Cloud-Native .NET Development on Azure
Azure supports both new development and modernization for companies using Microsoft .NET. This guide for senior technical decision-makers (CIO/CTO/VP Engineering) outlines good architecture patterns, Azure service options, and deployment practices for cloud-native .NET applications.
Cloud-Native Core Implementation Practices
Cloud-native applications use the cloud’s built-in features — automatic scaling, managed services, and global distribution. Cloud-native architectures are built on different principles than traditional on-premises designs.
Elastic workload sizing
Elastic workload sizing refers to cloud infrastructure that automatically adjusts the number of running instances as demand rises or falls. Applications that keep little or no state in memory can scale this way without interruption.
Asynchronous processing
Asynchronous processing moves slow or bursty tasks to background queues or event streams, allowing user-facing requests to finish quickly while the deferred work runs in parallel.
Resilience by design
Resilience by design assumes components will fail and prioritizes restoring service quickly (low MTTR) instead of eliminating every failure (high MTBF).
Polyglot persistence
Polyglot persistence stores each workload’s data in the engine that matches its needs: relational tables for structured transactions, document databases for flexible schemas, in-memory key-value caches for rapid reads, and column stores for analytics.
Loose coupling
Loose coupling means each service communicates through APIs, messages, or events, so a fault in one part stays isolated and the rest of the system keeps running.
Infrastructure as code
Servers, networks, and security rules are stored as code in version-controlled templates. Automation tools read these files and create or update the resources exactly as described. Each change is recorded, repeatable, and easy to roll back.
Immutable servers
An immutable server never changes once it is in production. When a new version of the application or its dependencies is ready, automation builds a fresh machine image, starts new instances from that image, shifts traffic to them, and then removes the old instances.
Operational foundations built in
Operational foundations built in means the system handles three routines by default:
Automated deployment pipelines — every code change moves through the same build, test, and release steps, so each production release is predictable.
Security in code and templates — access rules, secret storage, and compliance checks are written into the same files that define servers and networks, keeping them version-controlled and repeatable.
Monitoring and telemetry — logs, metrics, and traces are collected automatically, giving current data on system health and user activity.
High-Level Cloud-Native System Design Approaches
Microservices Architecture
Microservices help a team release software faster. Each service is a small, self-contained program, so a dedicated team can build, test, and deploy it on its own schedule, and the service can be scaled up or down without affecting the rest of the system. If one service fails, the failure is less likely to bring down the whole application.
This flexibility adds operational overhead. Running many services means more work for routing requests, discovering endpoints, and keeping data consistent across service boundaries. Solid DevOps practices — automated pipelines, clear observability, and well-rehearsed incident response — become important.
Choose microservices when a part of the application maps naturally to a single business domain and benefits from its own release cycle or elastic scaling. For a small or straightforward system, a well-structured monolith or simple N-tier design may be easier to build and run, yet still count as cloud native if it uses features like autoscaling and infrastructure as code.
Web Applications (N-Tier)
Many customer-facing web apps or internal tools can be built as modern 3-tier applications (front-end, API/backend, database) using Azure’s PaaS offerings.
This simpler architecture is often sufficient and easier to govern. Azure App Service (for web/API) with a managed database can deliver scalability and resilience without breaking the app into dozens of services. Cloud design patterns (like caching, retry policies, CDNs for static content, etc.) can still be applied to increase reliability and performance.
Serverless & Event-Driven
For certain workloads, an event-driven serverless approach is ideal. Azure Functions (Functions-as-a-Service) allow running .NET code triggered by events (HTTP requests, queue messages, timers, etc.) with automatic scaling and a pay-per-execution model. This is great for sporadic workloads, background jobs, or integrating application events.
Serverless architectures can speed up development (no infrastructure to manage) and minimize costs for low-volume services since you "pay only for what you use" in compute.
Event-driven patterns (using message queues or pub/sub) further decouple components – instead of direct calls, services communicate via events, which improves resiliency and allows asynchronous processing to smooth out load spikes. Designing apps to be eventually consistent and reactive to events is a common cloud-native pattern, especially in microservices environments.
Implementation Guidelines for Cloud-Native .NET Applications
Cloud-native .NET applications should follow modern best practices akin to the 12-Factor App guidelines. Below we highlight 6 of these principles that are particularly relevant for .NET cloud applications.
Store every setting outside the codebase
In Azure App Configuration or environment variables. A change reaches running instances in about 30 – 60 seconds, so recovering from a bad value rarely takes more than a minute.
Manage external configuration
Reach databases, queues, and caches through injected connection strings kept in configuration. Moving from Azure SQL to Cosmos DB or resizing Redis becomes a configuration switch - downtime is limited to the brief connection cut-over.
Keep the service stateless
Persist data in Cosmos DB, Azure SQL, or Azure Cache for Redis, not local memory. With no pod owning state, Kubernetes can add or replace replicas in well under a minute during a traffic spike or node failure.
Publish the API contract first
Each microservice or function exposes a versioned HTTP or gRPC interface before implementation. Clear boundaries let other teams develop and deploy independently, which reduces integration defects and shortens release cycles.
Build in observability
Emit structured logs, correlation IDs, and distributed traces to Azure Application Insights. A support engineer can trace a failing request across services in one query and usually find the root cause within minutes.
Wrap all outbound calls in resilience policies
Polly applies retries with exponential back-off, circuit breakers, and fallback handlers around every HTTP or database call. Most transient errors recover automatically and are never visible to the user.
Adopting these steps gives you zero-downtime configuration changes, rapid horizontal scaling, and predictable recovery. This is the baseline for any cloud-native .NET system.
Well-Architected Framework
Use Microsoft’s Azure Well-Architected Framework as the baseline checklist for every cloud workload. The framework groups guidance into reliability, security, cost optimization, operational excellence, and performance efficiency.
Reliability
Design for high availability and disaster recovery (multi-zone or multi-region deployment, use of Azure load balancers or Traffic Manager, database replication, etc.) to meet uptime SLAs.
Security
Enforce strong identity (Azure Active Directory integration for apps), protect secrets (Azure Key Vault), apply network controls (Azure Firewall, NSGs), and adopt a zero-trust posture. Ensure compliance requirements are met (discussed later).
Cost Optimization
Avoid over-provisioning with autoscale and Azure’s pay-as-you-go model. Use Azure Cost Management and Azure Advisor to continually optimize spending.
Operational Excellence
Invest in DevOps automation, CI/CD pipelines, and infrastructure as code to enable frequent, reliable releases and simplified management. This reduces human error and speeds up feature delivery.
Performance Efficiency
Use Azure’s global infrastructure (CDNs, caching, geo-distribution of data) to minimize latency for users, and design for scalability so that performance remains acceptable even under peak loads.
Evaluate each cloud-native .NET project against those areas before it moves to production.
Building New Cloud-Native .NET Applications on Azure
Designing a new application is the best time to implement cloud-native principles from the ground up. For new development, a cloud-first strategy is recommended – meaning you architect the solution with Azure’s PaaS and serverless services, rather than on-premises or VM-based deployments. This leads to immediate scalability.
Use Modern .NET and Cross-Platform Tools
Build on the latest .NET (which is cross-platform, high-performance, and designed for cloud workloads) to stay compatible with Linux containers and Azure services. Development teams use Visual Studio or VS Code along with Azure SDKs to streamline integration with Azure services (storage, identity, etc.). All major Azure services have .NET SDK support, which accelerates development.
PaaS-over-IaaS
Favor Azure’s platform-as-a-service offerings to minimize infrastructure management. For example, instead of self-managing VMs for web servers, use Azure App Service to host web apps and APIs – it’s a fully managed web platform with servers, load balancing, auto scaling, and patching. Similarly, use Azure Functions to run background tasks or microservices without provisioning servers.
By offloading infrastructure to Azure, your team concentrates on application code and business logic, delivering value faster.
PaaS services also come with built-in high availability and scalability.
Adopt Microservices & Containers thoughtfully
If the application domain is large or complex, consider a microservices architecture from the start. Design the system as a suite of small services, each representing a specific business capability, communicating via REST APIs, gRPC, or messaging.
Azure offers Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) as a managed container orchestration platform to run microservices in Docker containers. AKS gives full flexibility to run any custom or open-source stacks alongside .NET (useful if some services use Python, Node.js, etc.), and makes easier rolling updates, self-healing, and orchestration of the services.
AKS introduces more operational complexity than purely using PaaS – it’s optimized for scenarios where you have many microservices or need fine-grained control over container runtime and networking.
If your new app doesn’t require the full power of Kubernetes, opt for simpler alternatives like Azure App Service (which can also host containerized apps) or Azure Container Apps (a newer service that runs containers in a serverless way).
The key is to choose the right hosting model for each component: use Azure App Service for front-end web apps or standard business APIs (it provides built-in load balancing and multi-region failover out-of-the-box for high availability), use AKS for complex microservice backends, and Functions for event-driven or intermittent tasks.
Use Azure-Managed Datastores
New applications store data in several models—relational, document, and key-value—and Azure supplies a managed service for each.
Use Azure SQL Database for relational data. It keeps SQL Server features and adds automatic scaling, backups, and auto-tuning. Entity Framework runs without code changes, so .NET projects can adopt it quickly.
Use Azure Cosmos DB for global NoSQL workloads. It offers Core (SQL), MongoDB, and Cassandra APIs, replicates across regions, and targets under 10 ms read latency at the 99th percentile. This suits SaaS apps that need low latency and flexible schemas.
For event sourcing or CQRS design pattern, write event logs to Cosmos DB or Azure Storage. Both scale without preset limits.
Store documents and images in Azure Blob Storage. Use Tables for key-value data, Files for shared file storage, and Queues for message buffering.
Integrate Advanced Services as Needed
New .NET projects can plug directly into Azure’s managed services and add advanced features without building new infrastructure.
To bring in AI, call Azure Cognitive Services or Azure OpenAI and use their vision or language models through simple APIs. When your product needs a custom model, train and deploy it in Azure Machine Learning and keep all model assets in one place.
For analytics, load bulk data into Azure Synapse Analytics or Azure Data Lake Storage and stream device or application events through Azure Event Hubs. Synapse then runs queries at scale, so reports and dashboards stay fast as data grows.
Azure manages scaling, patching, and security for each service, so engineering teams spend their time on application logic and new capabilities reach customers sooner.
Security and DevOps from Day One
Start with security. Use Azure AD for authentication and role management. Run sensitive workloads inside virtual networks and expose databases only through private endpoints. Store every secret — API keys, connection strings — in Azure Key Vault, not in code or configuration files.
Create a basic CI/CD pipeline as soon as the first commit lands with Azure DevOps or GitHub Actions. Keep infrastructure as code, run automated tests on every commit, and publish monitoring dashboards with each release.
Early setup is a small task when the codebase is new. It prevents later refactoring and lets the team ship updates quickly and safely.
Modernizing Existing .NET Applications
Many enterprises have a portfolio of legacy .NET applications (ASP.NET MVC/Web Forms, WCF services, Windows Services, etc.) that are critical to the business. Modernizing these applications to the cloud provides access to scalability, reliability, and cost efficiency – but it needs to be done strategically. A one-size-fits-all approach does not work. Assess each application and choose an appropriate modernization strategy.
Rehost ("Lift and Shift" to Azure IaaS)
A lift-and-shift migration places the existing application on Azure virtual machines that mirror the on-premises servers, leaving the code untouched. Azure Migrate assesses the environment, replicates each virtual machine or database, and orchestrates the cutover.
Projects of this type usually complete in days or weeks. User experience stays stable while Azure assumes responsibility for hardware, redundancy, and a 99.95 percent virtual machine–level service-level agreement. Capital tied up in data center assets can be retired, and operational overhead decreases.
The workload still runs on infrastructure as a service, so it gains baseline cloud benefits such as elastic virtual machine scale sets and global reach. However, the architecture itself remains unchanged, and platform-level efficiencies become available only if the application is refactored later.
Replatform ("Lift, Tinker, and Shift" to Azure PaaS/Containers)
Replatforming requires light adjustments so that an existing application can run on newer, more managed Azure services without changing its core logic.
A legacy .NET workload may be containerized and scheduled on Azure Kubernetes Service or Azure Container Instances, or an IIS-based site may move from virtual machines to Azure App Service. Teams often replace a self-hosted SQL Server with Azure SQL Database, or upgrade from .NET Framework to a current .NET release to support Linux hosting.
You get autoscaling, managed patching, and built-in monitoring while leaving business rules untouched. App Service assumes operating system maintenance and load balancing. AKS containers gain Azure Monitor insights and can be split into smaller components over time.
As a result, companies benefit from cloud elasticity without a full rewrite, making replatforming a middle step between lift-and-shift and full refactoring.
Refactor / Rearchitect (Cloud-Optimized Rewrite)
Refactoring is a major modernization where you significantly redesign and recode the application to align with cloud-native principles.
This means decomposing a monolithic application into microservices, rewriting portions to use serverless functions or managed services, and restructuring the solution to be cloud-native (twelve-factor compliant, highly scalable, loosely coupled).
For example, a legacy on-premises ASP.NET app might be refactored into a set of .NET microservices running in containers on AKS, with a React front-end, using Azure Service Bus for communication and Cosmos DB for certain data, etc.
Or you might replace parts of the system with Azure PaaS offerings (like using Azure Functions to run background jobs that were previously Windows scheduled tasks).
This approach offers the full benefits of the cloud – maximizing scalability, agility, and resilience – because the application is re-built to natively exploit Azure capabilities (autoscale, distributed caching, global distribution, etc.).
The obvious downside is the effort, time, and cost: refactoring is a significant software project, akin to developing a new application. It requires strong technical teams and careful change management.
It’s best suited for applications that are strategic to the business where long-term benefits (feature agility, virtually unlimited scalability, etc.) justify the upfront investment.
Companies that succeed with refactoring often do it in stages (module by module) or use the strangler pattern (gradually replacing parts of the old system with new services) to mitigate risk.
Rebuild (Replace with a New Cloud-Native Application)
In some cases, the fastest way to modernization is to start over and build a new application that fulfills the same needs, then migrate the users/data from the old system to the new one.
Rebuilding allows you to design the solution with a clean slate, using modern architecture from day one (a brand new .NET microservices or serverless architecture on Azure) without any legacy constraints.
Microsoft’s guidance and tooling can accelerate such rebuilds – for example, using the latest .NET project templates, perhaps the "Modernization Platform" guidance for cloud-native .NET, and ready-to-use services.
The advantage is maximum flexibility and innovation: you can incorporate cloud-native features freely, integrate AI/analytics from the ground up, eliminate all technical debt, and create a solution that will serve for the next decade.
As an example, if you have a legacy on-prem ERP-like system, you might decide to build a new solution using microservices on AKS, with each service aligned to a business domain, and a separate modern web front-end – delivering a next-generation product.
This approach is appropriate if the legacy app is too outdated or inflexible to justify incremental fixes, and if the business can afford the time and cost of a full rebuild.
Often, this goes hand-in-hand with a strategic shift (offering a SaaS version of a historically on-premises product).
The risk is ensuring feature parity and data migration, but if done successfully, the new application can dramatically out-perform the old one and be much easier to evolve going forward.
When planning modernization, consider the strategic importance of each application, its current pain points (scalability issues? high operations cost? etc.), and regulatory or compatibility constraints. Not every app warrants an expensive refactor – some can remain on VMs if they are low priority, whereas customer-facing or revenue-generating systems likely deserve full modernization. Conduct a portfolio assessment to segment applications and assign a modernization strategy to each (often with Azure’s guidance via a Cloud Adoption Framework methodology).
Key Azure Services for Modernization
For web apps and APIs, Azure App Service is a great target (it supports running full .NET Framework apps on Windows or .NET Core on Linux). Microsoft provides the Azure App Service Migration Assistant (a free tool) that can scan your IIS-hosted .NET sites and automate moving them to App Service. This can significantly accelerate rehosting/replatforming of web applications.
If you containerize legacy apps (for example, using Docker images for older .NET apps with Windows Containers), Azure Kubernetes Service can run those containers with enterprise-grade orchestration. AKS is often used when modernizing large .NET apps that are broken into multiple services or where you introduce new microservices alongside parts of the old system. It provides consistency – you can run both Linux and Windows containers, meaning you can host older .NET Framework components (which require Windows Server) and newer .NET Core services together in one AKS cluster.
For legacy WCF or service bus scenarios, consider Azure Service Bus or Azure Relay to bridge connectivity, and look at modern alternatives like gRPC or REST APIs for internal communications going forward. Azure Service Bus is often part of modernization to decouple and "cloud-enable" communications – replacing older MSMQ or in-process calls with Service Bus topics/queues for asynchronous messaging between components.
Data modernization
If you have on-prem SQL Server, migrating to Azure SQL Database or Azure SQL Managed Instance is usually the best route.
These provide the same T-SQL surface area with automatic patches, high availability, and scaling. Managed Instance is ideal if you need near-100% SQL Server compatibility (supports more legacy features), whereas Azure SQL DB is a great target for most new .NET apps or simple migrations.
For NoSQL data (like if you used MongoDB or Couchbase on-prem), Azure Cosmos DB’s MongoDB API could allow a relatively easy switch to a fully managed service. Azure’s Database Migration Service can facilitate migrating data with minimal downtime. Also, consider moving on-prem file shares to Azure Storage or Azure Files, and using Azure Blob Storage for archival data as part of modernization.
DevOps and Process
Modernization isn’t just about where the app runs – it’s an opportunity to improve how it’s built and operated.
Introduce a proper CI/CD pipeline for applications being moved to Azure (if you didn’t have one).
Azure DevOps or GitHub Actions can automate the build, testing, and deployment of even legacy apps once they are in the cloud environment.
Future updates or refactoring can be delivered continuously, not in big painful releases.
Quick Wins vs Long-Term Refactoring
An effective strategy is to identify "low-hanging fruit" that can be quickly replatformed to show immediate value – like an internal tool that can move to Azure App Service in a couple of weeks and demonstrate reduced downtime or improved performance.
These wins build confidence and support for deeper changes. Meanwhile, plan for more challenging refactoring of core systems on a realistic timeline. It’s often wise to time major refactoring efforts with business cycles (do not overhaul a critical customer system right before peak season, instead, do a portion off-season and another portion later). Use feature flags or parallel running (blue-green deployments) to minimize risk when deploying refactored components.
How Belitsoft Can Help
Belitsoft supplies dedicated teams and full-lifecycle services that help enterprises and mid-market organizations modernize existing .NET applications and build new ones on Azure, ensuring secure, resilient, and scalable systems for the decade ahead.
Engagements are staffed with cloud architects, senior .NET/Azure developers, DevOps engineers, QA automation specialists, project managers, and security experts, scaled to the project’s size and regulatory context. After deployment, Belitsoft provides managed services for updates, monitoring, incident response, performance tuning, and cost control.