7 Best Team Effectiveness Models and How to Choose the Right One in 2025

If there’s one thing every founder, project manager, and startup operator learns the hard way, it’s this: having great people on your team doesn't guarantee great teamwork.

Talent matters. But alignment, trust, clarity, and ownership matter more.

At Genetech, we’ve seen countless teams, both internally and across clients, run into the same core problems: miscommunication, fuzzy roles, lack of follow-through, or disengagement. And while no one framework can solve it all, certain team effectiveness models have stood the test of time. These models have helped leaders design teams that are more than the sum of their parts.

In this issue of the Business Booster Bulletin, let’s learn how to use them.

Whether you’re building a new squad, navigating remote collaboration, or re-aligning after rapid growth, there’s a model here to fit your need. Let’s break them down.

1. Tuckman’s Model: Know What Phase You’re In

Source: The 5 Tuckman's Stages of Group Development for Training

First up: the classic five stages of team development — Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing, and Adjourning. Tuckman’s model is a roadmap that reminds us: friction isn’t failure. It’s just part of growth.

If you’ve just spun up a new team, added a few fresh faces, or merged functions, you’re probably somewhere between “Forming” and “Storming.” People are unclear on expectations, roles are being negotiated, and tensions may be rising. That’s normal.

The key? Don’t treat it like a red flag. Treat it like a phase. At Genetech, we often open new projects with a quick discussion on where we are in this cycle. Just naming it helps teams normalize tension and focus on moving forward.

2. Lencioni’s 5 Dysfunctions: Fix What’s Broken

Source: The Five Dysfunctions of a Team by Patrick Lencioni: Key Takeaways — Crafted Solutions

Some teams don’t need to “form” — they need to unblock. Lencioni’s model identifies five dysfunctions that quietly derail performance: absence of trust, fear of conflict, lack of commitment, avoidance of accountability, and inattention to results.

If your team avoids hard conversations or hesitates to challenge decisions, you might be stuck in a cycle of polite stagnation. Everyone shows up, but no one fully owns outcomes.

The antidote is uncomfortable but necessary: vulnerability, candor, and collective accountability. That means creating space for disagreement, defining shared goals, and reinforcing the idea that we rise or fall together.

3. GRPI: Fix the Foundations First

Source: GRPI Model PowerPoint Template Designs - SlideGrand

Before you book a team retreat or run trust exercises, ask: Do we even agree on our goals? Are roles clearly defined?

The GRPI model — short for Goals, Roles, Processes, Interpersonal — is often the most underused and most effective team tool, especially for fast-moving startups or hybrid teams. It brings the basics back into focus.

At Genetech, we’ve used GRPI check-ins to get projects back on track when execution starts to feel fuzzy. Usually, it turns out we’re aligned on 70% of the goal but that last 30%? That’s where delays and misunderstandings live.

A one-hour GRPI alignment session can save you weeks of clean-up.

4. Hackman’s 5 Conditions: Build It Right the First Time

Source: Hackman model of team effectiveness, explained | Five factors for great teamwork — BiteSize Learning 

Psychologist J. Richard Hackman argued that team success doesn’t start with soft skills — it starts with structure. His five conditions for team effectiveness include a real team (not just a group), compelling direction, enabling structure, supportive context, and access to expert coaching.

This model shines when you're building a strategic team from scratch or scaling a remote function. Think product teams, dev squads, or client delivery pods.

If you’ve ever put talented people together and still felt the outcomes were “meh,” Hackman explains why. People need structure, autonomy, and clarity not just a Slack channel and good intentions.

5. Katzenbach & Smith: From Working Group to Real Team

Source: Katzenbach and Smith Model PowerPoint Presentation Slides - PPT Template

Katzenbach and Smith draw a subtle but crucial distinction: not all groups are teams. In fact, many “teams” are just working groups — individuals doing parallel work with minimal collaboration or shared accountability.

To move from working group → real team → high-performing team, you need a shared purpose, complementary skills, and mutual commitment.

This model helps you level-set. Ask yourself: Do we really share goals? Or are we just coordinating? If the answer is the latter, it might be time to re-engineer team norms and rewards to encourage deeper collaboration.

6. Google’s Project Aristotle: Culture Eats Talent for Breakfast

Source: Project Aristotle for Effective Teams - Mutomorro

Google studied hundreds of teams and found that the most successful ones weren’t defined by who was on the team — but how they worked together.

The standout trait? Psychological safety. When people feel safe to speak up, make mistakes, and take risks, performance follows. Other key factors included dependability, structure and clarity, meaning, and impact.

This model is especially useful when your team has the skills but lacks spark. You might be shipping, but you’re not innovating. You might be meeting deadlines, but no one’s excited.

Creating safety doesn’t require overhauling culture. Start with smaller rituals like giving everyone a voice in decision-making or simply kicking off meetings with an honest pulse check.

7. Drexler/Sibbet Model: Don’t Skip the “Why”

Source: A Model Depicting Team Development Stages | The Grove Consultants 

Finally, the Drexler/Sibbet team performance model outlines seven phases — from orientation and trust-building to goal clarification and high performance — ending in renewal.

What we love about this framework is its emphasis on why we’re doing this — and how we continuously reflect. Teams aren’t just machines to be optimized. They evolve. They need pauses, resets, and re-commitment.

Use this model when your team has been “in motion” for a while but feels flat. Maybe the rituals feel stale. Maybe the energy’s dipped. A renewal conversation might be what brings the fire back.

🔍 Which One’s Right for You?

Each of these models solves a different kind of problem. Here’s a quick way to find your fit:

You’re a good team, just stuck. → Lencioni or Aristotle You’re a new team, building from scratch. → Tuckman or Hackman You’re growing fast and roles are blurring. → GRPI or Hackman You’re productive but disconnected. → Katzenbach or Drexler You’re high-functioning but not high-performing. → Aristotle

If you're unsure where your team stands — or which framework would help you grow — we’d love to jump on a call. No pitches. Just a real conversation about making your team work better.

🔗 Book a free 30-minute team clarity session

Or reply in the comments:

Which of these models have you tried before? And which one will you explore next?

Want more actionable frameworks in your feed? 📩 Subscribe to the Business Booster Bulletin and follow Genetech for sharp insights!