Are We Racing Into AI’s Future on the Wrong Track? This photo is from a recent visit to the Eternal office - maybe some of us are paranoid.. but how else do we make paradigm shifts? The AI industry is speeding ahead at warp speed - but are we even heading in the right direction? While most of the conversation revolves around training data, GPU wars, and inference costs, the real threat lies beneath: today’s large language models (LLMs) are being built on design principles that prioritize conversation over cognition. The result? Models that sound convincing, but can subtly reinforce falsehoods through a phenomenon we call epistemic drift - mistaking coherence for truth. LLMs are great at predicting the next word and satisfying users in conversation. But they lack the cognitive tools we humans use to evaluate facts, question assumptions, or flag uncertainty. Without this, LLMs can get caught in self-validating loops - especially in multi-agent setups, where outputs feed back in as unverified inputs. Truth becomes a casualty of scale. This isn't just a technical problem; it's a philosophical one. Are we optimizing for helpful chatbots or for reliable knowledge partners? Are we building tools that mirror our biases, or systems that challenge and refine them? As we enter the next phase of AI, one marked by increasing autonomy and interaction - we need to rethink the core architecture. Conversational satisfaction is no longer enough. Epistemic integrity must be the foundation. The real question: if we’re flying 10 meters off course today, will we end up 100 kilometers off by the time we land?
Rethinking AI's Future: A Conversation on Epistemic Integrity
More Relevant Posts
-
What if you could watch an AI model’s thinking break down and stop it mid collapse? I’ve been rethinking how Large Language Models actually reason. Most people focus on embeddings, attention heads, or agent frameworks. Useful, but they don’t really explain why reasoning sometimes works beautifully… and other times implodes. Here’s a different lens: Latent Cognitive Fields (LCFs) ,dynamic spaces where ideas, reasoning paths, and contradictions interact. Not a new reasoning method, but a diagnostic way to understand what’s happening inside. Think of it like this: 1)Stable reasoning = a coherent field 2)Hallucinations = turbulence in the field 3)Multi-agent systems = overlapping fields influencing each other 4)Memory = snapshots of field states, not just token lists 5)Explainability = tracing field evolution instead of only attention weights Why this matters: 1)Spot reasoning collapse as it begins. 2)Detect hallucinations by tracking field stability. 3)Build collaborative AI through shared fields, not just message-passing. 4)Train models to reinforce stable fields and dampen unstable ones. This is early thinking, but reframing latent spaces, emergent behaviour, and physics-inspired modeling this way could give us a whole new diagnostic tool for AI reasoning quality. Imagine seeing a model about to lose coherence and nudging it back on track in real time.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🚀 RAG: The Secret Sauce Behind Smarter AI We all love what Large Language Models can do — but let’s be honest: sometimes they make stuff up (a.k.a hallucinations 🤯). Enter RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) — the game-changer in AI engineering. ✨ Instead of relying only on what the model “remembers,” RAG gives it a live knowledge boost: 1️⃣ Retrieve → Pull the most relevant documents/data from a knowledge base. 2️⃣ Augment → Feed that context into the LLM. 3️⃣ Generate → Get accurate, up-to-date, and context-aware answers. 🔑 Why it’s powerful: No more outdated model knowledge. Answers backed by facts, not guesses. Perfect for real-world apps like chat-with-docs, enterprise knowledge assistants, and domain-specific AI agents. If LLMs are the brain 🧠, then RAG is the library card 📖 that keeps them smart and trustworthy. 👉 Curious to see RAG in action? Imagine asking your AI assistant about your company’s latest policies, and it replies with exact sections from your internal docs — that’s RAG at work.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The AI Revolution Needs a New Paradigm: Beyond LLMs, Towards Causal & Auditable Intelligence One of AI’s founding fathers, Yann LeCun (Yann LeCun) says we won't reach AGI by scaling LLMs alone. And he’s right. Why? Because real-world intelligence can't emerge just by crunching quadrillions of words—it demands causal understanding, vision, planning, and the ability to explain itself. LeCun’s challenge goes far beyond “more data.” He urges us to build “World Models”—AIs that perceive, reason, and act like humans. This vision is at the heart of my new book, where I argue for a bold, post-LLM era: - Agents that move beyond pattern-matching to deep, compositional reasoning. - Systems that are auditable, transparent, and aligned with human values. - Adaptive governance for a future where AI collaborates responsibly, not blindly automates. The next leap isn’t about building bigger chatbots. It’s about crafting causal, trustworthy, and hybrid AI - where language meets sensors, where algorithms learn from the world, not just the web, and where transparency and ethical alignment aren’t optional, but foundational. Are you still betting everything on LLMs? The future belongs to those who build at the intersection of vision, reasoning, and robust governance. Let’s shape the next chapter: ethical, explainable, and truly intelligent AI. #AI #CausalAI #AuditableAgents #AIforGood #WorldModels #HumanCentricAI My New book: https://a.co/d/29LOgZf
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Major terms we hear everyday- But what are they? Token- Agent? In the realm of artificial intelligence, two crucial components play distinct roles: the Agent and the Token within a large language model (LLM) framework. 🤖 **Agent: The Decision-Maker** An Agent, an autonomous system powered by an LLM, excels in action and goal achievement. Unlike basic chatbots, it analyzes complex requests methodically. Key traits include: - Reasoning and Planning: Sequencing actions to achieve specific goals. - Tool Utilization: Interacting with external environments like web searches or database queries. - Memory Retention: Storing past interactions for contextual responses. - Autonomy: Operating independently for multi-step tasks. 🔑 **Token: Data's Fundamental Unit** Tokens, the core data blocks processed by an LLM, serve as the foundation for information handling. Key features encompass: - Basic Units: Tokens are indivisible text units crucial for LLM operations. - Numerical Mapping: Each token corresponds to a unique numerical value for model processing. - Billing and Performance Impact: Longer inputs with more tokens incur higher costs and processing time. - Context Window: LLMs have a token limit for input and output processing. In the AI landscape, Agents drive decision-making and goal attainment, while Tokens form the backbone of data processing within the intricate world of large language models. 🌐 #AI #Agent #Token #LLM #ArtificialIntelligence
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🔍 RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) is the hidden engine behind reliable LLMs One challenge with Large Language Models is hallucination—when models generate confident but inaccurate answers. This is where RAG pipelines shine. By combining an LLM with a vector search engine (like FAISS, Pinecone, or Chroma), RAG enables models to ground responses in real, contextual data. Instead of relying solely on pre-trained knowledge, the model retrieves relevant documents before generating an answer. From my recent projects, I’ve seen how powerful this is for: ✅ Building domain-specific chatbots ✅ Enhancing knowledge assistants ✅ Scaling semantic search across enterprise documents The result? More accurate, context-aware, and trustworthy AI applications. As Generative AI evolves, I believe RAG will continue to be a core design pattern for production-grade systems. 💡 Curious to hear: have you used RAG in your projects? What challenges or successes have you seen? govardhan03ra@gmail.com 6184711471 #AI #MachineLearning #GenerativeAI #LLMs #RAG #MLOps
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Are LLM advancements slowing? When GPT-5 didn't initially blow everyone's mind the narrative quickly became "𝘈𝘐 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘶𝘪𝘯𝘨"... that LLM R&D is hitting a wall. We went from waiting 18 months for massive GPT breakthroughs to getting incremental improvements much more frequently. The conditioning of our expectations, however, is confusing reality. Lenny Rachitsky recently interviewed Benjamin Mann (Anthropic co-founder) on his pod and they touched on this perception (link in comments). GPT-3.5 to GPT-4 felt earth-shattering because we waited so long. Now we get GPT-4 Mini, use-case specific models, multimodal improvements, and fine-tuned variants dropping constantly. This is more mature product dev, not slower innovation velocity, and this is what you want if you’re building something real on top of these models. Think about it... would you rather: 1) wait a year for one massive update with wildly new capabilities? 𝗢𝗥 2) get steady, relatively predictable improvements you can build on? While the pace of AI research continues to accelerate, the market hasn't adjusted its expectations to more frequent release cycles, as we seem to expect massive, paradigm-shifting advancements every quarter. Foundational models have already crossed the chasm, as the mainstream adopts AI, and the only thing changed is frequency of releases. The AI magic isn't gone, it's just getting incrementally more practical.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🌐 Here's a fascinating paradox: While 67% of enterprises are accelerating their AI investments, less than 20% report seeing significant ROI. The gap isn't in the technology—it's in our mental models. We're grafting AI onto old ways of working instead of reimagining our processes from the ground up. As Alan Turing once noted, "We can only see a short distance ahead, but we can see plenty there that needs to be done." If you'd like to know more, send me a DM. Note: I crafted this post to be concise yet thought-provoking, using a statistics-based hook followed by an insight that challenges conventional thinking, and closing with a relevant Turing quote. It follows all formatting requirements and maintains British spelling conventions (though none happened to be needed in this particular post).
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Everyone's waiting for the next AI breakthrough: call it GPT-6, AGI, or whatever. The model that finally "gets it." I have bad news. We’ve pretty much run out of data. That's why the pace of improvement has slowed, and it’s not going to change anytime soon. The reason GPT-3 and GPT-4 seemed so revolutionary was that they were trained on the whole internet. 30 years of accumulated text: Wikipedia, news, everything we ever wrote online. But now the data well has run dry (and that’s why GPT-5 is getting mixed reviews). Manual annotation and reinforcement learning can add a little more, but it’s just a tiny fraction of the whole internet. So don't expect much better models anytime soon. The real opportunity isn't waiting for better models. It's getting better at using what we have now. Using today’s models to solve real business problems in ways that deliver proven, quantifiable ROI. Today’s models are strong enough to deliver real impact across enterprises of all sizes, IF you deploy them correctly.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🔍 Small Language Models: The Future of Agentic AI? As the AI landscape evolves, the spotlight is shifting from massive, resource-hungry models to Small Language Models (SLMs) lean, efficient, and increasingly powerful. Why the pivot? Because agentic AI that can reason, plan, and act autonomously doesn’t always need billions of parameters. It needs contextual intelligence, modularity, and speed. SLMs are proving to be ideal for embedding into real-time systems, edge devices, and enterprise workflows where latency, cost, and control matter. SLMs are: ✅ Easier to fine-tune for domain-specific tasks ✅ More interpretable and auditable ✅ Better suited for privacy-preserving deployments ✅ Capable of running on local infrastructure or low-power environments In agentic architectures, SLMs can act as specialized cognitive units handling retrieval, reasoning, or decision-making while collaborating with other agents or tools. This composability unlocks a new paradigm: multi-agent ecosystems powered by lightweight intelligence. The future isn’t just about bigger models it’s about smarter orchestration. 💡 Imagine a team of SLMs working together: one fetching data, another interpreting it, and a third generating insights all in milliseconds. That’s not science fiction. That’s the emerging reality of agentic AI. Are we ready to embrace this shift? #AI #AgenticAI #SmallLanguageModels #SLM #LangChain #EdgeAI #EnterpriseAI #FutureOfWork #AIArchitecture #GenAI #MultiAgentSystems
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
One of the next frontiers hypothesized for AI isn't about bigger language models—it's about building "world models." My latest article, "AI Co-Creators and 'World Models'," explores what this shift would mean for how we work with AI. https://shorturl.at/OcilP Prompting a 'text-predictor' with text is the core of our interaction with AI today, but a world-model AI would change the paradigm: Instead of just generating language, it would understand the real world—how things move, how objects relate, and how actions have consequences. This potential shift would add a new dimension to the "new literacy" from my previous post [https://shorturl.at/UExPZ]. Here’s are some of the key elements (read the article for fuller detail): 🧠 From text to multi-modal input (already underway). Current AI user: "Generate a 3D model of a chair." AI Co-Creator: Provides a sketch, a text description, and a physics simulation to define how the chair must function. 🧠 From trial-and-error to simulation. Current AI user: A robot uses reinforcement learning, bumping into shelves to learn a path. AI Co-Creator: An AI with a world model simulates millions of "what if" scenarios in its head to find the most efficient path before it even moves. This is about moving beyond language to a deeper, more grounded form of intelligence. Read the full article to understand the changes proposed and what they would mean for the future of human-AI collaboration: https://shorturl.at/OcilP #artificialintelligence #worldmodels #newliteracy #technology
To view or add a comment, sign in