In today’s dynamic cyber landscape, organizations cannot afford to wait for vulnerabilities to be exploited. A robust vulnerability management strategy is essential—it enables the continuous identification, evaluation, and remediation of security weaknesses before they become critical threats. Bitdefender’s approach combines advanced scanners, automated patch deployment, and dynamic reporting that prioritizes risks based on severity, likelihood of exploitation, and business impact. This capability helps organizations stay compliant with industry standards while significantly reducing their attack surface. What sets Bitdefender apart is how its platform layers Risk Analytics with integrated Patch Management to deliver comprehensive visibility into vulnerabilities across both internal systems and external, internet-facing assets. Organizations gain the ability to proactively mitigate threats, make informed decisions, and streamline triage—all under a centralized, scalable solution. Let’s talk about how Bitdefender can elevate your vulnerability management. Whether you're seeking to tighten internal defenses, gain clarity across your external exposure, or accelerate compliance and remediation, Bitdefender offers the tools and insights to help. Read more: https://lnkd.in/dq8HFcXG
Andrei Rada’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Now Live- Cyber Assessment Framework v4.0 The NCSC has just released a major update to the Cyber Assessment Framework (CAF v4.0), reinforcing the UK’s commitment to cyber resilience across critical national infrastructure. As threats continue to evolve in scale and sophistication, this update provides organisations with clearer, more robust guidance to strengthen their cybersecurity posture. Key enhancements include: A deeper focus on understanding cyber threats and adversarial intent. New guidance for secure software development. Expanded coverage of AI-related cyber risks. Improved threat detection and response strategies. At RMT Technology, we’re here to help businesses navigate these changes and build stronger, more resilient systems. Whether you're looking to assess your current setup or prepare for compliance, we’re ready to support you. 📩 Get in touch to learn how we can help your organisation stay secure and ahead of the curve. 🔗 https://lnkd.in/eAaakRvh #CyberSecurity #NCSC #CyberResilience #RMTTechnology #ManagedServices #CyberEssentials #ThreatDetection
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Staying Safe Amid Today’s Zero-Day Vulnerabilities: Risk: 7.5/10 Today, several zero-day vulnerabilities have been reported across multiple platforms. While the technical details are being handled by vendors and security researchers, it’s crucial for both everyday users and cybersecurity professionals to stay vigilant. For the General Public: Keep your software, operating systems, and devices fully updated. Vendors often release emergency patches for zero-day issues. Be cautious with links, downloads, and attachments from unknown sources. Zero-day exploits can be delivered via phishing campaigns. Enable multi-factor authentication wherever possible to add an extra layer of security. Back up critical data regularly; this helps mitigate the impact if any system is compromised. For Cybersecurity Professionals: Review your organization’s systems for timely patching and ensure critical updates are deployed promptly. Monitor network activity and logs for unusual behavior that could indicate exploitation attempts. Conduct internal assessments of high-risk systems and endpoints to verify defenses against newly reported vulnerabilities. Educate your teams on awareness and response procedures to limit exposure. Remember: Zero-day vulnerabilities exploit previously unknown weaknesses, so maintaining proactive security practices is the best way to stay protected. Take care out there folks.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Most cyberattacks against critical infrastructure exploit vulnerabilities with a known patch. So why aren't more organizations patching faster? The bottleneck isn't technology, it's process. Our latest blog compiles the audience's top questions from our recent webinar with CS2AI Global - Control System Cyber Security Association International “Bridging Patch Management & Vulnerability Strategies for NERC CIP”. It's an honest look at the challenges organizations are grappling with: - Aligning asset inventories with compliance requirements - Managing legacy systems - Prioritizing vulnerabilities effectively The data confirms the problem: "70% of IT teams spend over 6 hours per week on security patching, yet only 23% are satisfied with their ability to fix vulnerabilities." That requires significant effort with minimal impact, which is precisely the topic we explore in the blog. The most valuable insights came from questions that challenged the status quo: 🔍 How do we prioritize vulnerabilities when the CVE database falls short? 🔍 What are the real-world strategies for legacy systems with no vendor support? 🔍 How do we bridge the gap between IT and OT to ensure a consistent security? 👉 Read the full Q&A to get the core insights from our experts: https://lnkd.in/eFFiUx7S
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
As always, Foxguard staying true to our mission of education and knowledge-sharing, we’ve compiled some of the most insightful questions from our recent webinar with @CS²AI and answered them in detail. Curious about what your peers are asking in the OT cyber security space? Check out this new blog for expert insights and practical takeaways: https://lnkd.in/ea2jYszC
Most cyberattacks against critical infrastructure exploit vulnerabilities with a known patch. So why aren't more organizations patching faster? The bottleneck isn't technology, it's process. Our latest blog compiles the audience's top questions from our recent webinar with CS2AI Global - Control System Cyber Security Association International “Bridging Patch Management & Vulnerability Strategies for NERC CIP”. It's an honest look at the challenges organizations are grappling with: - Aligning asset inventories with compliance requirements - Managing legacy systems - Prioritizing vulnerabilities effectively The data confirms the problem: "70% of IT teams spend over 6 hours per week on security patching, yet only 23% are satisfied with their ability to fix vulnerabilities." That requires significant effort with minimal impact, which is precisely the topic we explore in the blog. The most valuable insights came from questions that challenged the status quo: 🔍 How do we prioritize vulnerabilities when the CVE database falls short? 🔍 What are the real-world strategies for legacy systems with no vendor support? 🔍 How do we bridge the gap between IT and OT to ensure a consistent security? 👉 Read the full Q&A to get the core insights from our experts: https://lnkd.in/eFFiUx7S
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The stat in this post hits hard: 70% of IT teams spend over six hours a week on patching, yet only 23% feel good about the results. That's a huge effort for minimal impact! Foxguard’s Q&A digs into the reasons behind that disconnect and makes a critical point: if we’re patching just to check a box, we’re missing the bigger picture. The real value here is the mindset shift, moving from being compliant to being secure and how that often means challenging the status quo, especially when it comes to bridging the gap between IT and OT. The Q&A tackles the practical realities too: incomplete asset inventories, what to do when the CVE database falls short, managing risk when a system simply can’t be patched, and the challenge of prioritising when everything feels critical. This Q&A is one of the more honest takes I’ve seen on the challenges we’re all facing.
Most cyberattacks against critical infrastructure exploit vulnerabilities with a known patch. So why aren't more organizations patching faster? The bottleneck isn't technology, it's process. Our latest blog compiles the audience's top questions from our recent webinar with CS2AI Global - Control System Cyber Security Association International “Bridging Patch Management & Vulnerability Strategies for NERC CIP”. It's an honest look at the challenges organizations are grappling with: - Aligning asset inventories with compliance requirements - Managing legacy systems - Prioritizing vulnerabilities effectively The data confirms the problem: "70% of IT teams spend over 6 hours per week on security patching, yet only 23% are satisfied with their ability to fix vulnerabilities." That requires significant effort with minimal impact, which is precisely the topic we explore in the blog. The most valuable insights came from questions that challenged the status quo: 🔍 How do we prioritize vulnerabilities when the CVE database falls short? 🔍 What are the real-world strategies for legacy systems with no vendor support? 🔍 How do we bridge the gap between IT and OT to ensure a consistent security? 👉 Read the full Q&A to get the core insights from our experts: https://lnkd.in/eFFiUx7S
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Is your secrets management solution as secure as you think? The recent discovery of 14 vulnerabilities—collectively termed “Vault Fault”—in a leading secrets management platform should be a wake-up call for all organizations. While vault solutions have long been considered the gold standard for safeguarding credentials and secrets, these flaws highlight how even our most trusted technologies can harbor hidden risks. If attackers are able to exploit these weaknesses, the consequences for compliance, data privacy, and business operations could be catastrophic. This is a powerful reminder: security is never static. Every tool and process must be continuously evaluated against emerging threats. Regular risk assessments, layered defense strategies, and automated monitoring can make the difference between resilience and regret. Are you confident that your own vaulting solutions are up to date—and that your team can respond swiftly when new vulnerabilities come to light? Let’s keep raising the bar in cybersecurity together. How often do you review critical security infrastructure for newly discovered flaws?
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Looking to validate security controls and test ransomware resilience? Continuous security posture validation is the systematic and ongoing assessment of an organisation’s security controls to ensure resilience against cyber threats. Unlike traditional security evaluations that offer “point-in-time snapshots” (e.g., quarterly or annual reports), this approach involves constant testing and verification of defensive capabilities against realistic threat scenarios.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Good IT Security Isn’t One Product. It’s a Wall of Protection. Each row in a brick wall represents an essential layer of defense: Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery Next-Gen Antivirus Multi-Factor Authentication Security Awareness Training Email Threat Detection & Filtering Why layers? Because no tool alone is perfect. The goal of modern cybersecurity is not perfection—it’s risk mitigation. By combining layered strategies, businesses reduce vulnerabilities and respond more effectively to threats. If you’re still thinking in terms of “set-it-and-forget-it” security, it’s time for a mindset shift. Let’s talk about building your wall—stronger, smarter, and more resilient. #CyberSecurity #BusinessContinuity #MFA #LayeredSecurity #ITStrategy #RiskManagement #BCDR #LinkedInForBusiness #CyberResilience
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🚨 Critical Flaws Found in Zero Trust Products – What You Need to Know! 🚨 A recent report highlights multiple critical vulnerabilities in zero-trust security products, raising concerns for organizations relying on these solutions. Here’s a breakdown of the key takeaways: 🔹 Multiple Vendors Affected – Flaws were discovered in several zero-trust products, potentially exposing networks to attacks. 🔹 Privilege Escalation & RCE Risks – Some vulnerabilities allow attackers to gain elevated access or execute remote code. 🔹 Patch Availability – Vendors have released fixes, but delayed updates could leave systems exposed. 🔹 Zero Trust ≠ Zero Risk – Even advanced security frameworks can have weaknesses, emphasizing the need for continuous monitoring. 🔹 Mitigation Steps – Organizations should apply patches immediately, conduct security audits, and monitor for unusual activity. 💡 Thought to Ponder: With zero-trust adoption growing, how can businesses balance rapid deployment with thorough security testing? #Cybersecurity #ZeroTrust #VulnerabilityManagement #InfoSec #PatchManagement #CyberRisk Link:https://lnkd.in/dz4n5Rnf #cybersecurity #infosec
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🚨 What’s your biggest blind spot in supply chain cyber security for 2025? 🚨 Our analysis reveals the top 10 overlooked cyber risks that business leaders cannot afford to ignore — from open-source software threats to supplier concentration and foreign jurisdiction hazards. 🔎 Learn how hidden dependencies can spark systemic disruption across entire sectors and why traditional risk models aren’t enough anymore. 👉 Are you prepared for the risks lurking beyond your own perimeter? https://hubs.ly/Q03CKTCT0
To view or add a comment, sign in