Lessons Learned from Managing a Complex Infrastructure Crossing Every project teaches you something, but some truly shape the way you manage forever. I recently delivered a complex infrastructure project involving a critical HDD crossing. It brought together multiple asset owners, strict technical compliance, overlapping legal processes, and a schedule where even one delay could ripple through the entire programme. Here are the lessons I took away, which I believe are just as valuable for large-scale solar: 1. Stakeholders first Defining responsibilities, escalation paths, and dependencies upfront avoids firefighting later. 2. Legal and technical go hand in hand Approvals are never just paperwork. They depend on compliance deliverables such as earthing studies and BS EN 50122-1 standards. 3. Define compliance early Agreeing on criteria early prevents rework and keeps expectations aligned. 4. Contract as a playbook Clear clauses resolve disputes quickly and maintain accountability. 5. Critical path visibility Ensuring everyone focuses on the true bottlenecks keeps delivery on track. 6. Transparent change control. An open and well-documented process protects both time and cost. 7. Communication as risk control Regular calls, trackers, and proactive updates build trust and alignment. Final Reflection This project was delivered in harsh conditions far from ideal, but it reinforced that success is not only about engineering. It is about managing interfaces: legal, technical, commercial, and stakeholder. Those same principles apply in any extreme environment, from snow-covered rural sites to remote desert locations.
Lessons from a complex HDD crossing project for solar management
More Relevant Posts
-
Engineering & Project Management | Capital Projects | FEL + PMI through People, Process & Technology lenses
🚨 FEL isn't for all projects It's specifically designed for capital projects with physical assets. FEL (Front-End Loading) was created to evaluate: ✅ Alternatives selection based on data ✅ Technical feasibility and design options ✅ Execution strategy and risk assessment FEL works for: → Manufacturing plants → Industrial facilities → Energy infrastructure → Process equipment Other project types need good planning, but that's traditional project management - not FEL. 👉 FEL is specifically for engineering projects that build or install physical assets. What type of capital projects have you worked on? #ProjectManagement #FEL #Engineering #CapitalProjects #Industrial
-
Planning & Civil Engineer | Project Coordination & Execution Excellence | Project Management | Infrastructure Development | Turning Blueprints into Realities | Szabist 25
Planning is not just about making schedules, it’s about shaping the future of a project before the first brick is laid. As a Planning Engineer, I have learned that clarity in planning means confidence in execution. From grid stations to infrastructure development, I strive to align time, cost, and resources to keep projects moving forward with precision and efficiency. Good planning does not just save time - it builds trust. #PlanningEngineer #ProjectManagement #CivilEngineering #PrimaveraP6 #Infrastructure
-
Before you break ground, do you really know what's below? Buried utilities are the invisible risks that can derail safety, blow budgets, and stall timelines. Gas lines. Water mains. Fiber optics. Hitting one isn't just an expensive inconvenience, it's a serious safety hazard. And it happens more often than you think. The solution? Move from assumption to certainty with targeted subsurface investigation. Here's how Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) + Electromagnetic (EM) Locating transform your project before a shovel hits the dirt: 🦺 𝐉𝐨𝐛 𝐒𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐒𝐚𝐟𝐞𝐭𝐲 + 𝐅𝐢𝐞𝐥𝐝 𝐂𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐲 Safety is always the number one priority. Accurately mapping buried electrical, gas, and communication lines creates a safer site for every trade, especially your excavation crews. 🧠 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐃𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧 + 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐭 𝐀𝐯𝐨𝐢𝐝𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 Why design around guesswork? Know what's underground before finalizing plans. This lets architects and engineers avoid conflicts and design smarter from day one. ⚡ 𝐒𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐝𝐮𝐥𝐞 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 + 𝐁𝐮𝐝𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐥 Utility strikes trigger stop-work orders, emergency repairs, and rework chaos. Proactive utility locating is one of the most effective ways to keep your project moving. 🚧 𝐈𝐭'𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐝𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐜𝐨𝐬𝐭 ➡️ 𝐢𝐭'𝐬 𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐤 𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭. The projects that win don't just avoid problems. They plan around reality. Know what's underground. Build with confidence.
-
-
Civil Engineer, PE, MEng (Construction Law), Dy Director at DHA-C, Contract Specialist (FIDIC, ADR, Claims, PEC) Construction Manager (Roads & Infrastructure) Projects.
A common mistake in projects: mixing up Variation and Scope Change. Variation = adjustments within the agreed scope, instructed by the client/engineer. Scope Change = when work goes beyond the contract boundaries, requiring a new commercial deal. Point: Execute variations, negotiate scope changes.
-
Energy and civil infrastructure projects are some of the most complex in the world 🌎 ... and that complexity shows up in the contracts. Dozens of counterparties, shifting risk, tight schedules, and high stakes if things slip. That’s why I love this story from Consag Engenharia's legal team. As volumes spiked and deadlines tightened, they embedded Ivo into their workflows to handle the repetitive clause checks—so humans could focus on judgment. What changed: 🚄 Faster early review cycles (no more bottlenecks before procurement mobilizes) ⏳ Time back for real strategy and negotiation ⚖️ Consistent, scalable reviews across the whole team and every project As Assistant General Counsel Débora Lunardelli put it: “Ivo didn’t just fit our process—it learned how we think.” For construction and infrastructure orgs, this isn’t a “nice to have.” It’s how you de-risk projects before site work begins: surface issues earlier, standardize playbooks across JV partners and subs, and keep momentum when every day of delay costs money. The net effect? Less swivel-chair review, more decisions that move the job forward. Read the full story in the comments—would love your take on where this could help your team next. 👇 #Construction #Infrastructure #Energy #Contracts #LegalOps #RiskManagement #IvoAI
-
New NSR permitting guidance from EPA today on the ever-moving target of "begin actual construction." Anyone who deals with CAA NSR permitting is familiar with the ambiguous "begin actual construction" standard and the see-sawing guidance across EPA administrations and state agencies. The federal rule defines that phrase as starting permanent, on-site work “on an emissions unit,” and even lists things like building supports, foundations, underground pipework, and permanent storage structures as examples. But historically many reviewers treated any substantial site work as off-limits until the NSR permit issued. This ambiguity is a major headache for industry (lost time, carrying costs, interpretation risks, etc.), and the Trump EPA continues to pull every lever it can to ease permitting requirements in support of the AI data center boom and the Administration's power generation and on-shoring manufacturing goals. In a press release this morning, EPA flagged a new guidance letter (link in comments) and previewed that a rulemaking to revise the definition of “begin actual construction” will follow. The guidance letter is to Maricopa County Air Quality Department regarding a planned semiconductor manufacturing plant. Specifically, EPA clarified that developers may proceed with non-emitting, early-works construction (e.g., core & shell, foundations not tied to an emissions unit) before an NSR construction permit—while it pursues a rulemaking to refine the “begin actual construction” definition. Hopefully EPA will move swiftly to revise the federal definition of “begin actual construction,” with states likely to harmonize through SIP updates after the federal rule lands.
-
⚠️ 3 risks that cause 25% of project delays — which one hits you most? Federal and infrastructure projects rarely fail in design. They slip because of everyday risks that nobody tracks until it’s too late. We broke down the top 3 in a quick carousel — swipe through and see which one feels most familiar. 📡 And if you’ve faced these risks on your projects, drop your experience in the comments. 👉 For more insights on federal contracting and construction delivery, follow us here: Aeris Ops #RiskManagement #ConstructionProjects #FederalContracts #Subcontractors #ProjectControls #InfrastructureDevelopment
-
Consulting Engineering: Protecting Our Infrastructure and Safety Uncover the world of Consulting Engineering! We explore underground utilities, developing innovative solutions to safeguard essential infrastructure in metropolitan areas. Learn how we protect assets like gas lines, ensuring safety for communities. Discover how we develop and engineer solutions to protect assets for the utility provider and the neighborhood. 📷Watch the full interview now before the next surprise costs you. 📷 https://lnkd.in/g9N3SsSa #ConsultingEngineering #EngineeringSolutions #UndergroundUtilities #Infrastructure #CivilEngineering #MetropolitanAreas #UtilityProtection #SafetyFirst #EngineeringDesign #Construction
-
🔄 𝗜𝘀 𝗜𝘁 𝗦𝗮𝗳𝗲 𝗧𝗼 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝗮 𝗦𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝗔𝗻𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗿? In M&E projects, anchor specifications sometimes change. Availability, price, or site conditions can all drive substitutions. But more contractors are recognising that what looks like a simple “like-for-like” swap can have bigger implications for safety and compliance. Here are a few points worth keeping in mind: 🔹 Appearance isn’t evidence – anchors with similar descriptions or dimensions don’t necessarily perform in the same way. 🔹 BS 8539 sets the standard – it outlines how anchor substitutions should be assessed to make sure the installation remains compliant. 🔹 Change management matters – recording changes and engaging the original specifier protects both the installation and your liability. The safest approach is to check that any alternative has been properly evaluated for the substrate, service loads, and environmental conditions before it’s installed. Changing specification isn’t off limits—it just needs the right process. Managed correctly, it keeps projects moving while ensuring traceability and confidence in the outcome. 🎥 In this short video, we explore why a structured approach makes all the difference—and how to apply it in practice. 💬 How do you approach specification changes on your projects?
-
Regulatory and Ethical Considerations: - Comply with engineering standards and regulations. - Ensure transparent financial management. - Manage risks and uphold accountability. Read the full guide: https://lnkd.in/eQYdnxfP
-
