Beyond Better: The Value Threshold that Drives Product Adoption
As product leaders, we often assume that if a new solution is objectively better, users will naturally adopt it. But time and again, we launch improvements only to watch users cling to the old way. Why?
Because adoption doesn’t happen when something is better. It happens when something is meaningfully better—when it surpasses a threshold of perceived value that justifies the cost of change.
This isn’t just instinct—it’s backed by decades of research in behavioral economics, innovation theory, and product strategy. Let’s explore five key reasons people delay switching—and what we can do about it.
1. Switching Costs Create Inertia
Even if the new solution is technically better, users weigh the cost of switching: time, learning, risk, disruption. That cost is often enough to maintain the status quo.
“Consumers may remain with an inferior option unless the perceived gain clearly exceeds the cost of change.” — Paul Klemperer, Markets with Consumer Switching Costs, 1987
Example: I still use PowerPoint for presentations—even though I’m aware of better-designed tools like Keynote, Pitch, or Beautiful.ai. Why? Because in most corporate settings, success hinges on the story, not the slide transitions. I know where everything is, and I can work quickly without friction. That familiarity—and the confidence it gives me—still outweighs the potential upside of switching.
Takeaway: Switching isn’t just a logistical hurdle—it’s a confidence gap. If your user already knows how to get the job done with their current tool, the new solution must deliver such clear, immediate, low-risk value that they trust it in their most critical moments.
2. Loss Aversion Magnifies Risk
People fear loss more than they value gain. A new solution might be better—but what if it breaks something that already works?
“Losses loom larger than gains.” — Kahneman & Tversky, Prospect Theory, 1979
Example: Intuit has been steadily nudging users from QuickBooks Desktop to QuickBooks Online (QBO), yet many longtime users continue to resist the switch. Why? Not because they deny the benefits of cloud access—but because they’re afraid of losing capabilities they rely on. One user summed it up well:
"The biggest downfall of QBO [Quickbooks Online] is that it is very different from QBD [Quickbooks Desktop] and has a learning curve. If the users do not learn how to properly use QBO, they can mess up the company's books BAD."
Others echo concerns about performance, limited reporting, and a less intuitive interface. For these users, the risk of losing key functionality outweighs the promise of anytime access.
Takeaway: Don’t just match the old—surpass it in a way that feels safe. Show users what they’ll gain, but also respect what they value in the current experience. Minimize perceived loss by preserving key workflows or offering side-by-side transition paths, while clearly demonstrating the superior outcomes your solution delivers.
3. It’s About Progress, Not Features
People switch when a product helps them make real progress—not when it merely adds features.
“Customers rarely buy a product just because it has better features. They switch because they want better outcomes.” — Clayton Christensen, Competing Against Luck, 2016
Example: Calendly won users not because it had the most advanced scheduling features, but because it eliminated the back-and-forth of finding a meeting time. It solved a frustrating, common problem and got out of the way.
Takeaway: Focus on the customer’s job to be done. What progress are they trying to make—and how do you accelerate it?
4. Perceived Advantage Must Be Obvious
If a product’s benefits aren’t immediately clear, most people won’t spend time discovering them.
“An innovation must offer a clear relative advantage to displace the status quo.” — Everett Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, 1962
Example: Slack gained traction because it was obviously better than email for internal team communication. Its searchable threads, integrations, and channel structure made value visible from day one.
Takeaway: Communicate the payoff in plain terms. "Search everything instantly" resonates more than "improved workflow efficiency."
5. Behavior Change Needs a Nudge
Even with a compelling case, people often wait. A shift in context, peer pressure, or well-timed prompt can tip the balance.
“Individuals have different thresholds for action, but once enough people adopt, others follow.” — Mark Granovetter, Threshold Models of Collective Behavior, 1978
Example: Zoom didn’t dominate the video conferencing space because of its feature set alone. The pandemic created a moment of urgency—and its simplicity, combined with widespread adoption, sealed the deal.
Takeaway: Use timing, peer validation, and urgency to help users feel it’s time to act.
What If You Build Something People Don’t Want to Leave?
Everything we’ve covered so far explains how to help users cross the value threshold and adopt a new solution. But what if your strategy isn’t to get people to switch—what if it’s to make switching feel unthinkable?
That’s where Apple excels.
Apple doesn’t try to reduce switching costs—they increase the perceived cost of leaving. Their ecosystem is designed with tight integrations that deliver undeniable convenience:
Each product strengthens the value of the others. The more you adopt, the harder it is to walk away.
This isn’t lock-in through policy—it’s lock-in through delightful convenience. Even users who recognize that an Android phone or Windows PC might offer more raw power or better value still hesitate to leave because the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
Apple isn’t just making their products better—they make leaving feel like a loss.
Takeaway: You don’t always have to fight switching resistance. Sometimes, you can design to benefit from it. Build reinforcing value across your product ecosystem. Invest in convenience, emotional resonance, and interconnection—not just features. The best retention strategy is making users feel that nothing else comes close.
A Simple Mental Model
Adoption happens when:
(Value of the New Solution – Effort to Switch – Fear of Loss) > Value of the Current Solution
If that equation doesn’t hold, the switch doesn’t happen.
Closing Thought
We don’t switch just because something is better. We switch when it’s better enough to overcome our doubts, habits, and effort. And as builders, that means our job isn’t just to improve the product—it’s to:
Or, if we’re on the other side of the equation— design something so compelling, integrated, and seamless that people don’t want to leave.
💬 Have you ever resisted a better solution? Or launched one that users were slow to adopt? I’d love to hear how you crossed the value threshold—or didn’t. Please feel free to share your thoughts.
THIRDPRODUCT | The product co-pilot powered by people
2moGreat insights, Charles! Feel Apple took a while to achieve delightful convenience, the approach even felt a bit like deliberate consternation in the early days but they stuck to their guns and got there