According to Anthropic's CEO, Claude is already writing 90% of the code. How long do you think AI can fully replace developers? Or never?
More Relevant Posts
-
Lately I am been following AI tools, and most of them feel like clever autocomplete. Helpful, but still… autocomplete. GPT-5 Codex looks different. • It doesn’t just suggest code, it can dive into a messy codebase, refactor for hours, and adapt its “brainpower” to the complexity of the task. • Wild code-review skills: spotting bugs and compatibility issues. • Performance: thanks to heavy caching and smarter infrastructure, big jobs finish dramatically faster. My opinion? This isn’t about replacing developers. It’s about changing what “developer time” means. If we let the AI handle the heavy lifting we free ourselves to focus on design, product thinking, and the creative parts that actually move the needle. Will every team adopt it tomorrow? Probably not. Trust, security, and culture take time. But the direction is clear: the day-to-day way of coding is changing, and GPT-5 Codex feels like a look in to that future. What’s your reaction? #SoftwareEngineering #Opinion #FutureOfWork #GPT5 #Codex #AI
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🤖 AI Won’t Replace Programmers — But… …programmers who know how to use AI will replace those who don’t. AI tools today: ✅ Generate code snippets in seconds ✅ Suggest bug fixes ✅ Automate documentation ✅ Speed up testing But here’s the secret: AI can’t replace critical thinking, architecture, and problem-solving. It’s a co-pilot, not the driver. 🚀 The future belongs to programmers who embrace AI as a partner, not a threat. 👉 Do you see AI as a tool, or as competition?For more insights and updates, you can follow me on: shoaibamin.com medium.com/@shoaibsivany x.com/theshoaibamin github.com/shoaibamin-dev
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🌍 Tech is changing faster than ever—with AI, vibe coding, and automation reshaping how we build. 🤔 What do you think will define the future: AI replacing code, or developers reinventing coding with AI?
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
#ProductivityHack: What truly makes code 'clean'? 🤔 Clean code isn’t just about following rules or writing short functions. It’s about reducing cognitive load for future developers and ensuring that the logic is easy to understand and maintain. ✔ Naming conventions matter, but only if they support the overall system logic. ✔ True clarity comes from understanding the domain and designing for maintainability. ✔ Code should communicate intent, not just meet technical requirements. AI tools can assist by: ✅ Testing reasoning flows ✅ Highlighting hidden complexities ✅ Refining design choices Making clarity a habit, not an afterthought. How do you approach clean code in your projects? Let’s discuss! 👇 #CleanCode #SoftwareDevelopment #CodingPractices #AI #TechLeadership #Productivity
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Unpopular opinion : 💻 Everyone’s asking: “Will AI replace developers?” Sure — right after vending machines replace chefs, or chatbots start writing breakup letters that don’t end with “As an AI language model, I can’t feel emotions…” AI is great at generating code, docs, even funny nonsense like this : https://ai-bliat.online/ But here’s the twist: AI still needs humans who know why they’re building, not just how. We’re not just typing semicolons — we’re debugging requirements, untangling edge cases, convincing designers that “impossible” button placement is actually… impossible. So no, AI won’t replace developers, It will make the code a bit more pixel perfect + It’ll just automate the boring parts — leaving us more time to argue about tabs vs spaces. Keep learning , keep trying , keep pushing , but no matter what DONT get stuck on wondering when and if it will happen - keep calm.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
It's weird how using AI tools changes the type of code you write. Writing extremely clear, easy-to-understand, consistent APIs has gone from nice-to-have to absolutely essential. If you name a variable badly you might find Claude spiral out, and files >500 lines chew so many tokens it's a daily practical concern to split them. Everyone talks about how AI slop means quality is going down but you get more of whatever you put into these tools. The more effort you put into quality the faster your tools can extend the code next time, so for teams that care, AI has only increased how often you talk about architecture, patterns, styles, etc.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
From Legacy Code to Clean Code — Powered by AI Every developer knows the pain of managing legacy code: 🔹 Tangled dependencies 🔹 Poor readability 🔹 High technical debt Now, AI-powered code refactoring is changing the game. ✅ Detects inefficient code automatically ✅ Suggests performance improvements ✅ Converts legacy blocks into clean, maintainable code The result? Faster delivery, fewer bugs, and happier developers. 🚀 As AI tools evolve, refactoring won’t just be a tedious chore — it’ll become a seamless part of development pipelines. 👉 Do you see AI as a co-pilot for developers or as the driver of the future of coding? #AIDevelopment #CodeRefactoring #AI #SoftwareEngineering #Productivity
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The most dangerous acronym developers hear is not AI. It's not ROI (Return On Investment). Or even MRR (Monthly Recurring Revenue). It's ASAP (As Soon As Possible). You've heard it: "We need to ship this feature ASAP." What they really mean is: "Cut corners. Make it work. We'll fix it later." Instead of splitting a table into 2, you have a table with 96 columns. Instead of small classes, there is one MEGA-SERVICE class with 3264 lines of code. Instead of separate modules within your solution, everything talks to everybody else. This isn't "moving fast". It's running when the end of the cliff is just in front of you. Deadlines matter. But if you sacrifice structure every time, you don't get speed. You get swamp. ASAP should not mean: "Abandon Structure And Pray."
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
GPT-5 Isn’t Just Coding... It’s Rewriting the Future of Software. 🚀 The era of human-only coding is over. GPT-5 is here — faster, smarter, unstoppable. From writing flawless code to eliminating bugs before you even notice them, this AI isn’t just helping developers... it’s changing the entire tech economy. 💡 Imagine products launching in days, not months. 💥 Imagine code that never sleeps. ⚡ Imagine AI as your ultimate co-pilot. This is not the future — it’s happening NOW. Watch closely. Adapt fast. Or get left behind. #GPT5 #AIRevolution #FutureOfWork #AI #CodingWithAI #TechRevolution #aixpertshub #NextGenTech #veo3 #googleveo3 #aiagency #usa #usmarketing #usabrands #usaworks #aixpertshub
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Vibe Coding ≠ Free Speed: Where to Draw the Lines “AI writes code so we can ship faster” only works if you design for quality. Treat AI pair programming like a power tool: useful with guards, dangerous without. 1) Make quality observable Adopt review checklists covering correctness, security, performance, maintainability. If you can’t measure it, it won’t improve. 2) Write generation policies Be explicit: where AI is allowed (templated logic, tests, docs, migrations), and where it’s not (critical algorithms, private protocols, compliance-sensitive paths). Publish examples. 3) Tests are the contract Freeze expectations before generation. Let the model vary implementation, not behavior. Gate merges on tests, not vibes. 4) Give the model only relevant context (RAG) Retrieve just the slices of code, style guides, and API surfaces that matter. Log prompts/outputs. Ban raw repo dumps into the model. 5) Standardize building blocks Create snippet catalogs and scaffolds so the model stops inventing one-off patterns. Fewer bespoke choices = fewer defects. Shipping discipline Stage rollouts, monitor latency/cost, and track defect escape rate. Your goal isn’t “more code,” it’s fewer, higher-quality decisions. With clear guardrails, AI pairing increases throughput without eroding reliability — and your incident rate (not your demo reel) will prove it. #AI #LLM #devproductivity #MLOps #softwarequality
To view or add a comment, sign in
-