AI Adoption: A Use Case Maturity Model for Enterprises

AI Adoption: A Use Case Maturity Model for Enterprises

By Geoffrey Moore

Author – The Infinite Staircase: What the Universe Tells Us About Life, Ethics, and Mortality


In the current AI era, the speed of innovation far exceeds the speed of adoption.  As a result, both vendors and prospective customers have a common need for a framework to gauge where any given enterprise stands today with respect to AI, where it thinks it needs to get to, and what kind of steps it would take to do so.

To set the stage properly, recall that there are three major strands of AI in the market today—predictive, generative, and agentic.  The first has been with us for decades and is not part of the current adoption challenge.  Generative, on the other hand, is although it has clearly crossed the chasm as witnessed by widespread consumer adoption of LLMs.  The question it poses for enterprise adoption is economic: what use cases should be prioritized and where will the ROI come from?  Agentic AI, on the other hand, is still on the Early Market side of the chasm.  The question it poses is what use cases would warrant immediate adoption before it goes into general availability.

With this context in mind, below is a first cut at a maturity model focused on deploying generative and agentic AI.  The use cases mentioned are meant to be representative, not exhaustive.  I like to call such models stairways to heaven.  The goal is to help prospective customers better assess what stair should be their ultimate goal, what stair they find themselves on today, and what stair they should focus on to get their next set of returns.

Article content

  1. AI-augmented Decision Support.  Because it is inherently human-in-the-loop and augments an already established practice, it is relatively low-risk and easy to adopt.  The value is based on improving decision-making by giving access to data that might otherwise be neglected. ROI will be gated by how much first-party data beyond the public LLMs can be included. 
  2. Intelligent Robotic Process Automation.  RPA has been around for more than a decade as a departmental productivity improvement tool based on knowledge workers taking a low-code approach to automating time-consuming routine workflows.  Adding AI to the mix allows RPA to expand its reach into processes that drag human decision-makers back into the workflow, such as classifying, routing, or prioritizing, all according to what, in the end, are deterministic algorithms.
  3. Intelligent Document Processing.  There is a trove of trapped value in approval processes that require multiple reviews to complete.  To the extent that these reviews are algorithmic, they can simply be replaced.  Those that require judgment can be accelerated by pre-processing the documentation to extract and foreground the relevant information.  The ROI comes from accelerated decision-making, particularly relevant for deal desks and loan approvals.
  4. Enterprise Knowledge Management.  In any consultative practice, there is a trove of trapped value in its legacy of presentations and reports.  They are all on file somewhere, but navigating them is such a chore nobody bothers to.  Running this data set through an LLM and putting an “Ask Me Anything” button in front of it not only eliminates drudgery but improves the quality of work products dramatically.  This is the first deeply compelling ROI case in this maturity model.
  5. Customer Support Agents.  As more and more work goes virtual, staying connected to the customer becomes increasingly important.  Human agents shine where empathy and creative intelligence are needed, but wait times can be painful, and there are numerous transactions that can be better handled via self-service.  Additionally, AI agents can learn as they go with any gains in expertise becoming immediately available across the entire customer service footprint.  The ROI here comes not just from labor reduction, but from faster response times, higher customer satisfaction, and the opportunity to redeploy human resources to higher-value tasks.
  6. Service Request Triage and Routing.  At this stair, AI adoption transitions from improving the productivity of individuals to that of entire systems.  That makes the risk bar much higher but also the ROI from successful implementations much greater.  Here third-party enterprise application vendors have a big advantage over in-house teams as they can leverage decades of process learning even as they revamp the way that knowledge is put to work.  The gains come from faster mean time to repair, less scrap and rework, and optimal prioritization of scarce resources. 
  7. Workflow Reengineering.  On this stair the business objective escalates from automating processes that are context (industry-standard non-differentiating) to enabling those that are core (competitively differentiating).  This is strictly DIY and cannot be outsourced to a third-party vendor for the simple reason that they would then be free to sell the same thing to your competition.  The key lesson here is make sure you are allocating your DIY resources to core and not to context.  Should you fail to do so, not only will you be missing present opportunities, you will also have committed yourself long term to maintaining applications that do not differentiate and whose costs cannot be amortized across a base of multiple customers.
  8. Autonomous Decision Systems.  This is the holy grail of AI.  As digital transformations continue to expand their footprints, the overall web of interrelated systems increases in both scope and complexity.  We humans are simply not suited to monitoring such systems, so we must assimilate more and more AI into our enterprise architecture, whether we like it or not.  The focus of most of this work will be on mission-critical context (work that does not differentiate but carries severe penalties for making mistakes).  Because the risks are so material, the natural tendency is to invest scarce expert resources regardless.  Autonomous decision systems can solve for this conundrum provided they can be deployed in stages that allow for incremental learning as well as damage control along the way.

Eight stairs may be too many, but this is just a first cut, so I am very much looking forward to future iterations that make it more fit for purpose.

That’s what I think.  What do you think?


Follow Geoff on LinkedIn | Geoffrey Moore Main Mailing List | Infinite Staircase Mailing List


Geoffrey Moore | Infinite Staircase Site | Geoffrey Moore Twitter | Infinite Staircase Twitter | Facebook | YouTube

Interesting framing — but I can’t help noticing a missing strand. Predictive, generative, and agentic may be the visible three, but what about adversarial AI? We’ve already seen how evasion, poisoning, and mimicry can destabilize even mature systems. Any “stairway” that doesn’t account for adversarial dynamics risks building fragility into its very steps. The other piece that feels underexplored here is system dynamics, an area where Nelson Repenning ‘s work has been invaluable. Adoption isn’t a linear climb. Reinforcing loops (like efficiency gains that fuel overreliance) and balancing loops (like regulatory pushback or workforce bottlenecks) can dramatically alter trajectories. Without surfacing those feedback effects, frameworks risk looking neat on paper but failing under pressure. Perhaps the deeper question is not “which stair should we aim for?” but “how do we align adoption with the system’s actual safety signals, including adversarial pressures and dynamic feedbacks?” Without that, frameworks become elegant ladders to brittle outcomes. #AI #SystemsThinking #AdversarialAI #Resilience #SystemDynamics

Like
Reply
Tomasz Urbaniak

🌩️ Strategy Consultant → Cloud & AI | AWS + Terraform Certified | AWS SA-Pro (Sept) | Strategy + Technical Execution

2d

I really like this framing, Geoffrey. Too often, and especially at the moment, AI adoption gets talked about as a binary: “pilot” or “full rollout.” The stair-step model is a much truer picture of reality — every layer adds both risk and ROI. In my work, I’ve seen plenty of enterprises leap two stairs at once (say, from document processing to system-wide routing) only to stall because the foundations weren’t ready. The trick seems to be knowing when to climb fast vs. when to consolidate. I'm curious as to which step you think enterprises are most overestimating their readiness for right now?

Like
Reply
Irina Malkova

VP Product Data & AI at Salesforce

2d

Geoffrey Moore so curious that you say AI-augmented decision support will happen before Customer Support agents. I see the opposite. At Salesforce, our Customer Support agent is already a mature deployment with 1M+ conversations. AI-augmented decision support is growing, but still early. Agentic Customer Support is an established $12B market. AI-augmented decision support isn’t even a defined market yet (though I’m trying to make “Decisioning Agents” happen! I think it’s a great name). This makes sense considering the tech: LLMs are built to generate, not decide. Automating decisions usually means building an enterprise ontology first. It’s hard. Curious what made you order the ladder the way you did?

Joseph Awujoola-Kalohun

Content Strategist | Data Analyst | Bridging the Gap between Data and Words

3d

This resonates. One question we often ask clients is: Which step will move the needle fastest for your business today? Sometimes it’s decision support, sometimes it’s reengineering workflows, but clarity on ROI at each step makes the journey less overwhelming.

Like
Reply
Aman Monga

Senior Solar Consultant | Helping AU businesses cut power bills 80–90% with solar and battery rebates

3d

Maturity models guide smart strategy. Geoffrey Moore

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories