AI Solutions Framework Report
An in-depth and comprehensive report on AI Security Frameworks and Solutions, synthesizing the provided sources.
Section 1: Executive Summary
The enterprise adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has crossed a critical threshold, moving from experimental deployments to business-critical operations1. As of April 2025, 42% of enterprises are actively implementing AI, particularly generative models (GenAI) and large language models (LLMs), with another 45% in the exploration phase2. This rapid integration, however, has introduced a new and complex threat landscape3.
The proliferation of unsanctioned or "Shadow AI" usage, where employees utilize generative AI tools without formal oversight, has significantly expanded the corporate attack surface and increased risks of data exposure and compliance violations44. The consequences are tangible and severe; recent studies indicate that 40% of organizations have already experienced an AI-related privacy breach, with the cost of such incidents averaging millions of dollars5. This reality establishes a new, non-negotiable imperative for Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs) to implement a structured, comprehensive security strategy that spans the entire AI data lifecycle6.
The market for "AI Security" is not a single category but a dynamic convergence of established security domains and new AI-native solutions7. Leading analyst firms like Gartner and Forrester are actively defining this emerging space through frameworks such as AI Trust, Risk, and Security Management (AI TRiSM)88. This reflects the market's fragmented ecosystem where traditional cybersecurity leaders extend their platforms, while startups build solutions to address AI-specific vulnerabilities from the ground up9. There is no single "Magic Quadrant" for AI Security, as no single vendor has mastered the entire problem set10.
This report confirms that no single solution provides end-to-end coverage across all phases of the AI data security lifecycle11. Consequently, enterprises must adopt a multi-layered, multi-vendor security strategy. The most significant innovation is concentrated in Foundational Model Protection and MLSecOps, driven by startups addressing threats like prompt injection, model theft, and AI supply chain vulnerabilities13. While incumbent vendors adapt existing tools, innovators are defining the market with new tool categories like automated AI red teaming14. The core strategic recommendation is to shift from a tool-centric procurement model to a risk-based, lifecycle-oriented strategy, asking not "Which AI security tool should we buy?" but "How do we secure our entire AI lifecycle?".
Section 2: The Evolving Threat Landscape & Guiding Frameworks
Key Risks in AI Security
The use of generative models introduces significant vulnerabilities16. These risks demand an end-to-end security approach covering all stages from data collection to runtime monitoring17. Key risks include:
Prompt Injections and Manipulation: These are attacks that manipulate model responses through malicious inputs18. A notable example includes an OpenAI Denial-of-Service (DoS) attack in November 2023 caused by malicious inputs19.
Data and Model Poisoning: This involves inserting malicious data into training datasets or embedding backdoors into models, which compromises their integrity20. An example is a poisoned GPT-J-6B model discovered on Hugging Face21.
Anomalous Outputs and Hallucinations: Models can generate unexpected or factually incorrect outputs, which can be dangerous in critical applications22.
Supply Chain and Governance Vulnerabilities: The use of open-source models can introduce vulnerable components, necessitating traceability through mechanisms like an AI Bill of Materials23.
Shadow AI and Over-Permissioning: The informal adoption of AI tools by employees without formal oversight increases the risk of data exposure and compliance violations24.
Unauthorized AI Use: Employees using AI tools without formal oversight, also known as "Shadow AI," expands the corporate attack surface25.
Standard Frameworks for AI Security
To manage these multifaceted risks, several standard frameworks provide essential guidance26262626.
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF): Released on January 26, 2023, with a specific GenAI profile added on July 26, 2024, this framework focuses on managing AI risks to individuals, organizations, and society27. It is supported by resources like the AI RMF Playbook and a public roadmap28.
Google's Secure AI Framework (SAIF): This framework includes six core elements, such as expanding security foundations and automating defenses, which align with Google's broader AI Principles29.
DHS Framework for AI in Critical Infrastructure: Released by the Department of Homeland Security on November 14, 2024, this framework provides recommendations for cloud providers, AI developers, and operators30. It covers secure environments, responsible design, data governance, secure deployment, and ongoing monitoring31.
Gartner AI Trust, Risk, and Security Management (AI TRiSM): This framework organizes security capabilities into distinct technical layers: AI Governance, AI Runtime Inspection and Enforcement, Information Governance, and Infrastructure & Stack. It serves as an effective lens for viewing the landscape where different vendors compete33.
Section 3: A Unified Framework for AI Data Security & Solution Evaluation
The 7-Phase AI Data Security Lifecycle
To effectively manage AI risks, a structured lifecycle approach is paramount34. This report uses a 7-phase framework that deconstructs the AI data journey and serves as the analytical backbone for evaluating solutions35. These phases are a chronological chain of dependencies where a failure in an early phase creates unmitigable risks downstream36.
Phase 1: Data Sourcing Security: Validates the origin, ownership, and licensing rights of all ingested data37. This is foundational for building trustworthy and legally defensible AI, as emphasized by regulations like the EU AI Act38383838.
Phase 2: Data Infrastructure Security: Ensures that data warehouses, lakes, and pipelines are hardened and access-controlled to prevent data theft or model poisoning at the source39. This aligns with the "Infrastructure & Stack" layer of Gartner's AI TRiSM framework40.
Phase 3: Data In-Transit Security: Protects data as it moves between systems using cryptographic controls like TLS encryption. Data is often most vulnerable when in motion42.
Phase 4: API Security for Foundational Models: Safeguards the APIs used to connect with third-party LLMs like OpenAI or Anthropic43. These APIs have become a critical new attack surface that can lead to data leaks, IP exposure, or high costs44.
Phase 5: Foundational Model Protection: Defends proprietary models against AI-native attacks such as prompt injection, model inversion, and data poisoning. This requires specialized tools like AI firewalls and runtime monitoring46.
Phase 6: Incident Response for AI Data Breaches: Establishes pre-defined protocols for handling breaches, harmful hallucinations, or other AI-generated harm47. This involves adapting traditional frameworks like NIST's to the unique challenges of AI48.
Phase 7: CI/CD for Models (with Security Hooks): Integrates security directly into the model development lifecycle, a practice known as MLSecOps or DevSecAI49494949. This involves embedding model scanning, vulnerability testing, and provenance tracking into CI/CD pipelines50.
Comprehensive Evaluation Criteria
A holistic evaluation framework ensures all aspects of an AI security solution are considered51. Key criteria include:
Governance and Compliance: Ability to create AI service catalogs, assign risk scores, and ensure compliance with standards like NIST AI RMF52.
Data Security and Privacy: Protection against data leaks, ensuring confidentiality, and providing robust access controls, including PII redaction53.
Model Security: Protection against model theft, poisoning, and adversarial attacks54.
Runtime Security: Real-time monitoring and response to threats like prompt injections and jailbreaks during operation55.
Observability and Monitoring: Tools for logging, auditing, and detecting misuse to ensure transparency56.
Red Teaming and Penetration Testing: Capabilities to proactively test security defenses57.
Integration and Scalability: Ease of integration with existing systems and the ability to scale58.
Vendor Support and Viability: Evaluation of a vendor's funding, market presence, and support to mitigate lock-in risks59.
Cost and ROI: Analysis of implementation and maintenance costs versus the benefits of risk mitigation60.
User Experience and Usability: Ease of use, quality of documentation, and support for both security and development teams61.
Section 4: The 2025 Vendor Landscape: In-Depth Analysis
Vendor Archetypes
The 20 commercial solutions analyzed can be categorized into four primary archetypes, which helps in understanding each vendor's core strengths and strategic intent62.
The Hyperscale Platforms (Google Cloud, Microsoft): These tech giants offer comprehensive, deeply integrated security capabilities native to their cloud ecosystems63. Their value is a seamless, unified platform experience64.
The Consolidated Cybersecurity Platforms (CrowdStrike, Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler, Fortinet, SentinelOne, Vectra AI, Darktrace): Established cybersecurity leaders extending their existing platforms (XDR, SASE, NDR) to provide protection for AI workloads and infrastructure65.
The Data-Centric & Governance Specialists (Cyera, Immuta, Thales, IBM, Credo AI, Enveil): These vendors focus intensely on the data itself as the center of the AI security universe, excelling in data discovery, classification, access control, and governance66.
The MLSecOps & Model Security Innovators (Protect AI, Mindgard, Lakera, CalypsoAI, AIShield, Zenity, Abnormal Security): This new breed of startups is purpose-built to address unique, AI-native vulnerabilities within the model lifecycle, focusing on model scanning, red teaming, and securing the AI supply chain67. Other key innovators in this space include HiddenLayer, Noma, Guardrails AI, WhyLabs, Witness AI, Lasso Security, and TrojAI68.
In-Depth Solution Analysis
Hyperscale Platforms
Google Cloud Platform (GCP): Offers a fully integrated AI and security ecosystem, recognized as a "Leader" by Forrester in Data Security and AI Infrastructure69. Its strategy embeds security into its Vertex AI platform and cloud infrastructure using services like Security Command Center, Sensitive Data Protection, and the purpose-built Model Armor70. Google provides comprehensive or strong coverage across all seven phases of the AI security lifecycle, from data sourcing via its Secure AI Framework (SAIF) to CI/CD integration with Vertex AI Pipelines.
Microsoft: Provides a comprehensive suite of security tools under the Microsoft Security umbrella, securing the entire stack from Azure infrastructure to applications like Microsoft 365 Copilot72. The architecture weaves together Microsoft Purview for data governance, Defender for Cloud for posture management, Sentinel for SIEM/SOAR, and Entra for identity, all augmented by the Security Copilot73. Microsoft offers comprehensive or strong coverage across all seven phases, using Purview for data sourcing and governance, and Defender for Cloud for infrastructure and model protection. While not designed for LLM-specific risks, Defender provides robust IT infrastructure protection and needs additional integrations for full AI coverage7575.
Consolidated Cybersecurity Platforms
CrowdStrike: A leader in endpoint and cloud security, its AI-native Falcon platform extends its agent-based and agentless architecture to cover AI risks76. It combines Falcon Cloud Security, which includes AI Security Posture Management (AI-SPM), with its generative AI assistant, Charlotte AI77. CrowdStrike is strong in infrastructure security, model protection, incident response, and CI/CD security but has limited capabilities in data sourcing.
Palo Alto Networks: Integrates AI-specific protections into its Prisma Cloud and Strata platforms79. Prisma Cloud offers a comprehensive CNAPP with AI-SPM, while AI Access Security controls workforce access to GenAI apps80. The platform is strong across infrastructure security, API security, model protection (bolstered by the acquisition of Protect AI), incident response via Cortex XSIAM, and CI/CD security. Cortex XSOAR, while a market leader, is a complex implementation and not LLM-specific82.
Zscaler: As a leader in Secure Access Service Edge (SASE), Zscaler's Zero Trust Exchange provides visibility and control over data flowing to AI applications through its inline proxy architecture. It offers comprehensive coverage for data in-transit and API security, directly combating "Shadow AI" with granular policy controls. It also provides strong model protection through "AI Guardrails" but has limited capabilities in data sourcing, infrastructure hardening, and CI/CD integration.
Fortinet: The Fortinet Security Fabric integrates AI-driven capabilities (FortiAI) across its product suite, including FortiGate firewalls and FortiDLP. It is strong in securing data infrastructure, data-in-transit, APIs, and models, with a robust incident response platform accelerated by the FortiAI-Assist GenAI assistant. Its coverage is limited in data sourcing governance and CI/CD pipeline integration.
SentinelOne: The AI-powered Singularity Platform offers a unified XDR and SIEM solution with a single agent for endpoint, cloud, and identity. Its strengths lie in data infrastructure security via its AI-SPM module, runtime model protection, and comprehensive incident response supercharged by its Purple AI analyst. Coverage is limited in data sourcing and moderate in API security and CI/CD integration.
Vectra AI: A leader in AI-driven Network Detection and Response (NDR), Vectra's agentless platform analyzes network traffic and cloud logs to find attacker behaviors post-compromise. It excels at detecting threats within data infrastructure and in-transit, even in encrypted traffic. Its Attack Signal Intelligence accelerates incident response94. However, it has no capabilities for data sourcing or CI/CD security and moderate protection for APIs and models.
Darktrace: Another NDR leader, Darktrace uses Self-Learning AI to build a baseline of "normal" behavior and detect anomalous activity across networks, cloud, email, and endpoints. It is strong in detecting threats to data infrastructure and data-in-transit. Its Cyber AI Analyst and Autonomous Response capabilities provide powerful incident response98. It has no data sourcing or CI/CD capabilities and moderate coverage for API and model protection. While a market leader, it is not LLM-specific and may require extra configuration.
Lacework: This platform provides cloud-native anomaly detection and monitoring, excelling in cloud environments. While strong for infrastructure security, it is not LLM-specific and requires integrations for comprehensive AI security.
Data-Centric & Governance Specialists
Cyera: A leader in Data Security Posture Management (DSPM), Cyera provides deep context on data across the hybrid cloud with its AI-native, agentless platform. It is strong in data sourcing security and comprehensive in data infrastructure security, identifying misconfigurations and risks from non-human identities like AI tools1. Its capabilities are limited or moderate in other phases.
Immuta: Specializing in data access control, Immuta's platform acts as a policy enforcement layer on top of data infrastructure like Snowflake and Databricks. It offers comprehensive data infrastructure security with fine-grained, dynamic access control107. It is also strong in data sourcing via its Data Marketplace and incident response with its Unified Audit feature. Its primary contribution to model protection is securing data for RAG use cases109.
Thales: A long-standing leader in encryption and key management, Thales's CipherTrust Data Security Platform unifies data discovery, protection, and key management110. It offers comprehensive security for data infrastructure and data-in-transit, and strong protection for models via encryption of the model files themselves. Its new AI Data Security Assistant aids in incident response112.
IBM: The IBM Guardium Data Security Center provides a unified platform for data and AI security113. It offers comprehensive data infrastructure security and strong coverage for data sourcing, data-in-transit, API security (via an AI Gateway), model protection (with AI Red-Teaming), and incident response (via QRadar SIEM).
Credo AI: A specialized vendor focused exclusively on AI governance, risk, and compliance115. Its Responsible AI Governance Platform acts as an intelligence layer to translate policies into technical controls116. It is strong in data sourcing governance, incident response (by providing an audit-ready single source of truth), and CI/CD integration by embedding compliance into the ML lifecycle.
Enveil: A pioneer in Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PETs), Enveil's ZeroReveal® solutions use homomorphic encryption to perform computations on encrypted data118. This provides strong protection for data sourcing (enabling secure collaboration), data infrastructure, and models (enabling encrypted training and inference), as well as comprehensive security for data-in-transit.
MLSecOps & Model Security Innovators
Protect AI: A leader in the MLSecOps space, its platform offers end-to-end visibility and governance120. It provides comprehensive model protection through Guardian (model scanning) and Recon (automated red teaming) and comprehensive CI/CD integration121121. It also has strong API security via its Layerproduct122. With $60M in Series B funding, it's considered ideal for organizations developing models internally, though implementation can be complex.
Mindgard: This platform offers what it calls the first Dynamic Application Security Testing for AI (DAST-AI), focusing on finding runtime vulnerabilities through automated red teaming. It provides comprehensive model protection and strong integration with CI/CD pipelines to run continuous security tests.
Laverà: A real-time GenAI security company providing an AI application firewall, Lakera Guard126126126126. Known for its educational tool Gandalf, Lakera offers comprehensive protection for APIs and models against prompt injection, data leakage, and harmful content. With $30M in funding and use by Fortune 500 companies, it's vital for regulated sectors but focuses on output governance.
CalypsoAI: Provides a model-agnostic security and enablement platform that acts as a security gateway or firewall for LLMs. It offers comprehensive API and model protection with scanners for jailbreaks, PII, and malicious code, as well as AI red-teaming capabilities. It has strong CI/CD and incident response support.
AIShield (Bosch): A full-stack security product defending AI workloads from development to deployment132. It offers comprehensive model protection via AISpectra (vulnerability assessment for over 200 attack types) and strong API security through its Guardian middleware. It also has strong CI/CD and incident response integrations.
Zenity: A specialized platform focused exclusively on securing AI Agents—autonomous systems that can reason and act135. Its agent-centric design unifies AI Observability, AISPM, and AI Detection & Response (AIDR)136. It provides comprehensive security for agent APIs and the models they use, with strong capabilities for incident response and CI/CD integration through buildtime guardrails.
Abnormal Security: A leader in AI-native email security that uses behavioral AI to stop socially-engineered attacks138. Its innovation lies in using autonomous AI agents, like the AI Security Mailbox, to automate incident response tasks, representing a new security model. It provides strong protection for data-in-transit (email) but has limited or no capabilities in most other phases.
Lasso Security: An LLM-first solution that excels in runtime protection for LLMs, offering real-time detection of prompt injections and other attacks. Its focus is narrow, concentrating on runtime security with high usability due to its plug-and-play, self-learning nature142.
HiddenLayer: With $56M in funding and Gartner recognition, HiddenLayer is strong in model security, offering protection against adversarial attacks and runtime monitoring.
Noma: Suited for self-hosted environments, Noma provides MLOps monitoring and security for data pipelines and the model supply chain, but it can be resource-intensive and has limited runtime capabilities.
Guardrails AI: Focuses on output governance, allowing for dynamic rules and redaction of sensitive information145. It is vital for regulated sectors but primarily deals with post-processing of model outputs146.
WhyLabs: Excels in observability for model quality through its WhyLogs dashboard but offers no direct intervention or response capabilities.
Witness AI: With $27.5M in funding, Witness AI provides high visibility into AI usage, detects jailbreaks, and enforces policies.
TrojAI: A red teaming solution ideal for preemptive testing, it simulates adversarial attacks and offers runtime defense but is less focused on continuous monitoring.
Section 5: Comparative Analysis and Strategic Insights
AI Data Security Capability Matrix
The following matrix provides a high-level comparison of the vendors, rated against their coverage of the 7-phase lifecycle, based on the detailed analysis.
Analysis by Vendor Archetype
Hyperscalers (Google, Microsoft): Their strength is unparalleled integration, offering a single platform for data, AI, and security311. This simplifies procurement and management but risks vendor lock-in and "good enough" rather than best-in-class features in every niche312. They are the default choice for organizations heavily invested in a single cloud and seeking a streamlined, one-stop-shop approach313.
Consolidated Cybersecurity Platforms (CrowdStrike, Palo Alto Networks, etc.): These vendors allow enterprises to leverage existing security investments in EDR, XDR, or SASE. Their weakness is that AI security can be an extension of existing products (e.g., a rebranded CSPM) rather than a purpose-built solution, potentially lacking deep, model-level scanning capabilities315.
Data-Centric & Governance Specialists (Cyera, Immuta, etc.): Their strength is a deep expertise in data, the most foundational aspect of AI security316. Their capabilities in discovery, classification, and access control are second to none, making them indispensable for regulated industries317. Their weakness is that they don't always address vulnerabilities in the model or runtime stack318. They are essential for any organization where data governance and privacy are primary drivers319.
MLSecOps & Model Security Innovators (Protect AI, Mindgard, etc.): These startups are purpose-built to solve AI-native security problems like model integrity scanning and automated red teaming320. Their solutions are designed for developers and integrate tightly into DevSecOps workflows321. Their weakness can be the narrowness of their focus and the potential lack of global support infrastructure compared to incumbents322. They are a critical component for any organization building its own AI models and should be procured to complement broader platforms323.
Key Technology Deep Dive
Automated Red Teaming: Traditional penetration testing is too slow for dynamic LLMs324. A new category of automated red teaming platforms from vendors like Mindgard, Protect AI (Recon), and CalypsoAI has emerged325. These tools systematically test AI applications against thousands of attack vectors, can run continuously in a CI/CD pipeline, and provide rapid feedback to harden models at scale326.
DSPM vs. AI-SPM: It's critical to distinguish between Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) and AI Security Posture Management (AI-SPM)327. DSPM, from vendors like Cyera and Immuta, secures the data that AI systems use by discovering, classifying, and assessing its posture328. AI-SPM, offered by platform vendors like CrowdStrike and Palo Alto Networks, secures the AI service or infrastructure itself by assessing its configuration for weaknesses329. A comprehensive strategy requires both330330.
Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PETs): PETs offer a solution to the dilemma of balancing model accuracy with data privacy. Enveil is a standout vendor, using homomorphic encryption to allow AI models to be trained and perform inference on data while it remains encrypted332. This protects raw information while still allowing the model to learn, a capability Gartner highlights as critical for the future of AI governance333.
Section 6: Strategic Recommendations and Outlook
Integrated Strategy and Procurement Pathways
No single solution covers all security aspects; the ideal strategy is an integrated, multi-vendor approach tailored to the organization's profile
For a Large, Multi-Cloud Financial Institution:
This persona faces stringent regulations and has teams building proprietary models335. The priority is defense-in-depth with strong governance336.
Foundation (Data): Start with a best-in-class Data-Centric & Governance platform like Immuta for granular access control and Cyera for comprehensive DSPM337.
Infrastructure & Runtime: Layer on a Consolidated Cybersecurity Platform like Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud for robust CNAPP and AI-SPM338.
Model Security: Procure a dedicated MLSecOps Innovator like Protect AI for pre-deployment model scanning and automated red teaming within the CI/CD pipeline339.
Governance: Implement a dedicated AI governance platform like Credo AI to manage compliance and create a centralized, auditable record of all AI projects340.
For a Cloud-Native Tech Startup:
This persona values speed, operates on a single cloud, and integrates public LLMs into its product341. The priority is lightweight, developer-friendly security342.
Foundation (Platform Native): Maximize the native tools of your primary Hyperscale Platform, such as Google's Model Armor and Security Command Center or Microsoft's Defender for Cloud and Azure AI Content Safety343.
"Shift-Left" (CI/CD): Embed a developer-friendly MLSecOps Innovator like Protect AI's Guardian Local Scanner or Mindgard's testing tool directly into the CI/CD pipeline for immediate feedback344.
API & Runtime (Firewall): Protect public-facing LLM applications with a lightweight, API-based AI firewall from an innovator like Lakera Guard, CalypsoAI, or Lasso Security for real-time protection.
Observability & Governance: Add Observability platforms like WhyLabs to monitor model quality and Output Governance tools like Guardrails AI to ensure compliance346.
Future Outlook
Convergence: The distinctions between DSPM, CSPM, and Application Security will continue to blur, moving toward unified "Code-to-Data" security platforms that provide a single, contextualized view of risk347.
The Agentic AI Security Challenge: The next major frontier is securing autonomous AI agents348. As highlighted by vendors like Zenity and Abnormal Security, security will evolve from protecting static assets to governing the behavior of dynamic, intelligent entities, demanding tools based on real-time intent monitoring and behavioral analysis349.
AI for AI Security: The only way to defend against AI-powered attacks is with AI-powered defense350. AI-driven threat detection (Vectra AI, Darktrace), automated remediation (CrowdStrike), and AI-powered security copilots (Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks) will become table stakes351. This trend is validated by the consistent need for automation to manage the scale of modern threats352. The future of AI security is about harnessing AI's power to create a more resilient and autonomous defense353.
An AI Solutions Framework Report based on past work, https://www.linkedin.com/posts/sol-rashidi-mba-a672291_gartner-mit-ai-activity-7338936771654676481-SyNp , https://softwareanalyst.substack.com/p/securing-aillms-in-2025-a-practical and https://menlovc.com/perspective/security-for-ai-genai-risks-and-the-emerging-startup-landscape/ and Gemini DeepSearch.
**** Written with patience, clear goals, good enough prompts and Gemini DeepSearch ****
Sorry for references to docs I can’t provide (privately hosted).
#TrustEverybodyButCutTheCards