Choosing Between CBCT and Residual CTs for Earth Fault Protection

View profile for Eng Mohamed Kamel El Elsify

Lead Electrical Engineer at Kuwait National Petroleum Company

When to use Core Balance Current Transformer (CBCT) vs residual (summation) CTs for Earth Fault Protection : Core Balance CT (CBCT / Zero-Sequence CT) • Measures the true residual (I0 = Ia+Ib+Ic) by enclosing all live conductors (and neutral if present) through one core. • Immune to CT mismatch and unequal saturation of individual phase CTs. • Best for sensitive earth-fault (SEF) elements with very low pickup (typically <5–10% of CT secondary rating, e.g., <5 A on 5 A CTs). • Strongly recommended for: • MV/LV feeder SEF (50N/51N with low pickup). • Motor/cable feeders with small charging/unbalance currents. • LV earth-leakage/ground-fault relays (ZCTs in MCCs/switchboards). • Directional earth-fault protection in compensated or resistance-earthed networks. • Simple, accurate, and avoids “spill current” nuisance trips. Residual / Summation of Phase CTs (Holmgreen Connection) • Obtains zero-sequence current by adding the three phase CT secondary outputs (either wired or in relay software). • Economical: re-uses existing CTs, no extra CBCT required. • Acceptable for non-sensitive earth-fault elements with moderate pickup (≥10–20% of CT secondary rating). • Adequate for feeder or transformer earth-fault time-overcurrent (51N/50N) where grading margins are generous. • Limitation: Sensitive to CT ratio error, unequal saturation, and wiring errors → may cause false or missed trips, especially at low fault current. • Needs identical CT ratios/classes and correct polarity wiring; CT-circuit supervision is recommended. Special Case: Restricted Earth Fault (REF / 64G) • High-impedance REF requires special class PX CTs with defined knee-point, excitation, resistance, and low leakage reactance. • CBCT or residual methods are not interchangeable here—the scheme dictates CT specs. • Low-impedance REF and zero-sequence differential schemes also require careful CT selection and relay supervision. Standards & Guidance • IEC 61869-2: CT performance classes (P, PR, PX) → defines requirements, not connection method. • IEC 60255-151 / IEEE C37.112: Accuracy and inverse-time earth-fault element performance → both CBCT and residual acceptable if accuracy maintained. • Utility & vendor guides: Consistently recommend CBCT for sensitive EF, residual only for non-sensitive applications. Strong Recommendation (Best Practice) • Use CBCT whenever high sensitivity or high dependability is required (SEF, LV leakage, compensated networks). • Use residual summation only where sensitivity is moderate and CTs are well matched (typical feeder/transformer 51N protection). • For REF/differential EF schemes, follow the scheme’s required class PX CT specs. ✅ In practice: CBCT = precise and reliable for sensitive protection; residual = economical but limited to non-sensitive use. International standards don’t prescribe one method but require CT and relay performance; the consensus is CBCT is strongly recommended wherever feasible.

Ose Ifeanyi Peps

Electrical Engineer|Power and Machines|Solar and Renewable energies| MNSE.MIAENG.MNIEEE. Electrical Maintenance Engr at Residue Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit(RFCC)@Dangote Petroleum Refinery.Energy Management enthusiast

3w

Thanks

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories