💭AI can talk like us. But it only works if we talk its way. That’s why most prompts fall flat — natural language is messy, AI needs structure. Enter JSON.🤖 The moment I started wrapping instructions in JSON (clear fields, rules, output format), things clicked. No hallucinations, no “umm what did you mean?” Just clean, structured answers ready to plug into workflows. Funny thing? That’s not just AI. Gen Z has slang. Bosses have buzzwords. Every system has its dictionary. Learn it — and suddenly, you’re understood. #AI #PromptEngineering #JSON #FutureOfWork #Communication #Leadership #Innovation #ArtificalIntelligence
How JSON helps AI understand our language.
More Relevant Posts
-
Today i learn the difference between a normal AI model and a Large Language Model A normal AI model is like a specialist: trained for one narrow task (detect spam, predict sales, etc.). A Large Language Model (LLM) is a generalist: trained on billions of parameters and massive text data, able to understand, generate, and adapt to many tasks just through prompts. 👉 Normal AI = focused, limited 👉 LLM = broad, flexible The future of AI is moving from specialized tools to general-purpose intelligence. 🚀 #AI #LLM #MachineLearning #FutureOfWork
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🚨 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐈'𝐬 𝐓𝐰𝐨 𝐂𝐥𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐬: 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐋𝐋𝐌 𝐂𝐚𝐧 𝐅𝐞𝐞𝐥 "𝐎𝐮𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐒𝐲𝐧𝐜" Ever presented an AI with a forward-looking article, only to have it dismissed as "speculative"? You're not imagining things. You're witnessing a fascinating challenge at the core of AI reasoning: the conflict of the "Two Clocks." 𝐂𝐥𝐨𝐜𝐤 1: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐊𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐥𝐞𝐝𝐠𝐞 𝐋𝐢𝐛𝐫𝐚𝐫𝐲. Large Language Models are trained on vast datasets from the past. Their "worldview" is effectively frozen at the time their training ended. This makes them incredibly knowledgeable, but also inherently dated. 𝐂𝐥𝐨𝐜𝐤 2: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥-𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐂𝐚𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐫. The same AI is also aware of the current date. It knows what day it is, but it has no lived experience or updated knowledge of the events between its training cut-off and today. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐰𝐞 𝐚𝐬𝐤 𝐚𝐧 𝐀𝐈 𝐭𝐨 𝐞𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐰, 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐝-𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧. 𝐈𝐭𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐟𝐚𝐜𝐭-𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐜𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐚 𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭 𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐥𝐝, 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐥𝐢𝐛𝐫𝐚𝐫𝐲. If there's a mismatch (e.g., an article analyzing the impact of a technology that wasn't released pre-training), the AI can default to caution, labeling the new insight as "speculation" rather than "analysis." 𝐈𝐭'𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚 𝐛𝐮𝐠; it's a fundamental challenge of reasoning. Humans constantly update their mental models and intuitively understand the difference between a news report, an opinion piece, and a strategic forecast. For AI, this is a sophisticated skill it's still learning. The next frontier for AI isn't just about knowing more information. It's about developing the wisdom to understand context, intent, and the nuanced ways we talk about the future. We're teaching the machine not just to read the calendar, but to truly understand what it means to look ahead. Have you run into this 'AI time lag' yourself? I'd be interested to hear your experiences in the comments. 👇 #ArtificialIntelligence #AI #LLM #MachineLearning #FutureOfTech #Gemini
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Ever notice how AI can sound smart… but sometimes it’s just confidently wrong? That’s because it talks without really knowing. Recently, I was learning more about language models and learned something called 𝗥𝗲𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗹-𝗔𝘂𝗴𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 (𝗥𝗔𝗚). Now imagine if it could pause, look things up, and then answer. That’s what Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) does, it adds 𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗿𝘆, 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗼 𝗔𝗜. The result? ✨ Fewer made-up answers ✨ More trust ✨ Real knowledge, not guesswork This shift isn’t just about AI -- it’s about building tools we can actually rely on. Because in the end, technology should help us work smarter, not just louder. #AI #RAG #FIASS #Pinecone #LLM #GPT #GEMINI
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Language models don’t only generate answers—they sometimes hallucinate. 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐀𝐈’𝐬 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐩𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐫, 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐮𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐮𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐞, dives deep into the statistical roots of these errors. Hallucinations happen when models are incentivized to guess rather than acknowledge uncertainty. Traditional evaluation methods prioritize accuracy alone, which unintentionally rewards confident but wrong answers. But the key insight is that hallucinations are 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞. Instead of guessing, models can be trained to abstain when they are uncertain. This shift aligns well with 𝑶𝒑𝒆𝒏𝑨𝑰’𝒔 𝒑𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒄𝒊𝒑𝒍𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒉𝒖𝒎𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒚: 𝒂𝒅𝒎𝒊𝒕𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒈 “𝑰 𝒅𝒐𝒏’𝒕 𝒌𝒏𝒐𝒘” 𝒊𝒔 𝒃𝒆𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒓 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒏 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒍𝒚 𝒈𝒊𝒗𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒘𝒓𝒐𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒏𝒔𝒘𝒆𝒓. The paper calls for a rethinking of evaluation frameworks—moving beyond accuracy-focused scoreboards to metrics that reward appropriate expressions of uncertainty. By changing how we measure success, we can encourage models that are more reliable, trustworthy, and ultimately safer. This is an important reminder for the broader AI community: 𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐮𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐚 𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐞, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐚𝐥𝐬𝐨 𝐚 𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐰𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐬. #genai #openai #llm #ds #ml #ai #generativeai
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The Art and Science of AI Summarization ⚛️ In today's fast-paced, information-saturated world, the ability to quickly grasp the key points of a long document is more valuable than ever. This is where AI summarization comes in, a technology that uses AI to condense large volumes of text, audio, or video into concise, digestible summaries. But how exactly does it work? Let's break down the two main methods: extractive and abstractive summarization. 🤖Extractive summarization acts like a laser-focused highlighter, pulling out the most important sentences verbatim. 🤖On the other hand, abstractive summarization uses the power of large language models to generate new, human-like summaries. The most advanced tools today combine both methods to give you the best of accuracy and readability. In a world drowning in data, AI summarization is your life raft. It's not just about consuming content faster; it's about staying ahead. #AI #AItools #Productivity #ContentCreation #Innovation #Summarization
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🚀 𝗔𝗜 𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗟𝗟𝗠𝘀 When we talk about AI today, most conversations stop at Large Language Models (LLMs). But the evolution of AI unfolds across four powerful stages: 1️⃣ RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) – LLMs enriched with external knowledge for current & context-aware answers. 2️⃣ Fine-Tuning – Domain-specific training baked into the model for specialized expertise. 3️⃣ Agents – LLMs that can think → act → observe, chaining tasks with tools & APIs. 4️⃣ Agentic AI – Multiple agents coordinated by a planner to solve complex, multi-step, real-world problems. 💡 From answering questions → executing tasks → orchestrating workflows → managing entire ecosystems, this is the AI maturity curve. 👉 Question for you: Which stage do you think will disrupt your industry the most in the next 12–18 months? #AI #LLM #GenAI #RAG #Agents #AgenticAI #FutureOfWork
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The most powerful thing AI said in 2025? ‘I don’t know.’ For years, large language models were notorious for hallucinations, confidently generating answers that sounded right but weren’t. Now we’re seeing something new: AI that pauses, evaluates, and chooses honesty over invention. A viral screenshot shows GPT-5 pausing for 34 seconds before replying: “Short answer: I don’t know — and I can’t reliably find out.” Elon Musk called it “impressive.” Why this matters: · Accuracy over speed → GPT-5 now sometimes refuses to guess when confidence is low. · Thinking Mode → OpenAI confirms a new reasoning mode for complex or uncertain questions. · Trust factor → A humble “I don’t know” beats a confident hallucination ... especially in business, law, or healthcare. What we don’t yet know: · How often GPT-5 will admit uncertainty in real-world use. · Whether that 34-second delay always signals deeper reasoning or just processing time. But one thing’s clear: This shift from bogus certainty to thoughtful honesty feels like real progress. It’s not just about accuracy. It’s about building trust. What do you think ... is “I don’t know” a weakness in AI or the beginning of true intelligence? #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #Trust #FutureOfWork #Innovation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
As a teacher, when a student asked a question that I didnt know the answer to. My response was "I dont know, let's find out" As an analyst, when a stakeholder asks a question that I don't know the answer to. My response is, "I don't know, let's find out" Building trust cannot be done without honesty. LLMs have suffered greatly due this missing feature
Director | Global Head of Knowledge Management & Learning Transformation | AI-Driven Enterprise Enablement
The most powerful thing AI said in 2025? ‘I don’t know.’ For years, large language models were notorious for hallucinations, confidently generating answers that sounded right but weren’t. Now we’re seeing something new: AI that pauses, evaluates, and chooses honesty over invention. A viral screenshot shows GPT-5 pausing for 34 seconds before replying: “Short answer: I don’t know — and I can’t reliably find out.” Elon Musk called it “impressive.” Why this matters: · Accuracy over speed → GPT-5 now sometimes refuses to guess when confidence is low. · Thinking Mode → OpenAI confirms a new reasoning mode for complex or uncertain questions. · Trust factor → A humble “I don’t know” beats a confident hallucination ... especially in business, law, or healthcare. What we don’t yet know: · How often GPT-5 will admit uncertainty in real-world use. · Whether that 34-second delay always signals deeper reasoning or just processing time. But one thing’s clear: This shift from bogus certainty to thoughtful honesty feels like real progress. It’s not just about accuracy. It’s about building trust. What do you think ... is “I don’t know” a weakness in AI or the beginning of true intelligence? #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #Trust #FutureOfWork #Innovation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Master the art of getting the best from AI 🤖 Prompt engineering is the key skill for crafting effective inputs that yield high-quality outputs from large language models. Here is how to write powerful prompts: 🧠 Be specific and provide context: Vague requests get vague results. Give clear, detailed instructions and background information to guide the AI. 🎭 Define a Persona: Tell the AI what role to play (e.g., "Act as a senior marketing director") to align its tone and expertise with your needs. 📋 Specify the Format: Do you need a bulleted list, a table, or a paragraph? Defining the structure ensures you get a usable response. 🚧 Set Constraints: Give boundaries like word count, tone, or what to avoid to keep the output focused and on-brand. 💡 Pro Tip: Use few-shot prompting by providing examples of the desired style or format. This is incredibly effective for consistent results. Remember, prompt crafting is iterative. Refine and build upon your prompts to unlock the full potential of generative AI. #PromptEngineering #AI #GenerativeAI #TechSkills #Innovation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚀 Workflows vs Agents: How to Choose for Your LLM Solutions When building AI systems with large language models, one of the biggest decisions is: 👉 Should you use a workflow or an agent? Here’s a simple way to think about it (inspired by Anthropic’s excellent guide) 🔹 Workflows → Best for predictable, repetitive, structured tasks. Example: Auto-replying to customer emails with a standard message. ✅ Consistent, low-latency, cost-efficient. 🔹 Agents → Best for open-ended, dynamic, exploratory tasks. Example: Researching and summarizing the latest market trends. ✅ Adaptive, flexible, capable of multi-step reasoning. ⚠️ But higher latency and cost. 💡 Rule of thumb: If you know the exact path → Workflow. If the path is uncertain → Agent. Start simple. Often, a single LLM call + retrieval works better than overengineering an agent. Frameworks (LangGraph, Rivet, etc.) are helpful—but only after you understand the basics. ✨ Credit: Anthropic’s blog “Building Effective Agents” for the insights that inspired this post. #AI #LLM #Workflows #Agents #Anthropic #ArtificialIntelligence
To view or add a comment, sign in
-