𝐃𝐚𝐭𝐚 𝐀𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐥𝐮𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐃𝐚𝐭𝐚 𝐄𝐧𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐫𝐬 Data architecture isn’t just documentation — it’s the foundation on which efficient, reliable, secure, and cost-effective data systems are built. Think of it this way: ➊ 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐚𝐭𝐚 𝐀𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭 creates the blueprint. ➋ 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐚𝐭𝐚 𝐄𝐧𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐫 builds the system following that blueprint. Both roles work hand in hand to ensure the data system meets business needs. ⸻ 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐃𝐚𝐭𝐚 𝐀𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐌𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬 A well-designed data architecture brings clarity and impact: ➊ Improves performance & scalability ➋ Ensures clean, accurate & consistent data ➌ Reduces data management costs ➍ Strengthens security & governance ⸻ 𝐊𝐞𝐲 𝐌𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐃𝐚𝐭𝐚 𝐄𝐧𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐫𝐬 • Data Sources – Relational DBs, NoSQL, data lakes, streaming sources • ETL/ELT Tools – Choosing the right frameworks & building efficient pipelines • Storage Patterns – Databases, warehouses, lakes & their trade-offs • End Users – Designing systems that actually serve decision-makers ⸻ 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥-𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝 𝐁𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐟𝐢𝐭𝐬 ✔️ Picking the right technology stack (RDBMS vs NoSQL vs Lakehouse) ✔️ Designing reliable & efficient data pipelines ✔️ Using normalized, intuitive data models for better performance ✔️ Implementing governance policies to stay compliant ⸻ 𝐂𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐀𝐬𝐤 • How will data from multiple sources be handled? • How do we ensure data accuracy and consistency? • What models & technologies should be used? • How will we pipeline, partition & distribute data? • Is caching & indexing necessary? • How do we secure and scale the system? By focusing on these areas, data engineers can design and maintain systems that truly drive business outcomes. Hope this helps fellow data professionals stay relevant and build smarter systems! #DataEngineering #Data #AI #DataArchitecture
Satya .’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Data Lake Architecture – A Data Engineer’s Perspective As data engineers, our job is to move, process, and optimize data pipelines so that raw data can be turned into meaningful insights. A well-designed Data Lake Architecture is at the heart of this. Here’s how we look at it: 🔹 Ingestion Tier – Building connectors and pipelines to handle real-time streams, micro-batches, and large batch jobs. Scalability and fault tolerance here are critical. 🔹 HDFS Storage Layer – The backbone for storing structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data. Think of it as the raw data zone. 🔹 Distillation & Processing Tiers – Where engineers design ETL/ELT workflows. Using in-memory engines, MPP databases, or MapReduce, we refine raw data into curated, queryable formats. 🔹 Insights Tier – The product of good engineering: enabling SQL/NoSQL interfaces so analysts, data scientists, and business teams can run queries at scale. 🔹 Unified Operations Tier – The often underrated piece: system monitoring, policy enforcement, data governance (MDM/RDM), and workflow orchestration ensuring the lake doesn’t turn into a swamp. From a data engineering lens, success means: ✔️ Seamless ingestion pipelines ✔️ Scalable storage & processing ✔️ Strong governance and monitoring ✔️ Enabling real-time, batch, and interactive insights downstream In short, we build the foundations that let organizations unlock the true power of data. As a data engineer: What tools are you using in your data lake pipelines today?
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Data Architecture Deep Dive: Mesh, Mart, Lake, and Lakehouse Selecting the right data architecture is critical for a successful data strategy. Here’s a streamlined look at the four major paradigms: 🔹 Data Mart – Domain-Specific Analytics Subset of a data warehouse focused on departments/functions. Optimized for predefined reporting and dashboards. Tech: Dimensional modeling, ETL, columnar storage, subject-oriented. Pros: Reliable, read-optimized, consistent. Cons: Upfront design needed, risk of silos. 🔹 Data Lake – Schema-on-Read Storage Centralized raw data repository supporting structured, semi/unstructured data. Tech: Object storage (S3/ADLS/GCS), ELT, batch + streaming, horizontal scaling. Pros: Flexible, cost-effective, ML/AI-friendly. Cons: Risk of “data swamp” without governance. 🔹 Lakehouse – Unified Analytics Blends lake flexibility with warehouse performance + governance. Tech: Delta/Iceberg/Hudi tables, ACID, SQL on lake, ML + BI integration, versioning. Pros: Reduces duplication, supports both analytics + operations. Cons: Needs modern frameworks, often vendor-specific. 🔹 Data Mesh – Distributed Ownership Cultural + technical shift where domain teams own “data as a product.” Core Principles: Domain ownership, self-serve infra, federated governance. Pros: Scales well in large orgs, reduces central bottlenecks. Cons: Requires maturity, strong platform engineering, cultural change. 📌 Decision Factors: Scale, governance needs, infra maturity, team structure, and use case diversity. 📈 Trend: Hybrid approaches—lakes with mart-like layers, lakehouses with mesh principles. What challenges is your organization facing in evolving its data architecture? #DataArchitecture #DataStrategy #DataEngineering #DataPlatform #DataManagement #DataGovernance #DataOps #CloudData #ModernDataStack #BigData #Analytics #BusinessIntelligence #DigitalTransformation #CloudComputing #EnterpriseData #DataDriven #AI #MachineLearning #MLOps #DataScience #DataWarehouse #DataLake #DataLakehouse #DataMesh #ETL #ELT #SQL #DataQuality #TechLeadership #Innovation #SentientAI
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Navigating the Evolving Landscape of Data Engineering! In the ever-expanding realm of data, the role of data engineering stands as a pivotal force. This field thrives on dynamism, requiring a keen eye on the latest trends to craft resilient, scalable, and efficient data solutions. Here are some trends currently in the spotlight: - Data Mesh Architecture: Shifting away from monolithic data lakes, Data Mesh advocates for decentralized data ownership, treating data as a product. This approach empowers domain teams, enhancing data quality and accessibility. - Real-time Data Processing & Streaming: The clamor for instant insights is on the rise. Technologies like Apache Kafka, Flink, and Spark Streaming have become indispensable for managing high-volume, low-latency data streams. - Data Observability: Similar to code, data pipelines necessitate monitoring for health, quality, and performance. Practices and tools for data observability play a vital role in ensuring trust and reliability in data assets. - ELT (Extract, Load, Transform) over ETL: With the ascendancy of potent cloud data warehouses such as Snowflake, BigQuery, and Redshift, the preference for loading raw data first and transforming it within the warehouse is gaining traction as a more flexible approach. - Data Governance & DataOps Automation: In the face of escalating data volumes, robust governance frameworks and the application of DataOps principles (aligning DevOps with data pipelines) are crucial for compliance, quality assurance, and streamlined operations. What trends are sparking excitement in your data engineering endeavors? Feel free to share your perspectives below! #DataEngineering #DataMesh #RealtimeData #DataObservability #ELT #DataGovernance #DataOps #BigData #CloudData #Analytics #TechTrends
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Nowadays, even Lakehouse platforms are AI-enabled — with AI assisting in data cataloging, modeling, governance, and more. What we truly need are experts in AI prompting to fully unlock this potential.
In Europe, a lot of companies are moving their Data infrastructure from traditional DataLakes / Data Warehouses for the Lakehouse Architecture ❌ The Problem with traditional Datalakes and Data Warehouses: - You end up with duplication everywhere. Raw data lives in the Datalake, cleaned data lives in the Data Warehouse, and teams are wasting time syncing and re-checking data. This creates inconsistencies, two copies of truth that rarely fully align. - On top of that, Data Warehouses are rigid. They need structured data, which is great for excel-like data but not ideal when dealing with semi-structured or unstructured data (images, videos, text etc), which is an issue for AI endeavors. - And the biggest pain point? In a warehouse, storage and compute are coupled. Need more storage? You’re forced to pay for extra compute. Need more compute? You’re paying for storage you don’t actually need. That tight coupling is why Data Warehouse bills explode the moment your data or workloads grow. That’s why the Lakehouse model emerged: unifying the flexibility of a Datalake with the performance of a Data Warehouse. Databricks popularized it with Delta Lake, but the principle works across platforms. ☑️ The 3 Layers (Medallion Architecture) - Bronze (Raw): raw ingested data, as-is from source systems. Nothing thrown away, full fidelity. - Silver (Clean): cleaned, standardized, and joined. This is where data becomes analytics-ready. - Gold (Curated): business-level aggregates and Data Marts. Optimized for dashboards, ML features, or executive reporting. ☑️ Why leaders are moving towards it - One copy of truth → no more lake + warehouse duplication - Lower cost → keep raw/clean layers in cheap storage, only optimize the curated layer - Flexibility for teams → data engineers manage data from Data Sources to Gold layer, analysts and ML engineers pull data from Gold layer - Faster business outcomes → shorter time from ingestion to insight, with fewer handoffs The Lakehouse is an architecture that reduces cost under the right circumstances. But still, it’s not a one size fits all. In my opinion, this type of Data Architecture is great for companies having Data Engineers very proficient with Python and Spark + Data Scientists often dealing with semi-structured or unstructured data. #DataEngineering #Lakehouse #Architecture #Analytics #Databricks #Cloud
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Day 53: Data Engineering Learning Journey Surrogate Keys in Data Warehousing 🔹 What is a Surrogate Key? An artificially generated key (usually numeric, e.g., Identity column in SQL). Not derived from business data. Acts as the primary key in dimension tables. 🔹 Why Not Natural Keys? Natural keys (like Employee_ID, SSN, Product_Code) are not always reliable because: Business rules change – IDs can be reused or reformatted. Performance issues – Natural keys may be long strings (e.g., email addresses). Data integration challenges – Same entity may have different keys across systems. Null or missing values – Not all systems guarantee uniqueness. 🔹 Advantages of Surrogate Keys ✅ Stability – Keys don’t change even if business rules change. ✅ Performance – Numeric keys join faster than string-based natural keys. ✅ Simplifies ETL – Helps handle Slowly Changing Dimensions (SCD Type 2). ✅ Consistency – Uniform representation across different systems. ✅ Better Data Quality – Avoids issues with duplicates or inconsistent business keys. 🔹 Example: Natural Key (Customer_ID = CUST-101) If system A uses "CUST-101" and system B uses "101-CUST", conflicts arise. Surrogate Key (Customer_Key = 10001) A generated integer that is stable across all systems. 📌 Quick Takeaway Surrogate Keys act as a shield between changing business identifiers and your warehouse, ensuring data consistency, stability, and performance. To deepen your understanding of data analytics and data engineering, consider following Senthil Kumar #DataEngineering #BigData #CloudComputing #ETL #DataPipeline #DataEngineerLife #ApacheSpark #DeltaLake #DataLakehouse #SQL #PythonForData #DataOps #AnalyticsEngineering #DataCommunity #ModernDataStack #Azure #AWS #GCP #AzureSynapse #AmazonRedshift #BigQuery #DataEngineeringCommunity #SQLOnCloud #StreamingData #TechCareer
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Data Engineering & ETL Excellence 🚀 The Foundation of AI: Data Engineering & ETL Mastery Behind every successful AI system is a robust data engineering pipeline. Here's what makes the magic happen: 🔧 Data Engineering Excellence Data engineers are the architects of intelligence: Source Integration: Connecting diverse data sources (APIs, databases, streaming platforms, cloud storage) Pipeline Architecture: Building scalable, fault-tolerant systems that handle terabytes of data Data Quality Assurance: Implementing validation rules, anomaly detection, and consistency checks Real-time Processing: Creating streaming pipelines for instant data availability ⚡ ETL Pipeline Mastery The backbone of every data operation: Extract: Pull data from multiple heterogeneous sources Handle various formats (JSON, CSV, Parquet, XML) Manage API rate limits and connection pooling Implement incremental data extraction strategies Transform: Data cleansing and standardization Complex business logic implementation Data enrichment and feature creation Format conversions and schema mapping Load: Optimized data warehouse loading Batch and micro-batch processing Data partitioning strategies Backup and recovery mechanisms 🛠 Modern ETL Stack Orchestration: Apache Airflow, Prefect, Dagster Processing: Apache Spark, Pandas, Dask Storage: Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, Delta Lake Monitoring: DataDog, Prometheus, custom alerting systems 📈 The Business Impact Well-engineered ETL pipelines enable: 99.9% uptime for critical business processes Sub-second latency for real-time analytics Cost optimization through efficient resource utilization Data democratization across entire organizations Without solid data engineering, even the best AI models fail. The pipeline is the foundation that transforms raw chaos into structured intelligence. What's your biggest ETL challenge? Let's discuss solutions! 💬 #DataEngineering #ETL #DataPipelines #BigData #DataArchitecture #ApacheSpark #Airflow #DataWarehouse #DataOps #TechLeadership
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
From punch cards to lakehouses: the untold evolution of databases It's fascinating to think back on how far we've come: from the punch cards, through big monolithic systems, to today's vector databases and lakehouse architectures. Here's a quick sketch of that journey: 1. Punch cards, batch jobs, and basic data storage – constrained by hardware & speed. 2. Real-time operational systems, like airline reservation systems (Sabre, etc.), drove the need for transaction processing, reliability, and uptime. 3. Relational databases & SQL brought structure, standardisation, powerful query logic, and ACID properties—the workhorse of enterprise data. 4. Data warehouses / OLAP handled massive volumes of structured data for reporting, BI, and insights. 5. NoSQL & alternative models (document, key-value, graph) addressed unstructured or semi-structured data, scale, and flexibility. 6. Vector databases / embedding-based search emerged alongside AI/ML: similarity search, unstructured data, "fuzzy" queries, etc. 7. Lakehouses & unified data platforms are now trying to combine analytics, AI, governance, batch & streaming, structured & unstructured—all in one architecture. What's driven each leap? New demands (more data, more variety, more speed), changing hardware & storage costs, and shifting use-cases (AI, real-time). For organisations today: • Don't just pick technology for today's needs, think about where your data needs are heading (e.g. unstructured / embedding / real-time). • Understand trade-offs, every database model optimises some things (latency, consistency, cost) at the expense of others. • Invest in data architecture and governance early, because as your data variety & volume grow, those become significant burdens.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
To meet the rising demand for clean, trusted, and scalable analytics, a new role has emerged at the center of the modern data stack – the analytics engineer. Equal parts software engineer, data modeler, and business translator, the analytics engineer is becoming the structural core of data teams, taking ownership of a layer that was once neglected: the space between ingestion and insight. #AnalyticsEngineer #DataHeroes #InsightToAction #ModernDataStack #DataDrivenDecisions Read More- https://lnkd.in/g5KXyzRU
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Data Science teams waste the vast majority of their time trying to validate data versus building models. Data teams need to focus less on deployment infrastructure (more or less a solved problem) and more on the cost to understand and use the data that exists. This is challenging because it is not purely a 'data' problem: Data discovery has existed since the on-prem days, and it hasn't fundamentally changed much. You map analytical/transactional database queries together to understand how a particular metric was generated. This is NOT the hard part. What data scientists care about typically is not the exact query used to transform a dataset; it's an understanding of the source of that dataset. 1. Where did this data come from? 2. Who is the owner? 3. What does this data mean? 4. What was the context around when the data was created? 5. What is the business logic/rules applied to the data? 6. Is this data trustworthy or not? These questions cannot be answered by looking at the data itself, in the same way, looking at the output of some process does not tell you where it came from. The closest thing to a true data source is the application code that produces data via an event, API, or database write, OR the data pipeline code that is ingesting data from a 3rd party source and transforming it in some way. In both cases, examining the data itself has limited utility. If data is internal, the source code and corresponding git history tell you exactly when data was created, who created the code that produced it, all the business logic around how it was produced, and the context of the surrounding system and the way the data is used within that system. If the data is external, the data pipeline code tells you where the data is being ingested from, how frequently it is expected to be processed, any methods of enrichment, and transformations performed in upstream systems. These two elements taken together provide a tremendous amount of information around what data actually IS and how it can be used, without ever needing to examine the contents of the downstream system. Today, these elements are totally missing in modern data catalogs, meaning you have less than half the data explainability story and your catalogs will often go unused by scientists and analysts. Good luck!
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
💡 Data leaders like Chad Sanderson are right Most data teams spend more time validating data than creating real business value. 📉 🚀 The challenge isn’t about infrastructure anymore. ✅ It’s about trust. 📊 Imagine your finance team finds two reports with different revenue numbers. The question is not just “which number is right?” It’s “where did this data come from, who owns it, and can I trust it?” 🔍 Without context - like when the data was created, why it was created, and what rules were applied - data scientists are left in the dark. 📉 That’s why so many data catalogs sit unused. 🏢 Enterprises can’t afford this uncertainty. 💰 Decisions worth millions are being made on shaky ground. ✨ If you want your teams to move faster, trust their data, and spend more time innovating, it’s time to rethink how you approach data reliability. 📘 We put together a guide to help enterprises get this right 👉 : 🔗 https://lnkd.in/g-3mphkx #Acceldata #DataReliability #EnterpriseData #DataTrust #DataQuality #DataManagement #DataObservability #AgenticAI #ADM #AgenticDataManagement #AI #DataInfrastructure
Data Science teams waste the vast majority of their time trying to validate data versus building models. Data teams need to focus less on deployment infrastructure (more or less a solved problem) and more on the cost to understand and use the data that exists. This is challenging because it is not purely a 'data' problem: Data discovery has existed since the on-prem days, and it hasn't fundamentally changed much. You map analytical/transactional database queries together to understand how a particular metric was generated. This is NOT the hard part. What data scientists care about typically is not the exact query used to transform a dataset; it's an understanding of the source of that dataset. 1. Where did this data come from? 2. Who is the owner? 3. What does this data mean? 4. What was the context around when the data was created? 5. What is the business logic/rules applied to the data? 6. Is this data trustworthy or not? These questions cannot be answered by looking at the data itself, in the same way, looking at the output of some process does not tell you where it came from. The closest thing to a true data source is the application code that produces data via an event, API, or database write, OR the data pipeline code that is ingesting data from a 3rd party source and transforming it in some way. In both cases, examining the data itself has limited utility. If data is internal, the source code and corresponding git history tell you exactly when data was created, who created the code that produced it, all the business logic around how it was produced, and the context of the surrounding system and the way the data is used within that system. If the data is external, the data pipeline code tells you where the data is being ingested from, how frequently it is expected to be processed, any methods of enrichment, and transformations performed in upstream systems. These two elements taken together provide a tremendous amount of information around what data actually IS and how it can be used, without ever needing to examine the contents of the downstream system. Today, these elements are totally missing in modern data catalogs, meaning you have less than half the data explainability story and your catalogs will often go unused by scientists and analysts. Good luck!
To view or add a comment, sign in