3 Ways to sharpen you NPS benchmarks

3 Ways to sharpen you NPS benchmarks

A lot of people in the NPS/VoC community are fond of benchmarks. Typically, these take the form of comparing scores to their competitors, or even companies outside the industry. If the score of the company’s own programme is higher than what can be observed in the market, the company gets to celebrate. If the score is below the market average, urgent action programmes are launched to prevent the demise of the business.

While there is business case to ensure that your Net Promoter or other score outperforms the competition, there is more to benchmarking than comparing numbers.

 Here’s a few tips to help you check that your benchmarks are properly executed:

 Remember: benchmarking is about more than numbers.

When conducting benchmarks, most companies look at the score. How is the business performing compared to the competition? But just like with your own Net Promoter or VOC programme, the score is consequence of your actions. If your biggest competitor scores 20 points above yourself, the key question isn’t the score differential, but the reason why the score differential exists. 

Action: Every benchmarking program should ask respondents why competing brands scored the way they do and what these brands could do to improve their results. Comparing this data to your own, not only shows whether you are winning or losing the match. It also unearths opportunities to attack your competitors on the weaknesses and inversely, avoid their strengths.

Make sure you compare apples with apples

Benchmarking yourself against the competition assumes that the companies you select for comparison are indeed competitors. This means that they serve a similar set of clients than your own, with a similar value proposition/service. Change one of these two parameters, and the results may misguide you. 

This realisation is both restrictive and expansive. It is restrictive, because in your own industry, you want to make sure that you do not compare yourself to the wrong competitors. For example, if you are Kia, it would make sense to look at the likes of Toyota, Honda, Seat and other brands in your category. You would probably be right to question the benefit of comparing yourself to BMW or Lexus.

However, it is also expansive. Today's customers compare experiences across brands and industries. So it is important to understand the experiences that make yourcustomers recommend brands in other industries. Sooner or later, these customers will expect similar service levels from yourself. So in our hypothetical Kia case, fitness instructors and dentists suddenly enter the mix. After all, from a consumer’s perspective there is little difference between scheduling a dentist appointment dentist appointment or making an appointment to get their car serviced.

Action: Make sure you really pay attention to your competitive set, both within and outside of your industry. And if you’re not sure who to include/exclude, sit down with a number of your promoters and ask them. They’ll be happy to help.

Question your motives

Finally, before embarking or continuing some great benchmarking effort, you should question your motives. For many companies, the goal of benchmarking is that they want to be #1 in their industry. But what do you do once you reach that goal? If the number #1 CX player in your industry achieves a Net Promoter or other score of 63%, what number should you to aim for? Is the job done when you hit 65%? Should it be 70%? 

Some of the VoC superstars that I know, are starting to challenge the goal of being #1 in the industry. One reason is that they find it increasingly difficult to motivate people to achieve even better experiences once the number #1 spot is achieved. But more importantly, they point out that a benchmark-based objective can distract people from the real goal: to profitably turn every customer into a promoter for the brand. 

This isn’t just rhetoric, it’s hard business sense. Even if you’re #1 in your category, there will still be customers who can make you more money as promoters than it would cost to bring them to that point. Every opportunity you miss, is money you leave on the table.

Action: Before embarking or continuing any benchmark, ask yourself the question: What is my motive? If it is to check your performance and get inspired by competitive behaviour across industries, a benchmark can be a great tool. However, if there is a risk that a chase to be #1 turns into an objective which distracts, you should watch out. You may run the risk of being a one-eyed king in the land of the blind.

I hope you consider these tips useful.

Happy benchmarking 😃 


IF YOU LIKE THIS ARTICLE: SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE

If you would like to read more of what I write about customer experience, storytelling and related subjects, register for my newsletter on alainthys.com.

It comes with articles, reading tips and the occasional freebie/preview. Alternatively, if you want to talk to me about any of these topics do get in touch.

I am a bit cautious with benchmarks. I've found that they can reinforce the behavior of being too focused on the number and not the real goal of improving business performance. Also when comparing scores to benchmarks I like to validate the comparison with other measures such as market share changes.

Maurice FitzGerald

Editor in Chief - Content - OCX Cognition

8y

Good points Alain. As to what Colin says, I tend to agree for survey types other than benchmarks. When I funded Qualtrics and IPSOS to do benchmarks for HP Software, covering close to 50 competitive brands, the 40 smaller software companies were well below the average of the 10 largest.

Alain Thys

Drive premium profit by enriching lives ⬩Experience & Transformation Architect⬩ Founder, The Transformation Architects

8y

Hi Colin Long time no speak ;-) You make some fair points, which IMHO also underline that you're a quite "evolved species" when it comes to this topic. The way you describe the Kia/BMW conversation, I'm with you, as long it doesn't translate into budget brands chasing CX standards of brands 3-4 margin brackets above them (which may have little relevance to their consumer segment). Unfortunately I've seen this happen more than once. On self-selection bias, I agree. Which is why I typically recommend not ONLY relying on NPS to benchmark performance (but that would be another article itself - or perhaps I should have included it in this one ;-) Thanks for the sparring!

Colin Shea

Experienced corporate strategy and business development executive

8y

Where I do have an issue with NPS is the small brand self-selection bias v big brands. Small brands often have high NPS not because they are necessarily better, but because people who choose them make an ex post rationalization of their purchase decision. If you are making a different choice than most everyone else, either you are smarter than everyone else or dumber. Which are you? Of course smarter. Ergo you recommend others to make the same smart choice. NPS benchmarking between small brands and big brands can lead to small brands taking exaggerated comfort in their competitive advantage and bigger ones excessively panicking about their market position.

Colin Shea

Experienced corporate strategy and business development executive

8y

Oh, I'm not sure about the Kia/ BMW dichotomy. It's sort of the vague genius of NPS that the customer life situation is already implicit in the recommendation. I mean, if I answer 'yes' that I would recommend my BMW 7 series, I'm surely not saying I would recommend it to everyone, eg not my cousin Bill who just got out of prison and has no money, nor my cousin Bob who runs a landscaping business and probably needs a pickup truck. I am implicitly saying I recommend it for those who are in a sort of equivalent situation/ purchasing power bracket. In that sense I am answering how it met my needs and expectations when I bought it. Was it worth the money? Did it live up to marketing promises? Were there any (un)pleasant surprises coming after the sale? From that point of view I wouldn't have an issue benchmarking Kia v BWM.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Others also viewed

Explore content categories