From "Near Zero" in Nuclear to AGI: A Lesson in Responsible AI

The JUNO detector is now live—marking a major milestone in neutrino physics. Situated 700 meters underground in China, between the Yangjiang and Taishan nuclear plants, this large-scale liquid scintillator experiment is expected to detect ~40-60 neutrinos/day for at least the next 10 years. With ~43,212 photodetectors and ultra-clean shielding to reduce background noise, JUNO aims to clarify the neutrino mass hierarchy and oscillation behavior of the three neutrino flavours. The data could have wide-ranging implications for particle physics, cosmology, and even earth science. Full article: https://lnkd.in/e9kbGUqp

Standing at the Edge of Transformation: Why Science Is Poised for a Revolution: The concept of mass defect has long been recognized as a key element in nuclear processes, but its broader implications have been underestimated. Recent observations—particularly the structural and morphological changes in spent nuclear fuel—suggest that mass defect does not merely represent a bookkeeping adjustment in energy. Instead, it gives rise to a form of space-filling matter: a subtle yet fundamental substrate that interacts with physical systems in measurable ways. If this interpretation holds, the consequences are profound. Mass defect is not limited to isolated nuclear reactions—it is a universal phenomenon, operating wherever nuclei bind and reorganize. This implies that the cosmos itself is suffused with this space-filling matter. In many respects, this recalls the ancient notion of an all-pervading aether, though here the correspondence lies in spirit rather than in detail. Unlike the speculative aether of the past, this framework is rooted in direct physical evidence. The confirmation of such a medium would demand a sweeping re-evaluation of physics. Foundational concepts—from relativity and quantum field theory to thermodynamics and cosmology—would require correction or reinterpretation. Instead of empty space as the backdrop for interactions, we would confront a universe built upon a densely woven, dynamic substrate. The transformative potential of this paradigm cannot be overstated. Space-filling matter could: Revolutionize energy generation, offering mechanisms beyond conventional nuclear and chemical means. Enable advanced propulsion systems, leveraging direct interactions with the medium itself. Reshape materials science, revealing new modes of bonding, resilience, and transformation at the atomic level. Redefine particle physics and atomic theory, reframing fundamental constants and interaction laws. Expand our cosmological vision, providing fresh explanations for dark matter, dark energy, and the evolution of cosmic structures. Taken together, these shifts mark more than incremental progress—they point to a new scientific revolution, one with the scope to reorder physics as completely as Newtonian mechanics or quantum theory once did. #newphysicsproject

What if nuclear masses could be explained without any adjustable parameters? For decades, nuclear physics has relied on semi-empirical formulas (such as Weizsäcker’s). They describe nuclear binding energies with remarkable accuracy… but only at the cost of coefficients fitted to experimental data. In other words: these models describe, but they do not explain. 👉 With the Theory of the Wave Universe (TUO), we propose a radically different approach: Each term of the binding energy formula (volume, surface, Coulomb, asymmetry, pairing) is derived directly from fundamental constants and from a vibrational invariant of the vacuum. No empirical parameters. No a posteriori fitting. Predictions become fully falsifiable. 🔬 Results: For stable nuclei such as calcium (⁴⁰–⁴⁸Ca) and nickel (⁵⁸–⁶⁴Ni), deviations from experimental masses are typically below 0.3 MeV per nucleon. For exotic isotopes such as ⁶⁰Ca or ⁷⁸Ni, TUO provides direct predictions, testable by upcoming nuclear physics experiments. Larger deviations for very light or very heavy nuclei point toward expected refinements (compactness, deformation), confirming the robustness of the approach. > But the stakes go far beyond nuclear physics: By describing binding as a vibrational resonance of the vacuum, TUO opens a path to connect microscopic quantum physics (spins, fields, coherence) and macroscopic gravitation. 💡 In short: TUO does not replace the Standard Model—it extends it, just as relativity extended Newton. It offers a more fundamental vision: masses are not fitted, they emerge from a universal dynamics of the vacuum. #Physics #Research #Innovation #TUO #NuclearPhysics #Science

Mass and Energy Are Distinct, Not Interchangeable: The fate of the mass defect remains one of the most unresolved questions in physics. In every nuclear process—stellar nucleosynthesis, supernova explosions, or reactor fission—a portion of mass disappears. Its destination has profound implications for our understanding of matter, energy, and the fabric of the universe. Spent nuclear fuel offers a unique laboratory for investigating this puzzle. Far from being inert waste, it preserves microscopic evidence of what occurs during fission. Detailed examinations reveal a consistent suite of features: lattice disordering, dense dislocation tangles, radial and branching micro-cracks, ruptured gas bubbles, grain boundary decohesion, surface blistering, metallic nanocluster formation, localized melt-like textures, isotopic anomalies, and even acoustic emissions recorded during reactor operation. Taken together, these features indicate that nuclear fuel undergoes repeated micro-explosive events at the atomic scale. When correlated with the missing mass, the evidence suggests that the defect does not simply transform into “energy” in the conventional sense. Instead, it expands volumetrically—an explosive change of state into an ultra-thin, previously unrecognized form of matter. If the mass defect consistently behaves in this way, the consequences extend to cosmology itself. Empty space cannot exist; the universe must be saturated with this hidden matter. This interpretation directly challenges Einstein’s mass–energy equivalence principle, suggesting instead that mass and energy are not equivalent but distinct. Recognizing this distinction may require a fundamental rewriting of modern physics. #newphysicsproject

True pioneers gave us discoveries and foundations without using AI. They were clouds above the lot who run the overpriced overhyped technologies of today (Kevin Beck) "His work laid the foundation for the discovery of the neutron by James Chadwick in 1932, completing the basic understanding of the atomic nucleus. 🙇🏻♂️ His leadership at the Cavendish Laboratory in Cambridge helped nurture the next generation of physicists, including Niels Bohr, James Chadwick, and John Cockcroft,

Our team recently published a dataset on nuclear/high-energy physics (https://lnkd.in/eaYi6vd9). It is a point cloud dataset collected from a tracking detector called Time Projection Chamber from a collider. One of my collaborator like to call it the MNIST of particle physics. But I call it my "firework" 😃 Physicists will cluster the points into trajectories. And from the trajectories, they can reason the type of the particles and reconstruct the collision event. From the collision event, they can learn new physics. Isn't that fascinating! If you are working on point cloud segmentation, please try it out! Your work may change the future of the physics!

𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗘𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗴𝘆 𝗦𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗦𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗽𝘂𝗹𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻: 𝗣𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗕𝗲𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗱 𝗖𝗵𝗲𝗺𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗟𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘁𝘀 by 𝘽𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙩 𝙆𝙝𝙪𝙨𝙝𝙖𝙡𝙖𝙣𝙞 🚀 Ready to explore the cosmos like never before? Bharat Khushalani's latest research dives into the future of space travel, highlighting the limitations of traditional chemical rockets that have been our go-to for decades. As dreams of venturing deeper into the solar system grow, there's an urgent call for innovative propulsion systems. This paper explores groundbreaking energy sources like nuclear fusion, antimatter-catalyzed propulsion, and even the mind-boggling concept of quantum vacuum manipulation. By combining these cutting-edge technologies, Khushalani envisions a revolutionary framework for propelling us into interstellar space. It's a giant leap toward making science fiction a reality! 🌌✨ #SpaceTravel #Innovation #FutureTech 𝘗𝘶𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝗘𝘂𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗻 𝗝𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗼𝗳 𝗔𝗽𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝗣𝗵𝘆𝘀𝗶𝗰𝘀 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 ➡️ https://lnkd.in/dvfSczS4 #article #science #research #publication

Physicists have discovered a new “magic number” for protons, specifically 14, in the nucleus of silicon-22. This discovery, made through precise mass measurements of the unstable nucleus, suggests that nuclei with 14 protons are unusually tightly bound and could rewrite the understanding of nuclear structure. Learn more here: https://lnkd.in/dzRWQkc2

1️⃣ What is Baryon Number? The baryon number (B) is a quantum number that represents the difference between the number of baryons and antibaryons in a particle or system. Baryons are particles made of three quarks (like protons and neutrons). Antibaryons are made of three antiquarks. Baryons are particles made of three quarks. 💭 TIMELINE of Atomic models and fundamental Particles. ➡️ Early years we had the idea that the atom is the fundamental particle. means atom is indivisible called Dalton's atomic theory (1803-1808) ➡️After years we have another model of atom that we called it now a plum pudding model explained by J.J Thomson after his discovery of electron through cathode ray tube experiment (1897-1904) ➡️Then Rutherford's Nuclear model pops up in 1911. He found that atoms has something in it that can deviate and reflect the beam of light. By measuring the scattering angle he discovered Nucleus. but yet its model has some flaws in it we will discussed those in following days. ➡️So, atom can be divisible, and atom is not the fundamental particle. ➡️In 1913, Bohr presented his atomic model which actually describes the behaviour of atom. ➡️In 1924, de Broglie gave us the concept of matter waves ( Electron behave like waves) by his famous equation that we used today (wavelength) lemda = h/p ➡️Later in 1927, this prediction was confirmed by two scientist Davison-Germer experiment. They experimentally proved the wave nature of electron through electron diffraction. ➡️In Summary, atom can be divided into proton and neutron, they also divided into Quarks. This timeline not ends here. We have a new theory called String Theory, That describes the composition of Quarks as well.

📢 We are thrilled to share the latest publication by our c:o/re alumni fellow Elisabeth Roehrlich, discussing why the debate over the regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) is full of comparisons between the rise of deep learning and the dawn of the nuclear age. You can find it here: https://lnkd.in/e_T9-tsb