Can WPP Reinvent Itself? A Blueprint for How the ‘Mad Men’ Can Outrun the ‘Math Men’
Throughout my marketing career across different countries, I’ve worked with the WPP network—from G2 to Grey, to Ogilvy, JWT, VML, Landor, BCW and many more. It’s been a lifelong creative partnership—sometimes frictional (in a positive way), often magical. It’s a company filled with some of the most brilliant, committed brand builders I’ve known—people who care deeply about building brands that last.
So this isn’t just another obituary for the holding company model. It’s a provocation from someone who still believes.
But belief needs a foundation—and right now, the numbers are crumbling:
This isn’t a dip. It’s a reckoning.
🧵 The Real Threat Isn’t AI. It’s Irrelevance.
Meta ’s Mark Zuckerberg recently declared:
“In the future, businesses won’t need to provide creative or media plans. Just tell us your objective and budget—and our AI will generate, optimise, and deliver everything.” (Source: TechCrunch, May 2025)
With Meta’s “Infinite Creative,” Zuckerberg envisions a future platform that renders briefs obsolete. One that automates creative, media, and optimisation. One that doesn’t need an agency.
But frankly, the bleeding started long before Mark declared the new frontier:
According to Boston Consulting Group (BCG) ’s report Future of Marketing with GenAI (June 2025), with the rapid adoption of AI:
So picture this: You’re a global CMO. You've been asked to trim 30% of headcount, localise for 19 markets, and prove ROI on every cent. All while staying perfectly on brand.
Under that pressure, CMOs won’t just fire their agency. They’ll fire the whole old model.
So, if the rumour mills believe that a tech-background CEO will simply revolutionise AI adoption and WPP will turn around—it may be too little, too late.
🚀 So What Business Is WPP Really In?
Let’s go back to first principles. What business is an agency in?
I didn’t see the founding manifesto of WPP, but I’m fairly sure it didn’t say:
“We exist to win the maximum number of Grand Prix at Cannes Lions.”
That’s not a strategy. That’s an outcome. So let’s forget the award shows and manifestos for a second.
→ Agencies are in the business of delivering commercial growth by building strong brands.
That was true in the 1960s when agencies gave us We Try Harder, Heineken refreshes the parts..., and The ultimate driving machine. And it’s true now—even if the channels, formats, and expectations have changed beyond recognition.
But today’s brand world isn’t only defined by a big idea and a media buy. It still needs that idea—but also agility, integration, iteration, localisation, and measurable outcomes layered around it. And all of that at a cheaper rate.
And there I see the biggest opportunity from a client lens.
As the BCG report suggested, brands are seeing a 30–50% reduction in orchestration headcount. Clients still want to own brand strategy—but they need someone else to deliver:
What they need isn’t another campaign creative. What they need is an operating system.
💪 What If WPP Becomes the AWS of Brand Delivery?
This is where agencies like WPP have an opening—if they’re brave enough to stop calling themselves agencies.
Imagine WPP not as a creative network, but as a BrandOps Engine: A modular platform (i.e. each service can run independently or plug into a unified system—like Lego blocks for brand delivery):
Clients still steer the ship. WPP becomes the engine room.
It works like a modular pod, where all WPP vertical agencies are integrated:
The point is: BrandOps should be modular—Strategy, Execution, Local Activation—each offered à la carte or fully integrated.
For the brilliant people inside WPP—planners, creatives, strategists—this isn’t a call for replacement. This model will demand new muscles inside WPP—led not just by creatives, but by cross-functional teams fluent in ops, tech, and brand. It’s a plea for reinvention. So their talent can still lead, not lag, in this next chapter.
How is this BrandOps model different from what WPP already does for big clients today?
And if WPP gets this pivot right? It could become the AWS of marketing operations—serving brands with leaner teams, faster outputs, and built-in intelligence.
📊 The Commercial Case
"In God we trust. All others must bring data."
So what makes this more than an opinion piece? The numbers do.
What I’ve proposed isn’t just about replacing the traditional agency model—it’s about partially replacing clients’ internal teams too.
Let’s look at the size of the prize (ballpark figures):
Potentially Addressable Market for BrandOps: $1.1–1.2 Trillion.
Even a 2% capture = $24B revenue runway.
Modular services open doors to entirely new budget lines—from marketing ops to digital transformation. BrandOps could drive better margins, lower delivery costs, and greater resilience across economic cycles.
And WPP already has what others are racing to build: full verticals, global footprint, trust, and talent.
Most importantly, clients’ marketing, finance, and procurement leads would welcome outcome-based pricing.
🏋️ What It Looks Like in Practice
Imagine you're Diageo , launching a new spirit across Southeast Asia.
WPP’s BrandOps Engine plugs into your martech stack. It:
It won’t happen overnight. But when scaled post-pilot, it delivers execution at scale—while keeping brand creativity and cultural relevance intact.
🏇 Who WPP Would Be Competing With
If WPP redefines what business it’s in, this won’t be the old battlefield of holding companies elbowing each other for ad spend anymore. The competition will change:
The reality is—whether WPP walks that path or not—the playground has changed, and these new competitors will keep eroding the value of their traditional model.
🎨 What About Creativity?
The question remains: does this make WPP a 'Math Man' (i.e. chasing performance marketing, forgetting creativity)? The sacred thing we all fear AI will erase.
The big idea and great copy are still part of the modular offer. But they’ll land more effectively as AI is trained to write 1,000 nuanced versions of "Got Milk?":
The big idea doesn’t die. It multiplies.
BrandOps doesn’t sideline creativity. It lets it lead—then scale.
⚡ So Where Do We Go From Here?
WPP has a chance to lead again—not by defending the past, but by designing the future.
Because the question isn’t how to make the current model more efficient. It’s whether that model still serves the job clients need done.
What it needs is the courage to stop calling itself an agency.
And let’s remember: when your legacy is creativity, the boldest move isn’t nostalgia. It’s reinvention.
🔍 Could WPP become the AWS of BrandOps? Or will Meta and Accenture get there first?
📚 References
[1] Statista. "Global Advertising Spending Forecast 2025." [2] Internal Content Studios & Ops: Estimate based on WFA data and Deloitte’s “CMO Survey” (2024). [3] MarketsandMarkets. "Marketing Automation Market by Solution – Global Forecast 2024." [4] Gartner. "CMO Spend Survey 2024." [5] Localisation/Compliance Services: Estimate derived from Lionbridge, SDL, and RWS revenue disclosures. [6] World Federation of Advertisers (WFA). "The Rise of In-House Agencies: Global Trends Report." [7] Boston Consulting Group (BCG). "Future of Marketing with GenAI," June 2025.
Helping Teams Think Beyond the Tech | Expert in CX, Enterprise Architecture and IT Transformation
6dI hope you are right, and there is a way out and up …
Performance Lead: Absa One for Publicis | I Scale & Grow Businesses & Revenue: Performance & Search Marketing: SEO & PPC | E-commerce, Fintech & Lead Gen | AI & Marketing Automation 🚀Jury:Credipple Emerging Talent 2024
2wThanks for the great read and insight. What would really throw the cat amongst the pigeons is execution and timelines.
Director at Sherson Willis | Corporate Affairs Expert | Political Commentator
2wThis is my headline of the week so far, Tanvir H. Siddiqui. Great hook and a timely analysis of whether this is evolution vs extinction of a business model.
Thanks for this, Tanvir H. Siddiqui. I think this is view any scaled agency should be looking through, not just WPP. WPP Open is, in theory, an operating system that can enable this and with the right strategic leadership, creative bravery and commercial acumen they can certainly activate something like this and claim some of that BrandOps pie. But with the right foundation, approach and agility I think many agencies can claim some of that revenue as well.
Founder & CEO | mktg.ai | Bridging creativity and analytics with Applied AI for marketers
2wIt's a shame when we presented the concept of mktg.ai to the board of WPP.com in 2000, when Ester Dyson called it "the holy grail of advertising" and the leadership (former leadership) said "Kevin, we'll give you $50K to start this" to which we all laughed that they didn't take advantage. Here are some facts; J. Walter Thompson Worldwide was the only agency to have its own ad server until DoubleClick (now Google) bought the system and shut it down. We created a lot of firsts. But it's clear that all the holding companies focused on the impression, media and media arb, and not on what makes the impression...the creative. Now they find themselves in a pinc, because media is just one part of the story. mktg.ai IS the solution for marketers. It is the system of record that takes marketers creative and audits, archives and analysis creative assets to establish a long term foundation for brands.