Pharma L&D isn’t failing from lack of effort, it’s failing from avoidable misfires. We’ve seen it too often: ➤ Training that’s technically solid, but emotionally disconnected. ➤ Programs launched for business milestones, not learner needs. ➤ Managers expected to reinforce behaviors they didn’t learn themselves. In high-stakes life sciences learning, intent doesn’t equal impact. That’s why we wrote this: “6 Common pitfalls of L&D in pharma and what to do instead.” 📘 Read the full article → https://lnkd.in/gUrV6BRe It’s a guide for L&D and brand/ commercial teams to design learning that actually sticks by staying grounded in what your people face every day. Here’s a preview: ✅ Design from the learner’s lived experience ✅ Prioritize timing and usability over exhaustive coverage ✅ Personalize by role, need, and stage, not a one-size-fits-all model ✅ Design modular, flexible learning ✅ Bring managers in as coaches ✅ Shift from activity metrics to outcome metrics Let’s build learning that’s timely, targeted, and transformative. Curious to know which pitfall your organization might be facing right now? Drop a comment below. #Metrix #PharmaTraining #NextGenLearning #TrainingAndDevelopment
