Value Engineering vs Value Vandalism: A Cost Estimator's Dilemma

Value Engineering or Value Vandalism? We’ve all been there. “Let’s cut 20 % — but keep the full scope.” Value Engineering is meant to be smart: optimising design, reducing waste, and delivering the same function for less. But too often it becomes value vandalism — cutting corners and critical elements, dressed up as savings. The result? A project that looks cheaper on paper but costs more in rework, risk, and reputation. The question isn’t whether we can cut, but what we are really cutting — cost or future performance? How do you protect real value when the pressure to “save now” is strongest? #ConfessionsOfACostEstimator #ValueEngineering #ValueVandalism #FutureOfEstimating #ProjectControls #CutCostOrCutQuality

  • No alternative text description for this image
Andrew Langridge

Supporting the delivery of digital project controls through innovative, data-driven solutions that enhance performance, efficiency, and sustainability.

2h

Confessions of a Cost Estimator, interesting. We need to be careful to consider the difference between asking us estimators to reduce the estimate with out grounds and a pricing exercise to try and position the organisation using price to win. In the cost estimating phase I would advise the keeping a decision diary as part of basis of estimate, defend what you believe to be correct. As for pricing as long as it’s understood that the price and cost are not related then the company can position itself anyway it wants, as long as the project still gets the full estimate value. What do you think?

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories