Can AI Spur a Talent Renaissance?
AI is a powerful tool, but it doesn’t set its own purpose. AI amplifies intentions. When you hear “AI will do X or Y”, remember this: AI = Amplified Intentions. Case in point:
If we add AI to hiring models to ‘screen out’ candidates for the pedigree they lack, then AI will screen out.
If we decide to ‘screen in' candidates based on skills they have - however those skills were acquired - deploying AI with that intention can enable ‘screen in signals’ at scale.
Opportunity@Work's Chief Impact Officer Papia Debroy and I recently wrote about this in The Brookings Institution “Using AI to advance skills-first hiring":
“In today’s labor market, if we direct AI to observe the patterns of the past, it will replicate the paper ceiling and accelerate its exclusionary effects. Instead, we should direct AI technologies to observe and understand workers’ skills and replicate skills-based pathways to accelerate the tearing of the paper ceiling, exponentially opening up opportunities to STARs* and connecting employers to the skilled talent they need.”
*STARs = the 70+ million people in the U.S. who do not have a bachelor’s degree - but are Skilled Through Alternative Routes like on-the-job, through military service, community college, partial college completion, workforce training programs, skills bootcamps, and more.
Fears of ‘algorithmic exclusion’ are legitimate, but not because of some inherent quality of AI. The risk comes from lazily perpetuating the paper ceiling that pointlessly excludes millions of people with the skills to do in-demand jobs, including adaptive skills needed in an AI era.
Our intention must be to use AI to tap into all our talents, augment human skills, accelerate skill development, and boost the agility with which millions of workers translate skills into economic mobility, learning into earning. Don’t blame the tools, change the rules.
I recently heard a powerful ‘intentions matter’ example earlier this year at ASU+GSV when I hosted a panel called “Skills Over Degrees: the STARs Revolution in Hiring” with experts from Indeed Google McKinsey & Company and Tallo. To no surprise, AI’s impact on hiring was a major part of the conversation - STAR and Tear the Paper Ceiling champion Carolyn Pierce of McKinsey reflected on this moment:
“When the rise of online applications began in the early 2000s, I don’t think people sat in a room and decided, ‘Let’s require a bachelor’s degree to exclude most of the workforce.’ It happened by accident. But here’s the thing—we are the people in that room today. And this time, we have the opportunity to make different decisions.” - Carolyn Pierce, Partner, McKinsey & Company and STAR
We need to take seriously the reality that you don't say, "you have a bachelor's degree, here's the job." Rather, you want to assess skills and qualities. Well, why can't you do that for everyone? We have a heuristic that was developed in the early 2000s when all you had was keyword search filters. Now we have big data. Now we have AI. There's absolutely no reason why we should limit ourselves to these screens.
As I told WorkShift reporter Paul Fain when asked why I’m optimistic about AI:
“We’ve got too many problems to solve…We need all the talents to solve them.”
100% the real breakthrough isn’t AI itself, but how we redesign systems to recognize and amplify human capability. Inclusion and adaptability aren’t side benefits, but they’re essential for an AI‑ready workforce.
Vice-Chair, STARs Advisory Council
1wHelpful insight, perfectly stated.
Thought Leadership Consultant | Public Speaking Coach | Speaker | Former Talent + EconDev Researcher
1wThis quote from Carolyn Pierce constantly fuels me to keep going - we’re in the room now, and we can make different choices: "When the rise of online applications began in the early 2000s, I don’t think people sat in a room and decided, ‘Let’s require a bachelor’s degree to exclude most of the workforce.’ It happened by accident. But here’s the thing—we are the people in that room today. And this time, we have the opportunity to make different decisions.”
Director | Largest Strategic Resource for Rope Access, NDT & Wind Energy Skills | Optimising Labour Markets | Regenerative Recruitment | Workforce Safety & Ethical AI
1wByron Auguste I completely agree the paper ceiling absolutely needs tearing down. But even if that is achieved, a deeper structural issue remains. Skills shortages are being amplified not just by exclusionary credentials or outdated norms, but by the very architecture of information distribution. Social media’s advertising revenue model is locked into a path dependency that favours engagement over inclusion, essentially suppressing the majority of viable candidates from ever seeing work opportunities. You are right that we must “change the rules”, but the uncomfortable truth is that we cannot. The platforms cannot change what they are without dismantling their own economic model. We are not just at a crossroads. We are at an evolutionary fork. One path prioritises monetised engagement. The other enables open access to opportunity. Until we build alternatives, exclusion is not just a bug. It is the business model. Read more: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/cause-global-skill-shortages-explained-martin-smith-h70fe/
Reimagining Startup Growth at the Speed of AI | Strategy Meets Velocity
1wTrue leadership reshapes systems by intention, not inertia. AI is not a filter. It’s a force amplifier. When we design for inclusion, we don’t just hire better we build a future where every untapped talent fuels transformation. Brilliant message, Byron. The next era belongs to those who amplify with purpose. Win-win.💎 Shirin Barkam