Testing AI prototyping tools at Saltmine: the good, the bad, and the future

View profile for Anshul Saiwal

Product @ Saltmine | Ex–Ayu Health, Quikr, Shadowfax | Healthtech, Fintech, Marketplaces, CRE Tech

Over the last few months at Saltmine, we’ve been testing out a bunch of AI-powered prototyping tools: Replit, Figmamake, Builder.io, Lovable The first impression is honestly magical. You type in what you want, and suddenly you have a working screen, sometimes even a full flow, in minutes. For early experiments, that speed is gold. But the moment you try to go beyond the basics, the cracks show up:  • Prompts that work one time but completely fail the next.  • Hidden bugs that creep in early and only reveal themselves when  you make a small tweak.  • Hours lost in fixing and undoing fixes, instead of moving forward.  • Credit burn without real features shipping. What we have learned:  •These tools are fantastic for quick landing pages, testing an idea, or putting a demo in front of users.  • But if you want to scale into something more robust, you still end up stitching, patching, and hand-editing code the old way. At Saltmine, shifting from a PRD-first culture to a prototype-first saved us countless hours, engineers could react to something tangible, we killed bad ideas faster, and collaboration was smoother. But the current generation of AI tools isn’t ready to carry that baton all the way. Not yet. I don’t see this as a failure though. The gap between demo magic and production-ready is exactly where the next big opportunity lies. Curious, has anyone cracked a smooth end-to-end workflow with these AI tools? Or are you running into the same walls? Alay Shah Ajeya Mansabdar Shivam Gupta Anuradha Vasudeva #ProductManagement #Prototyping #AI #SaaS

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories