborative and manageable. Balance the workload: Distribute review assignments fairly among team members to avoid bottlenecks and guarantee timely feedback.

    Like
    7
  • Contributor profile photo
    Contributor profile photo
    Nitin Repswal

    Former Unity Game Developer | AI & ML Enthusiast | Proficient in C/C++/C# | DSA-Focused | Web Dev

    • Report contribution

    To ease code review overwhelm, implement smaller, more frequent pull requests, establish clear review guidelines, allocate dedicated review time, and encourage peer reviews to distribute the workload.

    Like
    3
  • Contributor profile photo
    Contributor profile photo
    Yusuf Purna

    Chief Cyber Risk Officer at MTI | Advancing Cybersecurity and AI Through Constant Learning

    • Report contribution

    Based on my experience, overwhelming code review processes often stem from unclear priorities and inefficient workflows. To address this, I recommend embedding security-specific checks into your pipeline with tools like static application security testing (SAST) or code quality analyzers. These tools catch vulnerabilities early, reducing manual effort. Additionally, segment code reviews by risk. Critical paths (e.g., authentication, data handling) deserve deeper scrutiny, while less sensitive areas can follow lighter reviews. Finally, empower your team by assigning "review champions" to mentor and distribute the workload. Regularly re-evaluate your process to ensure it evolves with your team’s needs—continuous improvement is key.

    Like
    2
  • Contributor profile photo
    Contributor profile photo
    Saurabh ji

    Versatile Python coder,Data Analyst and frontend designer passionate about technology. Eager to learn and thrive in dynamic coding environments. Enthusiastic about staying up-to-date with the latest tech trends.

    (edited)
    • Report contribution

    Easing Code Review Overwhelm: Prioritize: Concentrate on reviewing critical areas and high-risk changes. Batch Reviews: Combine related changes to streamline review sessions. Timeboxing: Set a time limit for each review to avoid lengthy discussions. Feedback Culture: Foster an environment of constructive feedback, focusing on learning and improvement. By adopting these strategies, anyone can make the code review process more efficient and manageable for the team.

    Like
    1
  • Contributor profile photo
    Contributor profile photo
    Nihitha Reddy S

    Software Engineer | Java Full Stack & Frontend Developer | React.js, Spring Boot, AWS, DevOps | 4+ Years Building Scalable Web Apps

    • Report contribution

    Struggling with code review frequency? Reduce the burden by setting clear review expectations, limiting PR size, and automating checks. Encourage async reviews, rotate responsibilities, and celebrate small wins. A healthy review process boosts team productivity and code quality! #CodeReview #DevEfficiency

    Like
    1
  • Contributor profile photo
    Contributor profile photo
    Yusuf Purna

    Chief Cyber Risk Officer at MTI | Advancing Cybersecurity and AI Through Constant Learning

    • Report contribution

    Balancing code review frequency is crucial for maintaining both quality and productivity. I have found that setting review thresholds based on risk and complexity helps teams focus on critical changes while automating routine checks. Leveraging tools like static analysis and pre-commit hooks reduces manual effort, allowing developers to prioritize meaningful feedback. Establishing review rotations prevents burnout and ensures consistent engagement. A structured yet flexible approach fosters efficiency without sacrificing code integrity. Optimizing this balance enhances both team morale and development velocity.

    Like
    1
  • Contributor profile photo
    Contributor profile photo
    D RAHULSINGH

    Kaggle 1x Grandmaster & 2x Master | Former Google Cloud Ready Facilitator | Hackathon Winner & Judge | Python | SQL | Multi-Cloud - AWS, GCP, Azure | AI | Git | Linux | Open Source Contributor

    • Report contribution

    - Implement a clear code review schedule. - Limit the number of lines per review. - Encourage pair programming. - Use automated code review tools. - Prioritize critical reviews. - Provide training on efficient review techniques. - Foster a culture of constructive feedback. - Rotate review responsibilities among team members.

    Like
  • Contributor profile photo
    Contributor profile photo
    kundan kumar Yadav
    • Report contribution

    Introduce automated code review tools to handle routine checks, allowing the team to focus on critical logic and design aspects. Pair this with shorter, more frequent reviews to reduce workload.

    Like
View more answers
Computer Science Computer Science

Computer Science

+ Follow

Rate this article

We created this article with the help of AI. What do you think of it?
It’s great It’s not so great

Thanks for your feedback

Your feedback is private. Like or react to bring the conversation to your network.

Tell us more

Report this article

More articles on Computer Science

No more previous content
  • How would you explain complex algorithms to a non-technical project manager in Computer Science?

    67 contributions

  • You're facing resource constraints in a technical crisis. How do you prioritize critical tasks effectively?

  • How would you handle a stakeholder pushing for additional features beyond the agreed-upon scope?

  • Your remote team is growing rapidly. How do you maintain coding standards and practices?

  • Your team is clashing over innovation versus stability. How do you strike the right balance?

No more next content
See all

More relevant reading

  • Programming
    You're facing a tricky code review with a colleague. How do you offer constructive criticism effectively?
  • Programming
    How do you address conflicting feedback from multiple team members during a code review?
  • Computer Science
    You're in a code review session with a colleague. How do you offer constructive criticism effectively?
  • Software Development
    You're faced with a project crunch. How can you maintain top-notch code quality?

Explore Other Skills

  • Programming
  • Web Development
  • Agile Methodologies
  • Machine Learning
  • Software Development
  • Data Engineering
  • Data Analytics
  • Data Science
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI)
  • Cloud Computing

Are you sure you want to delete your contribution?

Are you sure you want to delete your reply?

  • LinkedIn © 2025
  • About
  • Accessibility
  • User Agreement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Copyright Policy
  • Brand Policy
  • Guest Controls
  • Community Guidelines
Like
3
11 Contributions