NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence (CCDCOE)’s Post

Articles of War #CyCon2025 series continues with its final piece: Netta Goussac and Professor Rain Liivoja take on the critical issue of legal review of military AI capabilities — asking what safeguards are needed to ensure compliance with international law. Their analysis digs into the terms of review, accountability, and safeguards, raising the key question: does AI require a more tailored legal approach than traditional weapons systems? 🔗 https://lnkd.in/dFqyVTcm

The question is not whether AI will be used in conflict, it already is. The real issue is how to ensure responsibility and safeguards. Does AI require a more tailored legal framework than traditional weapons? Absolutely. La seguridad no puede ser ciega frente a la innovación, in our opinion

A timely and essential debate: AI in warfare is not only about capability but about compliance. Legal review must evolve as fast as the technology itself — accountability cannot be left behind. En SNKA lo tenemos claro: sovereignty and legality must always go hand in hand

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories