My latest piece in Forbes dives into how #highered is struggling to meet exploding demand for #online education—a complete 180 turn from just 20 years ago when the "50% rule" actually limited how much education could go digital. Based on new data from QM Quality Matters, Eduventures, and EDUCAUSE, three key findings emerged from their lastest research report CHLOE 10: 🎯 The Capacity Paradox: Public four-year institutions plan aggressive online expansion, but community colleges—serving our most vulnerable populations—can barely keep pace. Only 1 in 5 community colleges plan significant online growth despite serving students who need flexible education most. 🤖 AI Strategy Fragmentation: While 77% of online learning officers say #AI will be crucial within two years, nearly 10% of institutions have NO AI strategy. As Joshua Jones from QuantHub told me: "We're watching history repeat itself—institutions without coherent AI strategies aren't just falling behind, they're failing to prepare students for a fundamentally transformed workforce." 👩🏫 Faculty Development Stagnation: Only 28% of institutions report #faculty are fully prepared for online course design. Meanwhile, adjuncts teach 47% of online courses with minimal institutional support. The behavioral economics are fascinating too: Traditional undergrads increasingly choose digital courses despite preferring in-person learning. As Dr. Mark David Milliron from National University describes them, today's online learners are the "and-ers"—working adults, caregivers and veterans who need education to fit their lives, not the other way around. Dr. Bethany Simunich, PhD from QM Quality Matters notes: "Online learning has moved from the margins to the mainstream. The real story isn't just the demand; it's whether colleges can adapt fast enough to keep pace." Read my full piece: https://lnkd.in/gqyUPJ-d #HigherEducation #OnlineLearning #EdTech #DigitalTransformation #StudentSuccess #AI #CommunityColleges #FacultyDevelopment
The continued under-investment in faculty training and development is troubling. Teaching a great online course is very different from doing it in the f2f classroom, and professors who were forced online by the pandemic may have never really picked up the essential skills. A different approach to course development is needed too - it's unrealistic to expect individual profs (especially adjuncts) to build good online courses from scratch. Lots of work still to do here for many institutions.
Thanks for sharing these compelling insights.
You’re spot on. I also believe that beyond academics, online learners need meaningful support and engagement opportunities. Too often, they struggle with isolation or the sense that they’re missing out. In my experience, what they value most is connection to faculty, peers, and the institution. Creating that sense of belonging is where online learning can truly thrive.
Your community college information is particularly interesting, especially given these colleges' mission. These institutions serve first-generation students, working parents, and career changers who need flexible online options most. Unfortunately, this lack of online growth threatens to widen educational equity gaps. I hope community colleges can start expanding their online education soon.
Driving Change in Higher Ed Curriculum | EdUp Curriculum Podcast Host | CEO of EDCARTA
2wThis one got me!! Only 28% of institutions report #faculty are fully prepared for online course design. Meanwhile, adjuncts teach 47% of online courses with minimal institutional support. We just can’t make meaningful improvements for the student with backwards stats like that.